17 ans à aider les entreprises françaises
à choisir le meilleur logiciel
Clinical Conductor CTMS
Description de Clinical Conductor CTMS
Clinical Conductor est un système de gestion des essais cliniques (CTMS) conçu pour les sites de recherche, les hôpitaux, les AMC, les réseaux de sites, les systèmes de santé et les CRO. Il aide les organisations menant des recherches cliniques à être plus efficaces et rentables. Le CTMS Clinical Conductor est l'application leader sur le marché, il facilite les procédures d'essai clinique et permet aux organisations de prendre de meilleures décisions commerciales et de relever tous les défis.
Qui utilise Clinical Conductor CTMS ?
Organismes de recherche clinique : CRO, centres médicaux universitaires, hôpitaux, organismes de santé, sponsors, sites de recherche, regroupements de sites, etc.
Clinical Conductor CTMS ne vous convainc pas tout à fait ?
Comparer avec une alternative populaire
Clinical Conductor CTMS
Avis sur Clinical Conductor CTMS
I love Clinical Conductor!
Commentaires : Customer Service is second to none. I've always had a great experience with everyone from the sales team to the support staff. Fun people with a great work ethic and sense of humor!
Avantages :
It's easy to use, very intuitive and provides many of the reports that I need for our site.
Inconvénients :
I would like for it to be able to integrate and import data from our EHR system.
Fast, Reliable Cloud based software 5.0
Commentaires : The ability of the system to track elements of a study to ensure you are capturing the functionality of the coordinator/PI time, ability to instill bonuses should it be needed, capture team coverage while primary will be out of office, recruitment management using social media and real time matrix showing financial analysis to make informed decisions on future studies. I would use their service and recommend to other research sites as well. Bio-optronics team has addressed every concerned we had in a prompt, courteous manner.
Avantages :
I like the web conferences offered to ensure your staff and administrator for the system understand the full capabilities of the program used. The ability to manage your documents and print at multiple sites should you need to be very comforting. the two part verification for stipend payment to prevent errors
Inconvénients :
The inability to lock data once verified by the study manager or administrator to ensure all of the team who worked on study get the credit. Which once explained to their team is being addressed. During a rollback to correct data you may need to complete information twice as it resets to default staff, a minor inconvenience.
Average Product
Commentaires : We've had the product for about 5 years. In my opinion, the product has great potential, but it consistently falls short on simple quality of life issues. For example, allowing the ability to sort all variables on a given page, and headers should remain static when scrolling down a large data set. Depending on the size of your organization, I would advise assigning an administrator for your site to help with establishing standard use guidelines and ensuring data quality. Without one, it can be very difficult to show reliable data or provide a "return on investment".
Avantages :
Pros: Financial functionalities are quite adequate. However, it does not conform to budgets with visit payments and conditional, invoiceable items for payment very well. Visit management is adequate. However, there are limitations conforming to protocols that require conditional, as needed items. For example, capturing reportable events at times outside of a scheduled protocol visit are challenging. Affordable. Customer service is responsive and unlimited.
Inconvénients :
Usability, user experience. Can be very difficult to navigate and answer questions clearly and quickly. Workarounds can be common and confusing for end users. Recruitment functionality is cumbersome and not customizable. Especially for sites where the pre-screening process can take weeks to months for a study.
Sound Medical Research
Commentaires : I've been using Clinical Conductor for about 5 years both as a clinical research coordinator and clinical trial manager and for the most part I've been happy with the product however the time it takes to navigate around for instance completing a visit, looking up an available time on the calendar then scheduling a visit or speaking to a CRA who needs to schedule a visit requires checking the calendar then going into studies choosing the study finding the monitor and scheduling the visit
Avantages :
The interface looks good and it fairly easy and intuitive for navigate for the most part. I like the training that is available.
Inconvénients :
For many things it can take a lot of clicks to get to where you want to go. My personal wish would be able to much more from my weekly calendar screen, such as schedule appointments and non-stud appointments, approve stipends and complete visits. When scheduling a patient it would be nice to have the scheduled date ranges and times with a list of available time slots for that visit.
Long Term User
Commentaires : As a company that has used this program since the beginning it has been a valuable tool to our organization and has continued to grow with Research and the ever changing world. It is continuing to meet the needs of its customers and continues to ask what they can do better.
Avantages :
This software helps to manage all aspects of our research organization from patient, study, billing, etc all in 1 software program.
Inconvénients :
There are so many tools within this software product, even after 10 years I still don't know everything and how to use each area.
Réponse de l'équipe de Advarra
il y a 4 ans
Thank you for the nice review! We are pleased that CC CTMS is valuable to you and your research organization. As you know from experience, we are committed to your sucess and will continue adapting to industry trends and listening to the needs of our user community. This will be strengthened as part of Advarra.