17 ans à aider les entreprises françaises
à choisir le meilleur logiciel
athenaOne
Description de athenaOne
athenaOne aide les médecins à prodiguer des soins de haute qualité en organisant leur emploi du temps de soins pour une productivité clinique optimisée ; le logiciel se charge des services administratifs et de qualité pour le médecin afin d'assurer un paiement intégral, tout en faisant suivre toutes les ordonnances des médecins pour traiter l'ensemble du processus, des résultats et des soins de suivi. Les médecins profitent ainsi d'un accès intégré et constant aux bonnes pratiques du plus grand réseau clinique des États-Unis, aux directives du secteur et aux règles de qualité les plus à jour et rigoureuses.
Qui utilise athenaOne ?
Médecins, médecins-chefs de service, responsables cliniques, responsables de cabinet, administrateurs de bureau, directeurs des soins, médecins en chef, administrateurs d'hôpital, infirmiers praticiens, assistants-médecins
athenaOne ne vous convainc pas tout à fait ?
Comparer avec une alternative populaire
athenaOne
Avis sur athenaOne
We love all things Athena EMR!
Very easy to pick up and get going.
Avantages :
The user interface is very friendly and everything is set up to guide you through easily while entering patient information.
Inconvénients :
Sometimes the add on software like the label printer and document printer would stop working, but that is rare.
Athena Review
Commentaires : Athena one is such an easy site to use from a healthcare standpoint. Scanning in orders is so convenient and everything is easy to sort through.
Avantages :
I have used so many different electronic health sites and Athena is by far the most user friendly and hardly ever has tech issues.
Inconvénients :
Sometimes when the site is down there is no communication about it and you have to figure it out on your own.
Report Data is NOT true data
Commentaires : Overall experience is one of much dislike to having to "vote" to get improvements. If they wanted to build a practice customizable EMR, they missed the mark gravely. Changes happened in November to the UDS reporting capability. Reports for clinical data were a mess, unreasonable, and horribly incorrect. They need much help with writing the logic in their reporting criteria.
Avantages :
Facesheet shows all of the pertinent information on each patient before an encounter is open. AS LONG AS the clinical staff have updated the chart correctly.
Inconvénients :
I am stating this as a personal opinion that does not represent my present or past employer. I have used this EMR for FIVE (5) years in front office. back office, management, and reports. There are too many workarounds for the providers and support staff. Their logic in reports is insane. Data does not pull accurately, so charts have to be manually checked to see if a measure is actually satisfied. Calling the CSC in FIVE years, has resulted in ONE (1) helpful specialist, the others always have to put in a further review case, which never gets answered logically. I ask specifics and am given back elusive answers that leave me feeling inept, and I know it is this system, not my experience or understanding. ACO and UDS reporting is LOGICAL. The number of patients in a measure, like tobacco screening and cessation, is the denominator. The number of patients that have been screened for use and cessation education is the numerator. Easy to understand. Except Athena report logic doesn't pull accurate data. I have had to manually look at charts to see if the work was done by the clinical staff and change my data reporting that way before I report it out, and as of yesterday, out of 564 charts that "need data" in this report, 75 out of 100 satisfied the measure within the chart but not within the report. This is one example of the problems with the Athena logic, and why I would never recommend this to any FQHC that needs to report data to CCPM, ACO or HRSA.
Patient care in your hands
Commentaires : It has been awesome to manage patients information, appointments and telehealth visits
Avantages :
Easy to manage patient information and user friendly for teleheath appointments
Inconvénients :
It does not work properly sometimes (15%) with Safary/IOS users and there seems to be no answer from athena.
User Friendly
Commentaires : Overall, my experience has been good. No complaints
Avantages :
It is user friendly. I like that it alerts you when patients information needs to be updated.
Inconvénients :
It is not easy to update patient insurance information.