SpringCharts EHR

SpringCharts EHR

par Spring Medical Systems

Qui utilise SpringCharts EHR ?

Cloud-based EHR management platform that allows individual clinicians and small to medium medical facilities to manage and track workflow, appointments, patient charts, referrals, medication and more.

Description de SpringCharts EHR

Cloud-based EHR management platform that allows individual clinicians and small to large medical facilities to manage and track workflow, appointments, patient charts, referrals, prescriptions, medication, previous visits and more.

Informations sur SpringCharts EHR

Spring Medical Systems

http://www.springmedical.com

Fondé en 2001

Prix de SpringCharts EHR

SpringCharts EHR n'est pas disponible en version gratuite et ne propose pas d'essai gratuit. La version payante de SpringCharts EHR est disponible à partir de 4 000,00 $US/unique.

À partir de

4 000,00 $US/unique

Version gratuite

Non

Essai gratuit

Non

Déploiement

Cloud, SaaS, web

Formation

Aucune

Ressources d'aide

Support en horaire de bureau

SpringCharts EHR - Fonctionnalités

Logiciels de dossier patient informatisé
Certifié ONC-ATCB
Conforme HIPAA
Graphiques
Planification des rendez-vous
Portail libre-service
Prescription électronique
Reconnaissance de l'écriture manuscrite
Reconnaissance vocale
Suivi de la conformité
Utilisation significative certifiée

Avis sur SpringCharts EHR

Afficher 5 avis sur 9

Note globale
2,4/5
Facilité d'utilisation
2,8/5
Service client
2,3/5
Fonctionnalités
2,8/5
Rapport qualité-prix
3/5
Rosemary G.
Medical Receptionist
1 001-5 000 employés
Temps d'utilisation du produit: plus de deux ans
  • Note globale
    5/5
  • Facilité d'utilisation
    5/5
  • Fonctionnalités
    5/5
  • Support client
    5/5
  • Rapport qualité-prix
    5/5
  • Probabilité de recommander le produit
    10/10
  • Provenance de l'utilisateur 
  • Source : SoftwareAdvice
  • Publié le 05/10/2017

"EMR SYSTEM "

Avantages: THIS IS A PRETTY EASY AND SIMPLE SYSTEM. ALLOWING TO POINT OUT AND DRAW A MAP OF THE ANATOMY ON CHARTS.

  • Provenance de l'utilisateur 
  • Source : SoftwareAdvice
  • Publié le 05/10/2017
Martin S.
Manager
Hôpitaux et soins de santé, 13-50 employés
Temps d'utilisation du produit: plus de deux ans
  • Note globale
    4/5
  • Facilité d'utilisation
    3/5
  • Fonctionnalités
    4/5
  • Support client
    5/5
  • Rapport qualité-prix
    5/5
  • Probabilité de recommander le produit
    8/10
  • Provenance de l'utilisateur 
  • Publié le 19/09/2017

"Support ten years ago was good, went downhill for a long time but is excellent now."

Commentaires: Much better than paper.

Avantages: Great support now. It is server based so that you can keep records during retirement. The cost is low especially when compared to other applications. Our office has looked at quite a few other applications and for the cost and time spent customizing it we keep using it.

Inconvénients: Patient portal experience (don't use it anymore) Built for a mac, the finder is poor for attaching documents.

  • Provenance de l'utilisateur 
  • Publié le 19/09/2017
Erika M.
Administrative Director
Hôpitaux et soins de santé, 13-50 employés
Temps d'utilisation du produit: plus de deux ans
  • Note globale
    3/5
  • Facilité d'utilisation
    5/5
  • Fonctionnalités
    3/5
  • Support client
    2/5
  • Rapport qualité-prix
    3/5
  • Probabilité de recommander le produit
    4/10
  • Provenance de l'utilisateur 
  • Source : SoftwareAdvice
  • Publié le 09/01/2018

"Easy EHR for busy clinics"

Commentaires: Quick and easy software to operate on for small clinics.

Avantages: This software is very user friendly to all ages. The ease of moving through the chart quickly is a great feature as well.

Inconvénients: The system tends to freeze a lot once an update took place. Customer service was very difficult to get in touch with and sometimes would not call you back until two business days.

  • Provenance de l'utilisateur 
  • Source : SoftwareAdvice
  • Publié le 09/01/2018
Augustin B.
physician
  • Note globale
    4/5
  • Facilité d'utilisation
    5/5
  • Fonctionnalités
    Sans note
  • Support client
    4/5
  • Rapport qualité-prix
    Sans note
  • Probabilité de recommander le produit
    Sans note
  • Provenance de l'utilisateur 
  • Publié le 02/12/2013

"SpringCHarts by Spring Medical out of Houston, Texas"

Commentaires: My best guide has been chart auditors and temporary providers that have rotated through my practice. They invariably comment on the ease of use for all functions needed in daily practice. There are functions I have not implemented.... such as scanning directly into the EMR; but has because of prior set up routines. Incentive payments have been a breeze to qualify for. Good deal for the price.

  • Provenance de l'utilisateur 
  • Publié le 02/12/2013
Paul J.
Physician
Cabinets médicaux, 2-10 employés
Temps d'utilisation du produit: plus de deux ans
  • Note globale
    1/5
  • Facilité d'utilisation
    1/5
  • Fonctionnalités
    1/5
  • Support client
    1/5
  • Rapport qualité-prix
    1/5
  • Probabilité de recommander le produit
    Sans note
  • Provenance de l'utilisateur 
  • Source : SoftwareAdvice
  • Publié le 08/06/2017

"The worst EHR/EMR in regards to upgrades, updates, and customer service. Absolutely horrible and has cost me enormous amount of time and revenue."

Commentaires: This company seems so outdated and has been exhausting to work with. An example is the ICD 10 updates. When other colleagues stated they were ready for the deadline and conversion 6 months prior, Spring Medical was not even close to being prepared and barely at the eleventh hour, had minimal data supplied and of that data were the most unspecified codes that, to date, I am still having to performed data entry on a daily basis for specified codes for accuracy!! They have performed NO updates for coding or quality measures and ALL the work has been on our end. We are doing their job!! They are simply doing the bare minimum to qualify themselves as an EHR system and as stated earlier cost me precious time and revenue! It has become so bad that I am approaching legal counsel because this product has not worked as promised and am questioning their standard of performance despite claims in certification!

Inconvénients: The updates are minimal, the support is horrible, their knowledge regarding PQRS, CQM, MIPS reporting is minimal, and the system is universally flawed. Their cost, as I have come to find out through research, is higher than some of the higher rated and successful companies.

  • Provenance de l'utilisateur 
  • Source : SoftwareAdvice
  • Publié le 08/06/2017