17 ans à aider les entreprises françaises
à choisir le meilleur logiciel

Description de Oracle Ambulatory EHR

Les dossiers médicaux partagés PowerChart Ambulatory de Cerner garantissent que les bons médecins ont les bonnes informations au bon moment et au bon endroit pour prendre les meilleures décisions possible. Grâce à la technologie de l'information et à la coordination, les soins de santé deviennent plus sûrs, plus efficaces et plus disponibles pour les collectivités du monde entier.

Qui utilise Oracle Ambulatory EHR ?

Médecins, infirmières et administrateurs au cabinet du praticien, en ambulatoire.

Oracle Ambulatory EHR ne vous convainc pas tout à fait ? Comparer avec une alternative populaire

Oracle Ambulatory EHR

Oracle Ambulatory EHR

3,8 (160)
Prix introuvable
Version gratuite
Version d'essai gratuite
33
Intégrations introuvables
3,5 (160)
3,5 (160)
3,6 (160)
VS.
À partir de
Types de licence
Fonctionnalités
Intégrations
Facilité d'utilisation
Rapport qualité-prix
Service client
Prix introuvable
Version gratuite
Version d'essai gratuite
35
Intégrations introuvables
4,0 (376)
4,0 (376)
4,2 (376)
Les jauges horizontales vertes représentent le logiciel le plus apprécié selon la note globale qui lui a été attribuée ainsi que le nombre d'avis.

Alternatives à Oracle Ambulatory EHR

Epic
Fonctionnalités les mieux notées
Conforme HIPAA
Graphiques
Portail client
AVATAR
Fonctionnalités les mieux notées
Aucune fonctionnalité n'a été évaluée par les utilisateurs de ce logiciel.
Helix
Fonctionnalités les mieux notées
Aucune fonctionnalité n'a été évaluée par les utilisateurs de ce logiciel.
MedEZ
Fonctionnalités les mieux notées
Aucune fonctionnalité n'a été évaluée par les utilisateurs de ce logiciel.
NextGen Office
Fonctionnalités les mieux notées
Facturation
Gestion des réclamations
Vérification de l'admissibilité à l'assurance
RXNT
Fonctionnalités les mieux notées
Conforme HIPAA
Prescription électronique
Signature électronique
PrognoCIS
Fonctionnalités les mieux notées
Conforme HIPAA
Facturation médicale
Prescription électronique
PracticeSuite
Fonctionnalités les mieux notées
Information aux patients
Messagerie
Planification de traitements à distance
Nexus EHR
Fonctionnalités les mieux notées
Accès mobile
Conforme HIPAA
Graphiques

Avis sur Oracle Ambulatory EHR

Note moyenne

Note globale
3,8
Facilité d'utilisation
3,5
Service client
3,6
Fonctionnalités
3,6
Rapport qualité-prix
3,5

Avis classés par taille de l'entreprise (nombre d'employés)

  • <50
  • 51-200
  • 201-1 000
  • >1 001

Trouver les avis classés par note

5
27%
4
39%
3
24%
2
4%
1
6%
Miguel
Miguel
Research Assistant (É.-U.)
Utilisateur LinkedIn vérifié
Hôpitaux et soins de santé, 10 000+ employés
Temps d'utilisation du logiciel : 6 à 12 mois
Source de l'avis
Source : GetApp

Functional Software that plays an important role in the healthcare field

5,0 il y a 4 ans

Commentaires : Overall, i have had a pleasant experience with this software, it is definitely user friendly and provides healthcare workers a variety of tools that make charting much easier. Also, it is extremely easy to find information about a specific patient due to the fact that it has different sections with up to date information about the patient and that takes off a lot of times from reading the physician's documentation, at least on my current job position. I highly recommend this software!

Avantages :

I work in the healthcare industry and use this tool on a daily basis. The software contains a variety of tools that allow healthcare workers to document patient's visits very easily and it is very user friendly. Moreover, it is an extremely well developed software where you are able to navigate through patient's chart, test results, patient's scheduled visits and many other tools that healthcare providers use to get acquaintance with the personal history of the patient. In regards to my position, the Oncology flowchart provides me with information about the cancer staging, treatment name and dates, BMI and lab results. It is a highly functional tool with multi faceted use.

Inconvénients :

In order for the software to function correctly, massive amount of updates need to happen monthly from the IT team in my organization. It can be very glitchy sometimes or freeze when there are large amount of information, for example, the MAR section freezes a lot. But other than that, it is highly functional and well developed software.

Utilisateur vérifié
Utilisateur LinkedIn vérifié
Hôpitaux et soins de santé, 11–50 employés
Temps d'utilisation du logiciel : 6 à 12 mois
Source de l'avis

harder to get used to after using EPIC for EHRs

4,0 il y a 6 ans

Commentaires : I learned to use it and I think with more time I will get better as always, but the learning curve was a bit different from EPIC charting which seemed to be more color coded, and easier to navigate, but also full of facility wide things that had to be filled out but didn't apply to the patient, so that was cumbersome.

Avantages :

It is easy to use once you get to know where things are located, but it has more of a windows software feel than a mac software. It is more utilitarian in that it is not colored and the font is small, which is good for efficiency in documenting once you know where things go and are located. Does not have hangups that EPIC has when company wide documenting is required for certain areas that sometimes do not apply to particular patient such as was the case on a pediatric floor where I was using this system and I appreciated not having EPIC.

Inconvénients :

Hard to get used to. I was coming from using EPIC mostly, which seems easier and more intuitive to learn. I found the smaller black boxes and hidden tabs harder to get used to when trying to document daily things. As a nurse the med administration tab wasn't as easy to use as it is in EPIC and wasn't as intuitive and I sometimes messed up at first in documenting med administration especially when trying to add something that wasn't scanning from the pharmacy and I had to do an override.

Nicolas
child, adolescent and adult psychiatrist (É.-U.)
Psychologie, 501–1 000 employés
Temps d'utilisation du logiciel : 6 à 12 mois
Source de l'avis

Extremely poor value for the money

2,0 il y a 8 ans

Commentaires : The user experience is completely not user-friendly, often needing ongoing clarification for what are basic searching or to complete basic routine activities. Amazingly poor UX/UI layout, and often confusing. The customer services has been all along a nightmare. For more than two months initially in March 2016 when we wanted to start this system we were forced to keep calling in prescriptions to pharmacies & writing controlled medicines for 5 days because the system wasn't working -and Cerner telling us they didn't know what was the problem. Later on when we were eventually able to e-prescribe non-controlled substances still we were forced to get a NY State waiver for controlled substances because the company couldn't get it resolved in more than a month longer. Worse, they blamed our IT team here when was clear it wasn't the case. This was more frustrating as this was happening while we're busy seen patients. Support was spotty at best, often the IT people been forced to resolve the problems themselves, or improvise, while the agency I'm working was paying Cerner money. Even now (10/18/2016), the e-prescribe system, that claims it has a renewal option for old medications, it doesn't work for controlled substances (some do, some don't) , so many of us have always to re-write as a new prescription all controlled medicines. I'm a psychiatrist but I've also some formal training in UX/UI design, and to write code, so I'm probably better understanding computers than the usual MD, and even for me the system was an impossible crazy task. I also work with other e-prescribe systems in other agencies, and comparing apples to apples, the other systems are much cheaper and much, much better, and very much easier to use. It's amazing how poor service you can get paying big bucks! And here, this is one glaring example. Buyer beware!

Avantages :

Easier to write progress notes.

Inconvénients :

What I wrote about e-prescribe.

Utilisateur vérifié
Utilisateur LinkedIn vérifié
Hôpitaux et soins de santé, 10 000+ employés
Temps d'utilisation du logiciel : plus de deux ans
Source de l'avis

Powerchart review

5,0 il y a 6 ans

Commentaires : Once you learn Cerner Powerchart, it is a great software, very user friendly, organized, easy to navigate.

Avantages :

I use this software at work to access patients charts, send messages to other healthcare team members, and to document. Charting is very easy, software flows well. There are lots of shortcuts that make work faster. Pages can be customized to make everyone’s work more efficient and personalized. Search buttons within patients charts are also very useful when learning more about their medical and medication history. This software makes patients’ chart very well organized, easy to find all the necessary information, easy to look up and updated patients’ information such as pharmacy, medications, allergies.

Inconvénients :

Frequent software updates are often times less useful and more confusing than previous version, takes some time to learn and get used to it. In some cases support team needs to be contacted to reverse or modify new updates for software to be more user friendly. Occasionally there are problems with the serve, errors when logging in, which are addressed by support team in a timely matter.

Utilisateur vérifié
Utilisateur LinkedIn vérifié
Hôpitaux et soins de santé, 10 000+ employés
Temps d'utilisation du logiciel : plus de deux ans
Source de l'avis

Cross functional amazing

4,0 il y a 6 ans

Avantages :

Everyone could use it to serve the patient the best, from in house staff registering and obtain images of id's or insurance information, to providers to document patient's care and keep reports, to billing departments for insurance verification or printing medical reports. It was a 1 stop shop for medical purposes.

Inconvénients :

Training was non me, i learned everything on my own. But that could of been a company decision and not a software issue.