--- description: BrowserStack : qu'en pensent les utilisateurs ? Lisez les avis clients sur BrowserStack, consultez les prix, tarifs, abonnements et découvrez ses fonctionnalités. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: BrowserStack - Avis, notes, prix et abonnements - Capterra France 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Accueil](/) > [Logiciels de test automatisé](/directory/30609/automated-testing/software) > [BrowserStack](/software/162900/browserstack) # BrowserStack Canonical: https://www.capterra.fr/software/162900/browserstack Page : 1/32\ Suivant: [Page suivante](https://www.capterra.fr/software/162900/browserstack?page=2) > Plateforme de test multinavigateur conçue pour aider les développeurs à tester des applications mobiles et des sites web. > > Conclusion : 775 utilisateurs lui ont donné la note de **4.6/5**. Figure au meilleur classement pour **Probabilité de recommander le produit**. ----- ## Présentation ### Qui utilise BrowserStack ? En bref : toute personne qui conçoit et/ou développe pour le web ouvert. Ces outils de test interactifs multinavigateurs ne requièrent aucune compétence en codage. ## Statistiques et notes | Métrique | Notation | En détail | | **Note globale** | **4.6/5** | 775 Avis | | Simplicité d’utilisation | 4.6/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Support client | 4.4/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Rapport qualité-prix | 4.2/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Fonctionnalités | 4.5/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Pourcentage de recommandation | 90% | (9/10 Probabilité de recommander le produit) | ## À propos de l'éditeur - **Société**: BrowserStack - **Entreprise fondée en**: 2011 ## Contexte commercial - **Prix à partir de**: 39,00 $US - **Type de licence**: (Version gratuite disponible) (pendant l'essai gratuit) - **Public cible**: Auto-entrepreneur, 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1 000, 1 001–5 000, 5 001–10 000, 10 000+ - **Déploiement et plateformes**: Cloud, SaaS, web, Mac (ordinateur), Windows (ordinateur) - **Langues**: anglais - **Pays disponibles**: Afrique du Sud, Allemagne, Australie, Brésil, Canada, Danemark, Inde, Irlande, Israël, Mexique, Royaume-Uni, Singapour, Émirats arabes unis, États-Unis, Îles Vierges britanniques, Îles Vierges des États-Unis ## Fonctionnalités - Alertes/Notifications - Annotations - Archivage et rétention - Assurance qualité - Automated Testing - Ciblage du public - Contrôles/Permissions d'accès - Détection d'anomalies - Enquêtes et feedback - Enregistrement et transcription vidéo - Gestion de projets - Gestion de versions - Gestion des audits - Gestion des documents - Gestion des exigences - Gestion des flux de travail - Gestion des incidents - Gestion des performances - Gestion des risques - Gestion des référentiels - Gestion des tests - Gestion des tests de logiciels - Identification des goulots d'étranglement - Indicateurs quantitatifs - Intégration continue - Mesure des performances - Monitoring - Monitoring réseau - Multiple Test Types - Outils de collaboration - Piste d'audit - Prise en charge de l'exécution parallèle - Rapports et analyses - Scripts de test - Scénarios de test de charge - Suivi de la conformité - Suivi des activités - Suivi des problèmes - Suivi des problèmes - Test de charge - Test des performances - Test mobile - Test web - Traçabilité - Visualisation de données - Vue hiérarchique - Vérification des scripts de test ## Intégrations (16 au total) - Appium - Bitbucket - CircleCI - Cypress - Espresso - GitHub - Jenkins - Jira - Microsoft Visual Studio - Netlify - Slack - Travis CI - Trello - Tricentis qTest - WordPress ... et 1 intégrations supplémentaires ## Ressources d'aide - Service client/e-mail - FAQ/forums - Base de connaissances - Support téléphonique - Chat ## Category - [Logiciels de test automatisé](https://www.capterra.fr/directory/30609/automated-testing/software) ## Catégories connexes - [Logiciels de test automatisé](https://www.capterra.fr/directory/30609/automated-testing/software) - [Logiciels de bug tracking](https://www.capterra.fr/directory/30090/bug-tracking/software) - [Logiciels de test utilisateur](https://www.capterra.fr/directory/32295/user-testing/software) - [Logiciels de test de charge](https://www.capterra.fr/directory/32135/load-testing/software) - [Logiciels de gestion des tests](https://www.capterra.fr/directory/34315/test-management-tools/software) ## Logiciels similaires 1. [Lyssna](https://www.capterra.fr/software/178766/usabilityhub) — 4.6/5 (87 reviews) 2. [TestRail](https://www.capterra.fr/software/128204/testrail) — 4.3/5 (179 reviews) 3. [QA Wolf](https://www.capterra.fr/software/1012378/qa-wolf) — 5.0/5 (73 reviews) 4. [kapptivate](https://www.capterra.fr/software/1069772/kapptivate) — 4.5/5 (6 reviews) 5. [Lightster](https://www.capterra.fr/software/1063000/lightster) — 4.7/5 (9 reviews) ## Avis ### "A solid platform for cross-browser and device testing" — 4.0/5 > **Enguerran** | *2 avril 2026* | Articles de sport | Taux de recommandation : 8.0/10 > > **Avantages**: The testing facility offers a wide range of actual devices and various internet browsers and different operating systems which I find to be highly valuable. The solution enables us to eliminate all requirements for maintaining our own device testing laboratory. Our quality assurance process becomes more efficient because the system provides automatic testing framework support for smooth integration. > > **Inconvénients**: The pricing plans can be a bit steep, especially for smaller teams or startups. I experience slight latency or lag when I manually interact with specific real mobile devices that are hosted on the cloud. > > The BrowserStack tool functions as a vital resource for my complete daily professional activities. The tool enables me to reproduce user bugs on particular environments which lets me test all application features for browser compatibility. The product succeeds as a time-saving solution which accomplishes all its declared benefits. ----- ### "Great diversity of devices but some lags" — 4.0/5 > **Léo** | *13 décembre 2025* | Services et technologies de l'information | Taux de recommandation : 8.0/10 > > **Avantages**: I really liked being able to test different websites on real devices in real time. As an agency, it's important to be able to see how the websites we design look on different devices and browser versions. > > **Inconvénients**: I experienced some graphical bugs and lag at times, which meant that the experience wasn't perfect 100% of the time. ----- ### "La meilleure solution du marché" — 5.0/5 > **Jacques** | *14 septembre 2024* | Services et technologies de l'information | Taux de recommandation : 10.0/10 > > **Avantages**: Cela fonctionne et c'est abordable, tandis que d'autres solutions peuvent être lentes ou présenter des bugs. De plus, le support est réactif et analyse efficacement les problèmes. > > **Inconvénients**: L'application affiche des publicités lors de l'ouverture d'un appareil pour des tests, même si nous avons un forfait payant... ----- ### "Fast and Efficient Browser Testing" — 5.0/5 > **Yash** | *9 juillet 2026* | Services et technologies de l'information | Taux de recommandation : 10.0/10 > > **Avantages**: BrowserStack is easy to use and offers excellent browser and device coverage for efficient cross-browser testing. It saves time by quickly identifying compatibility issues across different environments. > > **Inconvénients**: The pricing can be expensive for smaller teams, and remote sessions may occasionally experience slight lag. Some advanced features also take time for new users to learn. > > Overall, my experience with BrowserStack has been very good. It's a reliable and user-friendly platform that makes cross-browser testing fast and efficient. ----- ### "The Unfair Advantage Every QA/Automation Team Deserves" — 5.0/5 > **Yogesh** | *2 avril 2026* | Produits chimiques | Taux de recommandation : 10.0/10 > > **Avantages**: Five years on the enterprise plan and the one thing I like most is how BrowserStack completely removes infrastructure as a problem. Real devices with SIM support, thousands of browser and OS combinations, instant availability, no maintenance overhead. App Live and App Automate work seamlessly with Selenium, Appium, Playwright and most of automation tools without any complex setup. Parallel execution is significantly faster than any self hosted grid I have managed. The newly released no code low code testing is also best, accessibility testing and visual regression tools are production ready and not just checkboxes. For an enterprise team this is the best investment in the testing stack. > > **Inconvénients**: Pricing is the one honest gripe. BrowserStack is worth every rupee but it is not cheap, and for smaller teams or startups the enterprise plan can feel like a stretch. Parallel session limits on lower tiers push you to upgrade faster than expected and when your team scales quickly, the cost scales with it in a way that requires a conversation with finance every renewal cycle. > > BrowserStack did not just improve our testing workflow, It transformed how our entire engineering culture thinks about quality. The chaos before was real. Flaky emulators, inconsistent local device setups, test results that meant nothing because the environment was never stable. Onboarding a new automation tool meant weeks of configuration, compatibility debugging and infrastructure work before a single meaningful test ran. From day one on the BS plan the difference was visible. Real devices, real browsers, real network conditions, available instantly, every single time. No queues, no "device is offline," no environment drift. The confidence in our test results changed overnight because the platform underneath them was finally reliable. Across multiple automation tools integration experience has been consistently smooth. Switching frameworks mid project did not mean rebuilding infrastructure, It meant updating a config and moving on. That kind of flexibility is rare and genuinely underappreciated until you have worked without it. App Live became the go to for exploratory testing on real devices with SIM support. App Automate handled mobile regression at a scale and speed a physical device lab three times our budget could not have matched. The freedom to choose between virtual and real devices depending on the test objective gave us precision we simply did not have before. The no code and low code capabilities brought manual QA members directly into the automation process, accessibility testing and visual regression are now standard pipeline stages, not separate afterthought tools. Everything lives in one platform, reporting is unified and session management gives complete visibility into what ran, when and exactly why something failed. Enterprise support has been a genuine partner throughout, Issues resolved by people who actually understand automation deeply, not generic ticket handlers. There is a reason it remains the one tool in the stack that has never been up for replacement. It is not just a platform, it is the foundation our entire quality process is built on. ----- Page : 1/32\ Suivant: [Page suivante](https://www.capterra.fr/software/162900/browserstack?page=2) ## Liens - [Afficher sur Capterra](https://www.capterra.fr/software/162900/browserstack) ## Cette page est disponible dans les langues suivantes. | Langue | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pl | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | | sv | | ----- ## Données structurées