Pour qui ?

Organismes de recherche clinique : CRO, centres médicaux universitaires, hôpitaux, organismes de santé, sponsors, sites de recherche, regroupements de sites, etc.

Notes moyennes

25 avis
  • Note globale 4.5 / 5
  • Facilité d'utilisation 4.1 / 5
  • Service client 4.6 / 5
  • Fonctionnalités 4.1 / 5
  • Rapport qualité-prix 4.3 / 5

Informations sur le produit

  • Version gratuite Non
  • Version d'essai gratuite Non
  • Déploiement Cloud, SaaS, web
  • Formation Formation présentielle
    Formation en ligne en direct
    Webinaires
    Documentation
  • Ressources d'aide Service de support permanent (réponse directe)
    Support en horaire de bureau
    En ligne

Informations sur l'éditeur

  • Bio-Optronics
  • http://www.bio-optronics.com
  • Fondé en 1985

En savoir plus sur Clinical Conductor CTMS

Clinical Conductor est un système de gestion des essais cliniques (CTMS) conçu pour les sites de recherche, les hôpitaux, les AMC, les réseaux de sites, les systèmes de santé et les CRO. Il aide les organisations menant des recherches cliniques à être plus efficaces et rentables. Le CTMS Clinical Conductor est l'application leader sur le marché, il facilite les procédures d'essai clinique et permet aux organisations de prendre de meilleures décisions commerciales et de relever tous les défis.

Clinical Conductor CTMS - Fonctionnalités

  • Base de données de patients
  • Conforme HIPAA
  • Conformité 21 CFR Part 11
  • Gestion des documents
  • Gestion des inscriptions
  • Gestion des recrutements
  • Monitoring
  • Plan d'études
  • Planification
  • Saisie électronique des données

Logiciels similaires

Logiciels équivalents

Avis les plus utiles sur Clinical Conductor CTMS

Fast, Reliable Cloud based software 5.0

Publié le 30/08/2018
Douglas M.
Clinical Research Coordinator, CTMS Admin
Hôpitaux et soins de santé, 5 001-10 000 employés
Temps d'utilisation du produit: plus de deux ans
Provenance de l'utilisateur 
5/5
Note globale
5 / 5
Facilité d'utilisation
4 / 5
Fonctionnalités
5 / 5
Support client
5 / 5
Rapport qualité-prix
Probabilité de recommander le produit :
Très faible Très élevée

Commentaires: The ability of the system to track elements of a study to ensure you are capturing the functionality of the coordinator/PI time, ability to instill bonuses should it be needed, capture team coverage while primary will be out of office, recruitment management using social media and real time matrix showing financial analysis to make informed decisions on future studies. I would use their service and recommend to other research sites as well. Bio-optronics team has addressed every concerned we had in a prompt, courteous manner.

Avantages: I like the web conferences offered to ensure your staff and administrator for the system understand the full capabilities of the program used. The ability to manage your documents and print at multiple sites should you need to be very comforting.
the two part verification for stipend payment to prevent errors

Inconvénients: The inability to lock data once verified by the study manager or administrator to ensure all of the team who worked on study get the credit. Which once explained to their team is being addressed.
During a rollback to correct data you may need to complete information twice as it resets to default staff, a minor inconvenience.

Sound Medical Research

Publié le 19/11/2018
Utilisateur vérifié
Clinical Trial Manager (Site Level)
Recherche, 2-10 employés
Temps d'utilisation du produit: plus de deux ans
Provenance de l'utilisateur 
4/5
Note globale
3 / 5
Facilité d'utilisation
3 / 5
Fonctionnalités
4 / 5
Support client
4 / 5
Rapport qualité-prix
Probabilité de recommander le produit :
Très faible Très élevée

Commentaires: I've been using Clinical Conductor for about 5 years both as a clinical research coordinator and clinical trial manager and for the most part I've been happy with the product however the time it takes to navigate around for instance completing a visit, looking up an available time on the calendar then scheduling a visit or speaking to a CRA who needs to schedule a visit requires checking the calendar then going into studies choosing the study finding the monitor and scheduling the visit

Avantages: The interface looks good and it fairly easy and intuitive for navigate for the most part. I like the training that is available.

Inconvénients: For many things it can take a lot of clicks to get to where you want to go. My personal wish would be able to much more from my weekly calendar screen, such as schedule appointments and non-stud appointments, approve stipends and complete visits. When scheduling a patient it would be nice to have the scheduled date ranges and times with a list of available time slots for that visit.

Clinical Conductor Support cannot be beat!

Publié le 18/06/2014
Betsy H.
Project Manager/Database Admnistrator
Provenance de l'utilisateur 
5/5
Note globale
4 / 5
Facilité d'utilisation
Fonctionnalités
5 / 5
Support client
Rapport qualité-prix

Commentaires: We began using Clinical Conductor at our site in 2008 and have been very happy with our decision ever since! You couldn't ask for better customer support!! From the beginning, all of our data was transferred from our previous CTMS with ease. Support team provided excellent training and continues to do so as the CTMS continues to evolve with changing needs at the site level. We have been able to consolidate every aspect of our business and streamline processes from pre-study site selection through close-out activities. Where previously everyone had created their own spreadsheets to monitor and measure metrics, now everything is automatic and reports can be generated at the "click of a button". The ease of exporting to Excel for those who want to maintain their spreadsheets is also wonderful! We have been able to increase our budgets for recruitment advertising by providing detailed metrics and tracking of every call received and the outcome of enrollment in our studies. We are a dedicated clinical research site with multiple offices and multiple investigators and Clinical Conductor has been a "life-saver" to effectively manage all of our projects. Our site typically has 60-70 active studies (in various stages from site selection through close-out) at all times so as you can imagine we have encountered virtually any "odd" scenario you could imagine over our 6 years of using Clinical Conductor and we have always been able to make everything work. My one suggestion to anyone considering investing in a CTMS is to have a dedicated staff member as your Administrator for set-up; staff training and point of contact. The system can appear to be overwhelming because of the many capabilities but that Administrator can ensure things work appropriately for your site and can also develop SOPs for use and training users to ensure smooth operation. Once you get established the ease of use of the system is apparent and if you find something that doesn't work for your site the Support Team always welcomes your suggestions and provides quick instruction on how to accomplish your goals.

Review from the financial analyst perspective

Publié le 20/11/2018
Lynn L.
Sr. Financial Analyst
Recherche, 13-50 employés
Temps d'utilisation du produit: 6 à 12 mois
Provenance de l'utilisateur 
4/5
Note globale
5 / 5
Facilité d'utilisation
4 / 5
Fonctionnalités
Support client
Rapport qualité-prix
Probabilité de recommander le produit :
Très faible Très élevée

Avantages: Once we fully understood the various components this system is very easy to get around...invoicing for "invoiceable" items became very transparent and simplified.
We moved from a completely Excel based system of study 'trackers' to CTMS and we're currently working a blend of both Excel & CTMS.
Having the data at our fingertips without having to wait for month end processing was a strong argument for going with this model.
The consultants were awesome and understood our current state business processes, working diligently with us to create the current CTMS business process.

Inconvénients: I think the reporting could be more dynamic. I'd like to be able to have trending report; also reports that provide multiple 'answers' on just one report. This can be done, but not currently as a 'one stop report'.
Time cards are coming in the next release...this was a high priority for us in choosing Clinical Conductor...not a con per se, but have not seen the final product yet.

CC Review

Publié le 21/11/2018
Jennifer B.
Administrative Director
Recherche, 13-50 employés
Temps d'utilisation du produit: plus de deux ans
Provenance de l'utilisateur 
4/5
Note globale
3 / 5
Facilité d'utilisation
4 / 5
Fonctionnalités
3 / 5
Support client
4 / 5
Rapport qualité-prix
Probabilité de recommander le produit :
Très faible Très élevée

Avantages: We purchased this program primarily for the scheduling functions. Coordinating multiple clinical trials in a small space with visits requiring patients to see multiple staff in multiple rooms requires more sophistication than we could manage. Having a program that schedules each element for us saves time and ensures that we are using staff and space as efficiently as possible.

Inconvénients: The software is incredibly detailed, but that also makes it complicated. We've found that it generally takes staff 3-6 months to become proficient in navigating the system and even longer for staff to master it.

Lire d'autres avis