15 ans à aider les entreprises françaises
à choisir le meilleur logiciel

Description de Airbrake

Airbrake fournit un système complet de surveillance des applications, vous alertant en temps réel des erreurs qui affectent vos utilisateurs. De plus, Airbrake vous fournit les éléments contextuels et tous les diagnostics de causes premières dont vous avez besoin pour les résoudre rapidement. Airbrake c'est moins de stress pour vous et une meilleure expérience pour vos utilisateurs. Airbrake prend en charge toutes les principales plateformes et langues, s'intègre à vos outils de flux de travail existants et est approuvé par des milliers d'équipes techniques à travers le monde, y compris celles de Netflix, Salesforce, Oracle, eBay, Twitch et Soundcloud.

Qui utilise Airbrake ?

Airbrake est adapté aux équipes de développement de toutes tailles. Les licences pour entreprises incluent l'installation sur site et sont conformes à toutes les politiques et réglementations en matière de sécurité comme la loi HIPAA.

Airbrake Logiciel - 1
Airbrake Logiciel - 2
Airbrake Logiciel - 3
Airbrake Logiciel - 4
Airbrake Logiciel - 5

Airbrake ne vous convainc pas tout à fait ? Comparer avec une alternative populaire

Airbrake

Airbrake

4,7 (30)
19,00 $US
mois
Version gratuite
Version d'essai gratuite
12
15
4,7 (30)
4,6 (30)
4,7 (30)
VS.
À partir de
Types de licence
Fonctionnalités
Intégrations
Facilité d'utilisation
Rapport qualité-prix
Service client
Prix introuvable
Version gratuite
Version d'essai gratuite
61
2
4,2 (177)
4,0 (177)
4,2 (177)
Les jauges horizontales vertes représentent le logiciel le plus apprécié selon la note globale qui lui a été attribuée ainsi que le nombre d'avis.

Alternatives à Airbrake

New Relic
Fonctionnalités les mieux notées
Alertes/Notifications
Monitoring
Surveillance en temps réel
BugSnag
Fonctionnalités les mieux notées
Monitoring
Outils de diagnostic
Suivi des serveurs
Rollbar
Fonctionnalités les mieux notées
Contrôles/Permissions d'accès
Définition des priorités
Rapports et analyses
Jira
Fonctionnalités les mieux notées
Gestion des tâches
Méthodes Agiles
Planification et programmation de projets
Caspio
Fonctionnalités les mieux notées
Gestion des flux de travail
Migration de données
Planification et programmation de projets
WaveMaker
Fonctionnalités les mieux notées
Aucune fonctionnalité n'a été évaluée par les utilisateurs de ce logiciel.
Quixy
Fonctionnalités les mieux notées
Contrôles/Permissions d'accès
Création et conception de formulaires
Pour le développement sans code
Mendix
Fonctionnalités les mieux notées
Contrôles/Permissions d'accès
Débogage
Interface graphique
DevSuite
Fonctionnalités les mieux notées
Gestion des documents
Gestion des flux de travail
Gestion des tâches

Avis sur Airbrake

Note moyenne

Note globale
4,7
Facilité d'utilisation
4,7
Service client
4,7
Fonctionnalités
4,7
Rapport qualité-prix
4,6

Avis classés par taille de l'entreprise (nombre d'employés)

  • <50
  • 51-200
  • 201-1 000
  • >1 001

Trouver les avis classés par note

5
70%
4
30%
Bryan
Bryan
Product Director (É.-U.)
Utilisateur LinkedIn vérifié
Design
Temps d'utilisation du logiciel : plus de deux ans
Source de l'avis

My Favorite Error Tracker for Webapps

5,0 il y a 6 ans

Commentaires : Airbrake has made error tracking easy for us and I enjoy that the interface and feature set continue to improve over the years.

Avantages :

Airbrake is one of the items on our checklist to setup with every new webapp we create. The setup is fast and it provides immediate value. Being able to receive an email for a new error that comes in is indispensable.

Inconvénients :

I would like to see Airbrake integrate with Kanbanery as that is our agile project management tool of choice. It does already integrate with Trello and Pivotal Tracker. Finally, while we use Airbrake on all of our apps, we do not always upgrade to a paid plan as it is simply more than we need. If Airbrake had one more lower tier paid option, then we would consider upgrading more apps to paid plans.

Rich
Engineering Manager (É.-U.)
Internet, 1 001–5 000 employés
Temps d'utilisation du logiciel : plus de deux ans
Source de l'avis

Airbrake is a great error monitoring product

5,0 il y a 7 ans

Commentaires : We rely on Airbrake for additional production and test environment monitoring of app exceptions. By linking Airbrake error alerts to HipChat notifications, we get great high-level alerts whenever an error happens, right in our team chat room. It's easy to drill down into the error details with the UI. We also use the Comments feature of the Airbrake errors to reduce bystander effect among team members -- no comment means nobody triaged the issue.

Avantages :

Great UI, easy to drill into the errors. It's great how they roll up errors of similar types intelligently. The "Occurrences" view is especially helpful, to know which errors are infrequent and which deserve higher attention.

Matthew
Lead Data Engineer (É.-U.)
Services et technologies de l'information, 501–1 000 employés
Temps d'utilisation du logiciel : plus de deux ans
Source de l'avis

Alternatives envisagées précédemment :

A Long Running Service For Exception Reporting

4,0 il y a 4 ans

Commentaires : We used Airbrake for many years and found it easy to integrate it into projects with Ruby on Rails and other popular frameworks. Over time the company has shifted more towards using Rollbar which is compatible with Airbrake clients but had more advanced server side aggregation of errors and other search / filtering features that came in handy for us.

Avantages :

It is easy to setup with popular frameworks like Ruby on Rails and Python. Its compatible with similar products which helps avoid vendor lock-in. The service has been running a long time and has established a track record of being reliable.

Inconvénients :

It is a bit light on features compared to some of the newer competitors. The main decision points for me would be cost and how easily the UI allows you to access the information you need. I think there are competitors with a better UI and the pricing would probably depend on your team size.

Spencer
É.-U.
Temps d'utilisation du logiciel : Non fourni
Source de l'avis

Powerful and easy to use! Plus, a great ROI

5,0 il y a 7 ans

Commentaires : Airbrake has been used by other teams in my organizations for quite some time. My team and I were building a new Rails application and we decided to include Airbrake for error reporting. Using Airbrake was one of the best decisions we made and here's why:
tl;dr - Installation, configuration, and integration were all painless. My only request is to expand supported integrations to more and different systems (New Relic, in our case).
1) App integration: "Installing" Airbrake in our Rails application was as simple as adding an entry in our Gemfile and creating an initializer for configuration. And that's it! 2) Configurability: As I just mentioned, configuration is available in your application. However, configuration "points" also exist in Airbrake at the account, project, and user levels. All these configurations work together seamlessly. This has allowed us to get the right notifications to the right people at the right time and avoid the "notification overload" that can come with other monitoring solutions. 3) External Integrations: Airbrake supports integration with many popular issue trackers and team communication solutions. We integrate Airbrake with JIRA and Slack, so there was no need to introduce a new tool to our daily workflow. However, I would like to see integration support expanded. For example, the integration with New Relic requires a third party solution that ended up not working for us. Airbrake does support webhooks, so we're still able to integrate with systems that are not supported OoTB. 4) Documentation: Setting up Airbrake and integrating it into our ecosystem has required little to no guesswork on our part.

David Eugene
David Eugene
Senior Quality Analyst (Philippines)
Utilisateur LinkedIn vérifié
Externalisation/délocalisation, 51–200 employés
Temps d'utilisation du logiciel : 1 à 5 mois
Source de l'avis

Trace logs galore

4,0 il y a 5 ans

Commentaires : since we don't have the luxury of time to debug and traceback every issue happening to our multiple sites, airbrake cuts so much time debugging and that time saved is better spent on working on a fix right away, sometimes even before the users notice anything.

Avantages :

Our Devs love to sift through the detailed logs, if they put the airbrake code in their source properly. For me as QA, i can also traceback what scenario triggers a particular error log. if we don't have enough time to go inside airbrake, we can have email/slack alerts set up for specific issues, from specified environments. mute an expected alert is also possible, if needed. The dashboard is available with graphs and statistical data.

Inconvénients :

probably too much information at times, like for a simple error message on the UI, there maybe hundreds of lines of backtrace info being sent. maybe not a very bad thing to have, but when the issues come in all at once, it's overwhelming that the users don't want to be inside the airbrake site anymore and just wait for user feedback, then check airbrake as last resort.