Clinical Research IO

par Clinical Research IO

Qui utilise Clinical Research IO ?

Sites de recherche et sponsors. Pour les sites, un outil d'entreprise pour rationaliser les opérations et améliorer la productivité. Pour les sponsors, une plateforme de données pour une surveillance centralisée.

Description de Clinical Research IO

Une solution intuitive d'eSource, de routage de laboratoire et de CTMS pour les sites de recherche. Grâce à CRIO, les sites peuvent enregistrer leurs procédures favorites, créer leurs propres modèles de sources, saisir les données sources rapidement et avec précision, annoter les laboratoires et partager les visites avec leurs moniteurs pour vérification. Le recrutement aide à gérer les patients et les campagnes et permet d'appeler et d'envoyer des SMS en un seul clic. Le service des finances calcule les créances et les facturables au fur et à mesure que les visites sont effectuées. Il s'agit d'un service de qualité supérieure à un prix abordable.

Informations sur Clinical Research IO

Clinical Research IO

https://www.clinicalresearch.io/

Fondé en 2015

Prix de Clinical Research IO

Clinical Research IO n'est pas disponible en version gratuite et ne propose pas d'essai gratuit.

-thumb
-thumb
-thumb
-thumb

Version gratuite

Non

Essai gratuit

Non

Déploiement

Cloud, SaaS, web

Formation

Formation présentielle

Formation en ligne en direct

Documentation

Ressources d'aide

Support en horaire de bureau

En ligne

Clinical Research IO - Fonctionnalités

  • Conception des essais
  • Conforme HIPAA
  • Conformité 21 CFR Part 11
  • Dossier médical informatisé et partagé
  • Double saisie de données
  • Gestion des documents
  • Gestion des flux de travail
  • Gestion des patients
  • Gestion des stocks
  • Gestion financière
  • Importation et exportation de données
  • Planification
  • Randomisation
  • Recrutement de patients
  • Saisie électronique des données
  • Suivi des patients

Logiciels de gestion d'essais cliniques : afficher la liste complète

Clinical Research IO - Alternatives

Plus d'alternatives à Clinical Research IO

Avis sur Clinical Research IO

Lire tous les avis

Note globale

4,5/5

Note moyenne

Facilité d'utilisation 4,5
Service client 5
Fonctionnalités 4,3
Rapport qualité-prix 4,5

Évaluer le logiciel

Partagez vos expériences avec d'autres acheteurs de logiciels.

Écrivez votre avis !
La W.
Founder
Temps d'utilisation du produit: 6 à 12 mois
  • Note globale
    5 /5
  • Facilité d'utilisation
    5 /5
  • Fonctionnalités
    5 /5
  • Support client
    5 /5
  • Rapport qualité-prix
    5 /5
  • Probabilité de recommander le produit
    10/10
  • Source de l'avis 
  • Publié le 02/11/2017

"Super efficient, friendly support, proactive company focused on site needs & industry demands."

Commentaires: The time spent in clinic and entering data has been cut to less than half. We are continuing to learn about all of the functions of this software and have not been dissappointed in anything yet. The capabilities are endless and the cost is affordable. Big pharma should jump at the chance at having real time data available. This has been a game changer at our site. We only have 2 coordinators so we were limited in our study load. We have doubled our study load within 6 months of starting with CRIO. You will not find a single system that offers all that CRIO does and for the price too!

Avantages: This is the creme de la creme of clinical research software. There are so many modules and training that it will take some time to get used to but you will never be sorry. If you seriously commit to learning and using this system you will save so much time from capturing data real time to decreasing errors and deviations. I absolutely love the reponse time from the CRIO team and the "live chat" feature has saved our site from having any major meltdowns due to the learning curve. Our site is almost completely paperless thanks to this amazing software.
Comments from CRA's : "this is the wave of the future"
"your site is so far ahead in the game, why aren't all sites using this?"
" what is it called again?"
The game changer for our site was the financial tracker module. We are a small site so using Fresh Books, an EMR, a CTMS, and entering data in respective EDC's took an incredible amount of time... time wasted entering data trifold and trying to track what we are owed vs paid & costs to our vendors , study staff etc.
Major bonus points for this system that our site was not looking for was the recruiting module. This system is truly a one stop shop. Better is efficiency in what we do, how we do it, without compromising the integrity of the data. Data entry errors across multiple systems compromises data, creates queries and wastes time. CRIO does interface with other data systems making data entry at the site occur one time. Imagine that!

  • Source de l'avis 
  • Publié le 02/11/2017
Chelsey M.
Quality Control Director/Research Team Manager
Recherche, 11-50 employés
Temps d'utilisation du produit: plus d'un an
  • Note globale
    5 /5
  • Facilité d'utilisation
    5 /5
  • Fonctionnalités
    5 /5
  • Support client
    5 /5
  • Rapport qualité-prix
    5 /5
  • Probabilité de recommander le produit
    10/10
  • Source de l'avis 
  • Publié le 12/04/2018

"Life Changing!"

Commentaires: This software significantly helps with patient management. All in one system that is easy to use.

Avantages: User-friendly! I love that this program makes following protocol requirements for study visits a breeze! It is extremely easy to make adjustments (for example if there are protocol amendments) and the software takes away the stress of forgetting things like re-consenting patients or follow-up evaluations of AEs. Groundbreaking for the research industry!

Inconvénients: In regards to the cons, I have little/nothing to note. Customer service has been very responsive and easy to talk to; they have resolved most of my issues immediately.

  • Source de l'avis 
  • Publié le 12/04/2018
Utilisateur vérifié
Business Development
Produits pharmaceutiques, 11-50 employés
Temps d'utilisation du produit: 6 à 12 mois
  • Note globale
    1 /5
  • Facilité d'utilisation
    1 /5
  • Fonctionnalités
    1 /5
  • Support client
    5 /5
  • Rapport qualité-prix
    1 /5
  • Probabilité de recommander le produit
    0/10
  • Source de l'avis 
  • Publié le 24/09/2020

"A Fundamentally Broken product that will frustrate you to no end! DO NOT BUY THIS"

Commentaires: Absolutely the worst product I have ever used. Even typing in a diagnosis becomes an issue. Everything is so much more complicated than it needs to be. This is a waste of money and this company should not even be in business.

Avantages: Nothing - this product is not worth anything because it will never truly work. You will never stop experiencing problems.

Inconvénients: This product is absolutely FULL of broken functionalities and errors. There isn't a day go by where a basic function stops working and I need to contact their customer support. They never fix these issues permanently and leave most of the implementation work for you to do. They nickel and dime and ultimately their software designers choose the most idiotic choices that leave the software unnecessarily complicated to use. DO NOT BUY THIS SOFTWARE. If you do, you will experience what I have and you will remember this review!

  • Source de l'avis 
  • Publié le 24/09/2020
Ryan L.
Clinical Research Manager
Temps d'utilisation du produit: 6 à 12 mois
  • Note globale
    4 /5
  • Facilité d'utilisation
    5 /5
  • Fonctionnalités
    4 /5
  • Support client
    5 /5
  • Rapport qualité-prix
    5 /5
  • Probabilité de recommander le produit
    8/10
  • Source de l'avis 
  • Publié le 13/11/2017

"Excellent clinical research software with great value for the cost."

Avantages: -UI is very clean and easily navigated.
-Source creation that is simple for anyone with some advanced features.
-Frequent updates and improvements.
-Payment model that makes sense for research sites.
-External logins allow monitors to leave comments directly on the eSource form!

Inconvénients: -Simplistic source creation doesn't lend itself to specific needs. As an ophthalmology practice, best-corrected visual acuity is impossible to adequately and efficiently capture on this platform. That said, I haven't seen a system that can do much better.
-They took an interesting approach of starting with a complicated form and simplifying it as you answer questions rather than vice versa. I don't dislike it but would prefer the alternative for the purposes of clinical research.

  • Source de l'avis 
  • Publié le 13/11/2017
David S.
President & CEO
Temps d'utilisation du produit: plus d'un an
  • Note globale
    5 /5
  • Facilité d'utilisation
    5 /5
  • Fonctionnalités
    5 /5
  • Support client
    5 /5
  • Rapport qualité-prix
    5 /5
  • Probabilité de recommander le produit
    Sans note
  • Source de l'avis 
  • Publié le 11/01/2018

"One of the best User experiences in Research and Software I have experienced."

Avantages: It is both online (website) and available in an App. Since October 2016, we have experienced zero downtime. Even better: the have an integrated Chat feature...which they answer, respond to, and fix any/all issues, and answer all questions.

Inconvénients: When we started with CRIO, they did not have an integrated database we could use for recruiting. They do now. When we started, they did not have a financial component we could use to track work done. They do now. The only outstanding issues are: no regulatory component and no ability to consent patients with CRIO.

  • Source de l'avis 
  • Publié le 11/01/2018