Pour qui ?

Gestionnaires de projet, analystes commerciaux et responsables de l'assurance qualité (QA) à la recherche d'un système ALM intégré qui leur permette de gérer l'ensemble de leur projet, depuis les besoins initiaux jusqu'à la livraison en passant par les tests.

Notes moyennes

86 avis
  • Note globale 4 / 5
  • Facilité d'utilisation 4 / 5
  • Service client 4.5 / 5
  • Fonctionnalités 4.5 / 5
  • Rapport qualité-prix 4.5 / 5

Informations sur le produit

  • À partir de $15.99/mois
  • Version gratuite Non
  • Version d'essai gratuite Oui, obtenez un essai gratuit
  • Déploiement Cloud, SaaS, web
    Installation (Windows)
  • Formation Webinaires
    Documentation
  • Ressources d'aide Support en horaire de bureau
    En ligne

Informations sur l'éditeur

  • Inflectra
  • http://www.inflectra.com
  • Fondé en 2006

En savoir plus sur SpiraTeam

SpiraTeam est un système ALM (Application Lifecycle Management) intégré qui gère les besoins, les versions, les cas types, les problèmes et les tâches de votre projet dans un environnement unifié.

Avec des tableaux de bord personnalisables intégrés contenant les informations principales du projet, SpiraTeam vous permet de prendre le contrôle de l'ensemble du cycle de vie de votre projet et de synchroniser les mondes autrefois séparés du développement et des tests.

SpiraTeam - Fonctionnalités

  • Brainstorming
  • Calendriers des groupes
  • Chat et messagerie
  • Conférences audio et vidéo
  • Correction synchrone
  • Forums de discussion
  • Gestion de contenu
  • Gestion de projets
  • Gestion de versions
  • Gestion des contacts
  • Gestion des documents
  • Gestion des tâches
  • Écriture coopérative
  • Contrôle de niveau administrateur
  • Examen des exigences
  • Gestion de projets
  • Gestion de versions
  • Gestion des niveaux utilisateur
  • Gestion des tâches
  • Gestion des versions
  • Planification de l'itération
  • Suivi des cas de test
  • Suivi des problèmes
  • Gestion de la conception
  • Gestion de la conformité
  • Gestion de projets
  • Gestion des changements
  • Gestion des documents
  • Gestion des exigences
  • Gestion des fournisseurs
  • PDM (product data management)
  • Suivi des coûts
  • Filtrage
  • Gestion des backlogs
  • Gestion des billets
  • Gestion des flux de travail
  • Gestion des tâches
  • Gestion des versions
  • Suivi des problèmes

Avis les plus utiles sur SpiraTeam

Pretty Good!

Traduire avec Google Translate Publié le 14/12/2016
Tom E.
QA Engineer
Télécommunications, 1 001-5 000 employés
Temps d'utilisation du produit: plus de deux ans
Provenance de l'utilisateur 
Source : asdf
4/5
Note globale
3 / 5
Facilité d'utilisation
4 / 5
Fonctionnalités
4 / 5
Support client
5 / 5
Rapport qualité-prix
Probabilité de recommander le produit :
Très faible Très élevée

Commentaires: Overall, I like SpiraTeam. There's a bunch of different ALM solutions out there. I prefer something easy of a lot of confusing functionality. SpiraTeam is somewhere in the middle. It has a good balance. I use it for keeping track of test cases, but don't use the requirements functionality. I wish we did use the Requirement functionality, but the developers I work with have a thing about NOT documenting what they are developing... In any case, I can produce the results of the test effort rather easily so the rest of the team can see where we are within the project.
Some of the annoyances are the ability to produce a report and distribute to the rest of the team. With the templates that SpiraTeam provides, I would like something a lit bit different. The templates just don't provide the information that I need. I know there is a way to modify the templates, but never had time to devote to figure it out. Also, the way arranging tests in folders and then moving tests around in the folders has been difficult over the versions of SpiraTeam. I like how tests are arranged in that way. It helps keep everything organized in a good manner, but the implementation of it is not entirely perfect. test cases often get put in the wrong place and have to spend some time moving them around. My last annoyance is how test cases are copied and pasted. When pasting a test case, it places it on the top of the test case I copied, not underneath it. That bugs me more than anything.
But when judging SpiraTeam as a whole, I do like the product, but it's those little interface annoyances that get in the way.

Avantages: I like the concept of how test cases are arranged, within folders.

Inconvénients: I don't like how the concept of the folders was implemented. Often times, when copying and pasting test cases, it gets placed in the wrong location. Have to spend extra time getting test cases and folders placed in the right location.

Réponse de l'éditeur

envoyé par Inflectra le 14/12/2016

Hi Tom
Thanks so much for the very fair and detailed review, we appreciate the time you spent writing it.
I would like to mention that in SpiraTeam v5.0 we completely overhauled the test case and test set folders in line with the issues you identified, so please try out the newest version and let us know if you have any suggestions or feedback.

Requirements and Test Management in one place

Traduire avec Google Translate Publié le 02/12/2016
Tammy B.
Provenance de l'utilisateur 
Source : asdf
4/5
Note globale
4 / 5
Facilité d'utilisation
4 / 5
Fonctionnalités
4 / 5
Support client
5 / 5
Rapport qualité-prix

Commentaires: The primary goal of the software we were looking for was the management of requirements and testing along with a built-in traceability matrix and reports. SpiraTeam included these at a reasonable cost. We purchased the 4.2 version and have not upgraded to the latest. We like the feature that not only maps the requirement to test case(s) but also indicates how many of the associated test cases have passed/failed. The filtering on tables for Requirements, Test Cases and Incidents is very helpful. Also like the folder and subfolder concepts to easily group system features. We have not used the Test Sets feature. We've been able to generate requirements and test reports and make some modifications. I am not a developer so this was a bit challenging and was not able to figure out how to create a report for bugs not linked to test cases. SpiraTeam does have a report showing Test Cases with associated incidents of which I was able to expand to get additional incident information other than just the ID. They have a handful of other reports as well. We used several administrative features. Adding new users and projects is fairly easy and straight forward. We configured the Incident work steps (workflow) to meet our business workflow (e.g., added Works as Designed and Close (by Design)), added some custom fields and adjusted field properties (e.g., hide, require) per the workstep. We used the email notifications feature as well. We also synchronized with Jira but abandoned this. We could not get the components to map but mostly because after trying it, we found it much easier to manage defects in one system for our internal processes. Once a bug is synchronized and written to Jira, you can only update it from Jira, not SpiraTeam. It would be nice to have a feature that lets you know when a test case should be retested because the associated bugs are fixed. Customer Service is responsive and professional. Sometimes I found answers to my questions on their Knowledge Base. Overall good experience. Really helps to see that requirements are covered by test cases and gives the ability to manage test case (pass/fail) in one place without having to use spreadsheets!

Lire d'autres avis