qTest

Perfect tool for Agile management

Commentaires : Really well versed usability of the tool in the project. Used almost all the features mentioned in pros, helpful for scrum meetings, getting updates on time, good understanding of the names in tool like release, sprint, labels, etc., Reporting was very colorful for effective presentation, user management is very easy across projects.

Avantages :

Perfectly fit for agile projects, story board, customization of the product, reporting, bug management, reporting and analysis, user management, project milestones, color coding, flexible to upload/link attachments, shortcut keys for accessing items, integration with other market tools like blueprint, microsoft azure, caliber, etc.,

Inconvénients :

I liked all the features, least item is managing API code with postman tool and other coding features.

Great Testing Management for the Software QA engineers and Managers.

Commentaires : We moved from HP ALM over to qTest few years ago; it has been for us from night to day. The integration of the tool with Jira has helped the team to improve quality overall.Great to control the quality process and improve our test case development process

Avantages :

The ease of use.Be able to copy/paste images to test cases steps.Version control.Execution process.

Inconvénients :

Application updates for patching existing issues and new features takes way too long to wait.

Alternatives envisagées précédemment : Jira, Zephyr et TestRail

Pourquoi choisir qTest : HP costs

Pourquoi passer à qTest : Easy of use and quality of the product,This tool is completely dedicated to the Test Management

Review of qTest

Avantages :

The software was integrated with qTest to bring over requirements and create test cases and execute them in qTest. We were able to run queries to find specific modules and run specific test cases. We were also able to effectively track which test cases had been executed and the result of those test cases. Then, qTest created helpful infographics to help us further track how far along in the test execution process we were.

Inconvénients :

Sometimes, the requirements between qTest and JIRA did not sync well. There were many times where the number of requirements in each software was not the same. Along with this, some of the qTest add-ons such as Insights are very difficult to work with and not intuitive as normal data analysis tools.

Great Product

Commentaires : Its helping in ease of doing business and run the agile environment in a smooth way

Avantages :

I have been using qtest for a while and I really like it the way it has built up. The integration with jira allows to link JIRA issues against the Qtest which is helpful in overall visibility.

Inconvénients :

The recent removal of precondition/Prerequisite field I didn't like it. In recent version the test pre requisite you cannot add.

My Review of qTest-Test Management Tool

Commentaires : Overall experience excluding minor hiccups, network issues,was excellent. It provides a variety of options for test management both for Manual or Automation.

Avantages :

Intuitive UI,COLOR CODING, INTEGRATION WITH tools like JIRA, creates a clear link between the test case and the JIRA story assigned. Provides multiple ways to create or upload test cases.Test design is satisfactory when created using qTest .

Inconvénients :

Requirement mapping,for same items belonging to a particular story you still have to manually tag every item with the story.Frustrating. Also unit level management seems quite old and time consuming.