--- description: AssociationVoting : qu'en pensent les utilisateurs ? Lisez les avis clients sur AssociationVoting, consultez les prix, tarifs, abonnements et découvrez ses fonctionnalités. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: AssociationVoting - Avis, notes, prix et abonnements - Capterra France 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Accueil](/) > [Outils de vote en ligne](/directory/31217/voting/software) > [AssociationVoting](/software/172696/associationvoting) # AssociationVoting Canonical: https://www.capterra.fr/software/172696/associationvoting Page : 1/8\ Suivant: [Page suivante](https://www.capterra.fr/software/172696/associationvoting?page=2) > Solution de vote web pour les associations afin de gérer leurs nominations, élections en ligne, collecte de proxy et bulletins de vote papier. > > Conclusion : 179 utilisateurs lui ont donné la note de **4.7/5**. Figure au meilleur classement pour **Probabilité de recommander le produit**. ----- ## Présentation ### Qui utilise AssociationVoting ? Associations professionnelles, associations commerciales, syndicats de copropriétés, associations de propriétaires immobiliers, etc. ## Statistiques et notes | Métrique | Notation | En détail | | **Note globale** | **4.7/5** | 179 Avis | | Simplicité d’utilisation | 4.7/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Support client | 4.8/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Rapport qualité-prix | 4.7/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Fonctionnalités | 4.7/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Pourcentage de recommandation | 90% | (9/10 Probabilité de recommander le produit) | ## À propos de l'éditeur - **Société**: AssociationVoting - **Pays**: Howell, É.-U. - **Entreprise fondée en**: 2004 ## Contexte commercial - **Prix à partir de**: 99,00 $US - **Type de licence**: (Version gratuite disponible) (pendant l'essai gratuit) - **Public cible**: Auto-entrepreneur, 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1 000, 1 001–5 000, 5 001–10 000, 10 000+ - **Déploiement et plateformes**: Cloud, SaaS, web, Android (mobile), iPhone (mobile), iPad (mobile) - **Langues**: anglais - **Pays disponibles**: Canada, États-Unis ## Fonctionnalités - Authentification du votant - Bulletins de vote imprimés - Gestion des ballots - Gestion des commentaires - Gestion des enquêtes et sondages - Gestion des électeurs - Gestion des élections - Live Results Sharing - Nominations - Outils d'analyse de données - Profils des candidats - Questionnaires à choix multiples - Rapports et statistiques - Sondage en ligne - Sondages et votes - Stratégie de marque personnalisable - Suivi du taux de participation - Vote en ligne - Vote pondéré ## Ressources d'aide - Service client/e-mail - FAQ/forums - Base de connaissances - Support téléphonique - Chat ## Category - [Outils de vote en ligne](https://www.capterra.fr/directory/31217/voting/software) ## Catégories connexes - [Outils de vote en ligne](https://www.capterra.fr/directory/31217/voting/software) - [Logiciels de vote](https://www.capterra.fr/directory/31220/polling/software) ## Logiciels similaires 1. [ElectionBuddy](https://www.capterra.fr/software/1017815/electionbuddy) — 4.9/5 (116 reviews) 2. [NemoVote](https://www.capterra.fr/software/203575/nemovote) — 4.8/5 (72 reviews) 3. [Eligo](https://www.capterra.fr/software/1021608/eligo) — 4.7/5 (110 reviews) 4. [CondoVoter](https://www.capterra.fr/software/1029111/condovoter) — 4.8/5 (47 reviews) 5. [Vevox](https://www.capterra.fr/software/185114/vevox) — 4.8/5 (419 reviews) ## Avis ### "Excellent service client et mise en œuvre facile" — 5.0/5 > **Dave** | *27 octobre 2025* | Gestion de l'enseignement | Taux de recommandation : 10.0/10 > > **Avantages**: Un service client exceptionnel et des réponses rapides en cas de besoin. Une interface utilisateur très conviviale pour les membres souhaitant voter. J'apprécie particulièrement le rapport de vote qui permet de suivre l'engagement des membres d'une année sur l'autre. Les fonctionnalités intégrées sont très pratiques pour reproduire les élections précédentes et conserver les mêmes paramètres. > > **Inconvénients**: Peu d'inconvénients. Il y a une petite période d'adaptation, mais l'équipe d'AssociationVoting est tellement réactive qu'il est très facile de résoudre les problèmes. > > Très positif. Au fil des ans, différents responsables de mon organisation ont demandé à explorer d'autres options de vote, et en tant que membre du personnel qui administre et organise les élections, je suis toujours favorable à l'utilisation continue d'AssociationVoting \! ----- ### "Best Value and Quality Voting Softeware" — 5.0/5 > **Jim** | *20 janvier 2026* | Organisme social ou civique | Taux de recommandation : 10.0/10 > > **Avantages**: For the most part, the learning curve on the AssociationVoting software was relatively short. Customer Support was quick and accurate whenever we needed guidance. After evaluating 21 different eVoting software packages, AssociationVoting proved to be the best value for our money. The system allows for customization of the login procedure through a user-friendly table, which is one of the biggest advantages we found compared to the competition. This feature enabled us to guarantee one vote per household (per our bylaws), even though multiple email accounts exist within each household. > > **Inconvénients**: The terminology used for “campaigns” took a little time to understand at first, and I had to contact Customer Support to fully grasp how this feature worked. In this system, a campaign simply refers to scheduled voter reminder emails that are automatically sent at specific points during the voting window (for example, at the beginning, middle, and end of the voting period). If this feature were titled “Scheduled Voter Reminder Emails,” I believe it would have been more self-explanatory and easier to understand. > > Overall the AssociationVoting system was easy to set up and it has user-friendly interfaces that keeps track of the voting. ----- ### "Simple and Reliable Voting Platform" — 5.0/5 > **Utilisateur vérifié** | *30 juin 2026* | Services et technologies de l'information | Taux de recommandation : 9.0/10 > > **Avantages**: What I liked most was how easy it made the voting process. Setting up elections and collecting votes was straightforward, and members could participate without needing much guidance. The platform also helped keep everything organized and transparent. > > **Inconvénients**: The interface could feel a bit dated in some areas, and a few settings took some time to figure out. Adding more customization options and a more modern design would make the experience even better. > > Overall, I had a positive experience using AssociationVoting. It simplified election management, made voting convenient for members, and helped ensure the process was fair and organized. While there are a few areas that could be improved, it has been a reliable solution for our needs. ----- ### "Notes on AssociationVoting from a Staff User" — 3.0/5 > **Jingyao** | *28 juillet 2026* | Gestion d'organisme à but non lucratif | Taux de recommandation : 6.0/10 > > **Avantages**: For context, AssociationVoting is the only election management tool I've used, so I don't have much experience or insight with other platforms to have a strong opinion. I will say, as a staff member who inherited this platform from a past administrator with no instructions, it is a self-teachable tool. This year, we ended up in a strange situation where two elections were needed. The customer service line was great. The representative was super helpful and explained things clearly, walking me through what was needed to hold two elections. The process wasn't ideal, but the representative provided friendly and quality service. > > **Inconvénients**: I mentioned that the platform is self-teachable, but it's not intuitive. The guides are very wordy, and I think more visual prompts would be helpful. For example, there are so many prompts for personalized language, but it's not always clear where a user will see the prompt and how it would appear on their screen. It requires extra time to create test voter profiles just to see how things appear on the voter's end. > > Again, I don't have experience with other platforms, other than as a voter for another membership association I'm a member of. I think my experience as a staff member who helps manage the election has been a bit mixed. I don't think it's a difficult platform, but I can see how it might be challenging for others to manage, which is something I think about as we work toward transitioning election management to a volunteer member committee. I'm not opposed to keeping AssociationVoting as our platform for another year or so. ----- ### "Glowing Review" — 5.0/5 > **Carrie** | *29 mai 2026* | Organisme social ou civique | Taux de recommandation : 10.0/10 > > **Avantages**: Once support staff explained how the software works, it was easy and an enjoyable experience. User friendly\! > > **Inconvénients**: Sometimes you have to be honest. I have wracked my brain trying to find a con or something I didn't like. Sorry to disappoint, but there was nothing. > > From the very beginning to the end of our election, it was smooth sailing all the way. Support, timeliness and going that extra mile for us made an enormous difference. Our group was very satisfied\! Thank you\! ----- Page : 1/8\ Suivant: [Page suivante](https://www.capterra.fr/software/172696/associationvoting?page=2) ## Liens - [Afficher sur Capterra](https://www.capterra.fr/software/172696/associationvoting) ## Cette page est disponible dans les langues suivantes. | Langue | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | ----- ## Données structurées