17 ans à aider les entreprises françaises
à choisir le meilleur logiciel

Description de CarePaths EHR

Le système eRecord est le dossier médical partagé de santé comportementale cloud certifié ONC le plus abordable (44,75 millions de dollars), incluant la documentation clinique, la comptabilité des patients, les demandes intégrées, l'ordonnancement avec rappels par e-mail, la prescription électronique (y compris les substances contrôlées et les analyses), la télépsychiatrie, la messagerie sécurisée, les résultats, le reporting, le portail des patients, et bien plus encore. Les cliniciens peuvent mener la téléthérapie à partir de leur navigateur. Il est facile et sécurisé et ne nécessite pas de plug-ins ou de téléchargements

Qui utilise CarePaths EHR ?

Cliniciens et cabinets de santé comportementale.

CarePaths EHR Logiciel - 1
CarePaths EHR Logiciel - 2
CarePaths EHR Logiciel - 3
CarePaths EHR Logiciel - 4
CarePaths EHR Logiciel - 5

CarePaths EHR ne vous convainc pas tout à fait ? Comparer avec une alternative populaire

CarePaths EHR

CarePaths EHR

3,8 (34)
10,00 $US
mois
Version gratuite
Version d'essai gratuite
101
Intégrations introuvables
3,5 (34)
4,2 (34)
3,5 (34)
VS.
À partir de
Types de licence
Fonctionnalités
Intégrations
Facilité d'utilisation
Rapport qualité-prix
Service client
700,00 $US
mois
Version gratuite
Version d'essai gratuite
81
Intégrations introuvables
4,8 (402)
4,8 (402)
4,9 (402)
Les jauges horizontales vertes représentent le logiciel le plus apprécié selon la note globale qui lui a été attribuée ainsi que le nombre d'avis.

Alternatives à CarePaths EHR

EHR YOUR WAY
Fonctionnalités les mieux notées
Conforme HIPAA
Dossier médical informatisé et partagé
Pour la santé comportementale/mentale
Valant EHR Suite
Fonctionnalités les mieux notées
Conforme HIPAA
Dossier médical informatisé et partagé
Pour la santé comportementale/mentale
CharmHealth
Fonctionnalités les mieux notées
Conforme HIPAA
Gestion des dossiers patients
Graphiques
Qualifacts Insync
Fonctionnalités les mieux notées
Conforme HIPAA
Gestion des réclamations
Graphiques
RXNT
Fonctionnalités les mieux notées
Conforme HIPAA
Facturation
Prescription électronique
Pabau
Fonctionnalités les mieux notées
Gestion des dossiers patients
Gestion des rendez-vous
Planification des patients
PrognoCIS
Fonctionnalités les mieux notées
Conforme HIPAA
Facturation médicale
Prescription électronique
Nexus EHR
Fonctionnalités les mieux notées
Graphiques
Interopérabilité clinique
À des fins médicales
Alleva
Fonctionnalités les mieux notées
Conforme HIPAA
Gestion des documents
Graphiques

Avis sur CarePaths EHR

Note moyenne

Note globale
3,8
Facilité d'utilisation
3,5
Service client
3,5
Fonctionnalités
3,7
Rapport qualité-prix
4,2

Avis classés par taille de l'entreprise (nombre d'employés)

  • <50
  • 51-200
  • 201-1 000
  • >1 001

Trouver les avis classés par note

5
18%
4
53%
3
21%
2
9%
Mary Ann
Mary Ann
Psychiatric Nurse Practitioner (É.-U.)
Utilisateur LinkedIn vérifié
Temps d'utilisation du logiciel : plus de deux ans
Source de l'avis

This is a terrific program! Great support!!!

5,0 il y a 7 ans

Commentaires : Ease of charting and prescribing.

Avantages :

Ease of finding appropriate templates for charting and the ease of prescribing. I prescribe daily and the program is excellent.

Inconvénients :

Would like to have the ability to do prior auths when I am in the patient's chart. Currently I have to go to another site to do that. Also, would like to be able to fax more notes than 5 at each time. Many of my records are lengthly and numerous. It takes a lot of extra time to have to fax 5 charts at a time.

Utilisateur vérifié
Utilisateur LinkedIn vérifié
Temps d'utilisation du logiciel : plus de deux ans
Source de l'avis

I like using EHR. Disappointed that Carepaths stopped having rates for part time therapists.

4,0 il y a 7 ans

Avantages :

It's very easy to fill out clinical notes and file insurance claim forms. I also can get EOBs online and have them posted to clients' accounts. There is the ability to use video therapy which I have done a couple times. I can't really compare this to other EHRs

Inconvénients :

I started out paying as a part time therapist. Carepaths has now stopped having a part time fee and so I now pay high amount. That's a huge jump for someone seeing around 8 clients per week. I know I could stop using them, but now that all my clients are listed there, it's difficult to stop. Other cons: when I see a couple, I have to set up two accounts for them to fill out paperwork as there isn't a way to have two signatures on Carepath's consent forms. Also, the clinical forms have a space to put in the client's next appointment but then that appointment time doesn't automatically transfer to the scheduling page. Carepaths doesn't ask for user feedback about usability. There have been several major software changes, but never did they ask users what we think might be useful.

Akash
Owner Psychiatrist (É.-U.)
Psychologie, 11–50 employés
Temps d'utilisation du logiciel : plus de deux ans
Source de l'avis

Alternatives envisagées précédemment :

Very serious hidden issues which they are not open about

2,0 il y a 5 ans

Avantages :

The main feature is the low price, considering all of the advertised features. The simple interface appealed to us as well. I think this EMR would be fine for any clinician who is NOT sending claims to insurance or paying other clinicians on a fee split.

Inconvénients :

- They are not open about the reports not working. If you need to pay clinicians on a fee split, they will tell you that you can run reports to do it, but the reports they tell you to run do not accurately calculate pay. I have told them repeatedly they need to let any other group practices know that they are NOT paying clinicians correctly, but they act like it's not a big deal. Obviously they do not have a lot of money budgeted for programming and the poor customer service people have to cover for this. - ERAs will very regularly NOT come in, despite us getting paid by insurance. We spend countless hours monthly calling BCBS manually to sort this out. When we identify what ERAs are missing, we then need to MANUALLY post those ERAs into the system. I am paying for double the clerical staff that other practices my size utlilize. - There are issues with ERAs double allocating or over allocating, though accounting won't reflect this. So if you took too much copay, and then apply an insurance payment, it will let you apply an excess to the charge and the balance will show as $0. Now your accounting is off - There are basic features you'd expect which are not there. For instance, you can't turn off the messaging feature in the portal. - Their invoicing does not do a good job of separating people with real balances from people for whom you are waiting for insurance payment.

ROBYN
LCSW (É.-U.)
Psychologie, Auto-entrepreneur
Temps d'utilisation du logiciel : plus de deux ans
Source de l'avis

Overall positive

4,0 il y a 7 ans

Commentaires : Purchased it primarily for my own practice. Others have joined, fairly easy to teach others.

Avantages :

ease of use for billing and note taking. Availability of video. Access to eob's from medicare. The customer support is always helpful and responsive.

Inconvénients :

Sometimes hard to get assistance (other times I barely wait an hour). When regulations change, for example icd 10, updates were not timely. I find accounting section to be too burdensome and use an excel spreadsheet instead. Not happy with that either. Would like to see something that is more user friendly for accounting. Would also like to have calendar synced with google calendar or have the carepath one on my telephone. The calendar is another feature I do not use as I need to have access to it all the time. Wish I could dictate my notes, I hear another program has this feature.

Krista
CEO (É.-U.)
Santé, bien-être et fitness, 11–50 employés
Temps d'utilisation du logiciel : plus de deux ans
Source de l'avis

Very user-friendly!

4,0 il y a 2 ans

Commentaires : Very positive

Avantages :

Ease of use, easy to train people on, straight-forward

Inconvénients :

Not very pretty, needs more design, boring interface