Description de Sibme

Sibme permet aux équipes, aux écoles, aux institutions et aux organisations d'apprentissage de créer des expériences d'apprentissage significatives, axées sur les personnes et interactives.

Permettez des conversations plus fréquentes et plus authentiques sur le travail que vous effectuez quotidiennement et améliorez les compétences de vos équipes dès aujourd'hui.

Qui utilise Sibme ?

Sibme gère les programmes d'enseignement primaire et secondaire, d'enseignement supérieur et d'apprentissage et de développement des entreprises.

Sibme Logiciel - 1
Sibme Logiciel - 2

Sibme ne vous convainc pas tout à fait ? Comparer avec une alternative populaire

Sibme

Sibme

4,6 (194)
Indisponible dans votre pays
Prix introuvable
Version gratuite
Version d'essai gratuite
42
7
4,4 (194)
4,4 (194)
4,7 (194)
VS.
À partir de
Types de licence
Fonctionnalités
Intégrations
Facilité d'utilisation
Rapport qualité-prix
Service client
Prix introuvable
Version gratuite
Version d'essai gratuite
106
30
4,4 (220)
4,4 (220)
4,4 (220)

Alternatives à Sibme

Alemira
Fonctionnalités les mieux notées
Parcours et suivi d'apprentissage
Portail des apprenants
Tests et évaluations
Absorb LMS
Fonctionnalités les mieux notées
Gestion des cours
Portail des apprenants
Suivi des cours
YouTube Mentions
Fonctionnalités les mieux notées
Analyse des sentiments
Social listening
GoReact
Fonctionnalités les mieux notées
Notation
Rapports et analyses
Évaluation des compétences
SkyPrep
Fonctionnalités les mieux notées
Gestion de l'apprentissage
Portail des apprenants
Tests et évaluations
Tovuti
Fonctionnalités les mieux notées
Apprentissage mixte
Gestion des cours
Suivi des cours
Moodle
Fonctionnalités les mieux notées
Gestion de l'apprentissage
Gestion des cours
Tests et évaluations
Litmos
Fonctionnalités les mieux notées
Gestion des cours
Portail des apprenants
Tests et évaluations
CANVAS
Fonctionnalités les mieux notées
Gestion des cours
Portail étudiant
Suivi des cours

Avis sur Sibme

Note moyenne

Note globale
4,6
Facilité d'utilisation
4,4
Service client
4,7
Fonctionnalités
4,5
Rapport qualité-prix
4,4

Avis classés par taille de l'entreprise (nombre d'employés)

  • <50
  • 51-200
  • 201-1 000
  • >1 001

Trouver les avis classés par note

5
72%
4
23%
3
5%
2
1%
Sean
Sean
Head of Schools
Utilisateur LinkedIn vérifié
Gestion de l'enseignement, 501–1 000 employés
Temps d'utilisation du logiciel : plus d'un an
Source de l'avis

Great Platform for Schools

4,0 il y a 2 ans
Sous-titres en français disponibles pour la vidéo
Utilisateur vérifié
Utilisateur LinkedIn vérifié
Gestion de l'enseignement, 1 001–5 000 employés
Temps d'utilisation du logiciel : plus de deux ans
Source de l'avis

Works well with struggling teachers

5,0 il y a 2 ans

Avantages :

This software works well when trying to develop struggling teachers. It allows you to give them feedback from actual lessons with the chance for them to see themselves. True growth can occur when used correctly.

Inconvénients :

Its a little hard to configure in the beginning but smooth after you play with it for a while...

Allisn
Educational Consultant (É.-U.)
Gestion de l'enseignement, 501–1 000 employés
Temps d'utilisation du logiciel : plus de deux ans
Source de l'avis

Comprehensive and private

5,0 il y a 2 ans

Commentaires : Great! As an instructional coach, private conversations that are non-evaluative need lead to growth. Teachers can be more vulnerable when looking at evidence when they know it is between us and that the evidence is there when they are in the coaching cycle.

Avantages :

The tool allows for private goal setting, communication, and evidence collection.

Inconvénients :

As a stand-alone and private tool, in education, it can feel like “one more thing.” I have to emphasize the fact that privacy features also mean it is self-contained.

Kyler
Sr Associate, Core Model Operations (É.-U.)
Gestion de l'enseignement, 51–200 employés
Temps d'utilisation du logiciel : 6 à 12 mois
Source de l'avis

Strong Mission and Responsive Staff, but Glitchy Product

3,0 il y a 2 ans

Commentaires : It's a promising platform that has helped us unlock sharing potential in our organization. However, it feels on shaky technological ground for the ways our team uses it. As the administration liaison, I spend too much time putting out small fires and trying to understand what is a Sibme issue versus something a team member is doing wrong.

Avantages :

The core features are usually solid and intuitive to new users - adding team members, uploading and commenting on videos. As an education leadership coaching organization with over 50 coaches, we have used Sibme to help our coaches re-watch and improve upon their own practices by letting development conversations be grounded in real examples of their work. Plus, other non-coaching staff now have an easy window into coaching without pestering coaches! In our COVID virtual coaching environment, grounding org learning in video sharing was invaluable. It saves everyone time and the collaboration features to enhance this org learning (commenting, sharing, tagging pre-set categories) are easy to use.

Inconvénients :

Though the core service is solid, I encounter tech glitches and question marks at a frustratingly high rate. It's small things - user permission mismatch across pages, confusing naming conventions (the account wide "Admin-User-Viewer" and Huddle-level "Admin-Member-Viewer" have very similar names but different meanings, which is confusing), audio issues for uploads, and several areas of confusion or disconnect in the new Zoom-Sibme "Conference" integration. This latter piece would have been excellent to use in the COVID virtual coaching environment, but was troublesome enough that our team never meaningfully used the integration. More robust and coherent help guides on the Zoom-Sibme integration (with video!) would be a good start. Our customer service manager is very responsive and solutions-oriented and I'm grateful for her! But technical solutions seem slow and often incomplete.

Patrick
Director of Teacher Induction and Development North Carolina New Teacher Support Program (É.-U.)
Gestion de l'enseignement, 51–200 employés
Temps d'utilisation du logiciel : 1 à 5 mois
Source de l'avis

Alternatives envisagées :

Ease of implementation - multiple industry uses

5,0 il y a 2 ans

Commentaires : We have been thoroughly pleased with the product and would recommend to others in higher ed or responsible for supporting early career teachers.

Avantages :

Very intuitive user interface, security/mobility of content, multiple uses to support interaction between small groups of educators or to support large conference-style events, efficiencies built into product and customizable by responsive development team.

Inconvénients :

Communication from within the system to end users can be excessive - ability to opt out of messages is a feature but less prominent in the user interface. Some analytics of interest are not yet available, but responsiveness of development team speaks to SIBME's ability to be adaptive.

Rebecca
Associate Professor (É.-U.)
Enseignement supérieur, 201–500 employés
Temps d'utilisation du logiciel : plus d'un an
Source de l'avis

Cal U Review

5,0 il y a 2 ans

Commentaires : I love Sibme. It has made my work more seamless, provided more options for coaching teacher candidates, and allowed me to continue to do my job efficiently when I wouldn't be able to otherwise (e.g., video-coach during the pandemic when schools weren't allowing visitors). It has allowed me and my colleagues to develop new assignments in my courses, particularly peer-observation. It has also made a once excruciating assignment (video-recording yourself teaching) an acceptable and desirable task. Moreover, the customer service is wonderful! [SENSITIVE CONTENT HIDDEN] have been so helpful, and I appreciate that they keep me on my toes with check-ins. I also appreciate all of the Learning Center material.

Avantages :

Sibme as alot of great features that are useful for my work with teachers candidates. It's particularly impactful in supporting teacher candidate growth through the video-recording and time-stamped feedback. It's also useful for the supervisor to document strengths and needs for the candidates. I particularly like that I can attached my feedback to our clinical practice tool that I entered into the platform. Also, I like the different options it provides for observations (live, scripted notes, video-recording). Moreover, Sibme is always coming out with features that are helpful to my work. For example, I'm excited to learn more about the Goals feature. We require our candidates to develop a professional growth plan based on goals that they have been working on, and the Goals feature is a tool that I believe could support that task.

Inconvénients :

I'd like to be able to obtain more data analytics on teacher candidate performance based on my inputs. For example, being able to look at the data for cohorts of teachers rather than just individuals. Overall, I feel like I'm still learning about the software, so I may not be using the data analytics to its full extent.