Description de Amazon RDS

Amazon Relational Database Service (RDS) facilite la configuration, l'exploitation et la mise à l'échelle d'une base de données dans le cloud. Ce service offre une capacité de redimensionnement économique tout en automatisant les tâches d'administration fastidieuses telles que le provisionnement matériel, la configuration, les correctifs et les sauvegardes. Cela vous permet de vous concentrer sur vos applications. Amazon RDS est disponible sur plusieurs types d'instances de bases de données (optimisées pour la mémoire, les performances ou les E/S) et vous offre six moteurs de base de données familiers au choix.

Qui utilise Amazon RDS ?

Développeurs d'applications, administrateurs de bases de données, administrateurs système, ingénieurs DevOps.

Amazon RDS Logiciel - 1 Amazon RDS Logiciel - 2 Amazon RDS Logiciel - 3

Amazon RDS ne vous convainc pas tout à fait ?
Comparer avec une alternative populaire

Amazon RDS

4,7 (192)
Amazon RDS
0,01 $US
mois
Version gratuite
Version d'essai gratuite
21
2
4,4 (192)
4,3 (192)
4,4 (192)
VS.
À partir de
Types de licence
Fonctionnalités
Intégrations
Facilité d'utilisation
Rapport qualité-prix
Service client
Prix introuvable
Version gratuite
Version d'essai gratuite
102
9
4,4 (1 579)
4,4 (1 579)
4,3 (1 579)

Alternatives à Amazon RDS

Google Cloud
Fonctionnalités les mieux notées
Gestion du stockage de données
Sauvegarde et récupération
Stockage sécurisé des données
MariaDB
Fonctionnalités les mieux notées
Compatible avec divers languages de programmation
Gestion du stockage de données
Sauvegarde et récupération
Microsoft Azure
Fonctionnalités les mieux notées
Cloud computing
Contrôles/Permissions d'accès
Sécurité des données
Microsoft SQL Server
Fonctionnalités les mieux notées
Analyse des performances
Gestion du stockage de données
Sauvegarde et récupération
Caspio
Fonctionnalités les mieux notées
Création et conception de formulaires
Migration de données
Planification et programmation de projets
Oracle Database
Fonctionnalités les mieux notées
Contrôles/Permissions d'accès
Gestion du stockage de données
Sauvegarde et récupération
MySQL
Fonctionnalités les mieux notées
Contrôles/Permissions d'accès
Gestion du stockage de données
Sauvegarde et récupération
Quickbase
Fonctionnalités les mieux notées
Gestion du stockage de données
Planification et programmation de projets
Reporting et suivi de projet
Apache Cassandra
Fonctionnalités les mieux notées
Compatible avec divers languages de programmation
Réplication de données

Avis sur Amazon RDS

Note moyenne

Note globale
4,7
Facilité d'utilisation
4,4
Service client
4,4
Fonctionnalités
4,6
Rapport qualité-prix
4,3

Avis classés par taille de l'entreprise (nombre d'employés)

  • <50
  • 51-200
  • 201-1 000
  • >1 001

Trouver les avis classés par note

5
74%
4
25%
3
1%
Monish
Monish
senior software engineer (É.-U.)
Utilisateur LinkedIn vérifié
Logiciels, 1 001-5 000 employés
Temps d'utilisation du logiciel : plus de deux ans
Source de l'avis

Cost Effective and Fully Cloud Managed Relational Database Service

5,0 il y a 3 ans

Commentaires : Had A Really Great Experience with RDS, I have been evaluating Aurora with Native RDS so i will be talking more about Aurora in this Review

Avantages :

RDS provides support for verity of database systems like mysql, postgreSql, Maria DB, Oracle, Microsoft Sql and a hybrid Aurora (supports both mysql & psql) Resizing, network management processes like subnet and security group are easily manageable. Using Aurora it has become easy to transfer data from DB to S3 using "INTO OUTFILE S3" query Aurora is really faster when it comes to executing heavy flock of query simultaneously when compared with its native RDS, it increases the over all through put Aurora Server less is a extremely cost effective solution when used with proper configurations, it scales up and scales down as per its usage (pay per sec) Supports Auto Backing up and scheduled snapshotting which stores the DB snapshot in S3, which helps in recovery at times of data deleted by mistake or data corruption by some failure in the application etc Aurora provides Export Snapshot to S3 feature, its a additional feature towards data movement from RDS to S3, from this we can easily migrate data from RDS to Redshift or Athena via S3

Inconvénients :

Can't change subnet of a multi AZ RDS Database directly, to achieve this i had to first change my DB to single AZ Aurora Server less dose not scale up when used with low CPU utilising application, user should have given the flexibility to change the autoscaling parameter for Aurora server less (CPU utilisation 70%) Aurora the use of "INTO OUTFILE S3" query requires some additional setup steps at the s3 bucket end and IAM role which is well documented, but quite confusing, Aurora dose not support newer mysql or psql versions which are supported by its native RDS's Aurora when compared with its native RDS its slower for executing single queries, officers Aurora is really faster when it comes to executing heavy flock of query simultaneously, but at the least we expect Aurora to perform as the same level as its native RDS when it comes to single queries Aurora's Export Snapshot to S3 feature only supports Parquet file format, and on trigging Export it takes more time to start, it wold be better if the process starts instantaneously

Ana
Ana
Security Architecture Discipline leader (Espagne)
Utilisateur LinkedIn vérifié
Banque, 10 000+ employés
Temps d'utilisation du logiciel : plus d'un an
Source de l'avis

Alternatives envisagées :

High availability even for database beginners

4,0 il y a 7 mois

Commentaires : I am using it as a MySQL server. With a managed database server, almost everything can be configured by just operating the configuration screen, so it is recommended that even members with little knowledge of MySQL can create a high availability database infrastructure, such as creating a Master-Slave configuration. It was possible to significantly reduce the man-hours required to install and configure the DB supports in EC2 and the upgrade procedure for maintenance, and dedicate the man-hours to other design and construction work. Including a BD license, it has freed us from license management. In addition, by not needing a physical space, we are freed from the whole flow of purchasing it.

Avantages :

It is a pay-per-use system where you are only charged for the number of transactions that occur. Still, there is also a subscription system called Reserved Instances (RI), so instances that generate transactions frequently use this system to reduce costs significantly. There are three types to choose from: one-year prepayment, one-year prepayment, monthly payment, and no prepayment, depending on the kind of discount. Pay-per-use is basically cheaper for cases where transactions do not occur frequently, depending on the situation, so you can optimize the charge by using different payment methods depending on the application.

Inconvénients :

I would like you to provide a concrete fault test solution. If you do not have a high level of knowledge about RDS, you cannot be relieved that you cannot perform useful failure tests assuming a failure occurs.

Utilisateur vérifié
Senior Software Engineer (Inde)
Utilisateur LinkedIn vérifié
Services et technologies de l'information, 10 000+ employés
Temps d'utilisation du logiciel : plus de deux ans
Source de l'avis

Amazon RDS - All Your Databases at same place

5,0 il y a 2 mois

Commentaires : Great!

Avantages :

Amazon RDS provides the capability to host whichever database server customer wants, providing options like MS SQL , PostgreSQL, and have its own in house Aurora DB.With the Host and user/password simplified model like any other database it allows users who are not familiar with cloud to use it similarly.I have used Amazon RDS with all kind of databases and the way it optimizes costs and provides integration to logs is amazing.

Inconvénients :

Log and monitoring on the console could be improved and enhanced heavily

Aleksandr
Aleksandr
Principal software engineer (É.-U.)
Utilisateur LinkedIn vérifié
Logiciels, 11-50 employés
Temps d'utilisation du logiciel : plus de deux ans
Source de l'avis

Alternatives envisagées :

Will cost you all yourmoney.

3,0 il y a 2 ans

Commentaires : Easy to setup. Very expensive. Play great with other AWS services.
The main issue is that metrics collected manually will never meet AWS metrics which are used to bill your stack. And of course AWS point of view will be much costly. Their Enterprise Support can not understand why metrics extracted from DB itself do not meet billing metrics and will endlessly redirect you to yet another expert.

Avantages :

Requires minimum knowledge or time to set up the database. Everything you need is basically there. Documentation is fantastic. It just works and takes all the burden of infrastructure management from you. A handful of engines, version, and extensions to them are supprted. Integrated seamless to AWS infrastructure.

Inconvénients :

Price. It will literally eat 7/8 of your infrastructure budget. Metrics lies. Performance insight simply does not work. Note, this is an opinion of somebody who paid for AWS Enterprise support (sigh, that's me) Backups are not backups per se, this is filesystem rsync. So it is easy to end up with broken DB. Support is very poor.

Utilisateur vérifié
Chief Technology Officer (Kenya)
Utilisateur LinkedIn vérifié
Informatique et sécurité réseau, 11-50 employés
Temps d'utilisation du logiciel : 1 à 5 mois
Source de l'avis

Alternatives envisagées :

Dependable Database management solution

5,0 il y a 3 mois

Commentaires : Overall it has amazing control features and i have never experienced any kind of downtime with them, they also have very enhanced security features so data birch is out of the question.

Avantages :

I is easy to integrate and implement also the customer support is quite good when one is having problems with any of their features.Its also important to note that the backup and recovery are free if you turn on the automation feature

Inconvénients :

Auto backup is not automatically turned on so if one forgets to turn it on this might cause challenges in the long run, also i don't think its right even after paying for the solution upfront that one has to leave their financial information on the system