17 ans à aider les entreprises françaises
à choisir le meilleur logiciel
Marker
Description de Marker
Marker.io permet aux testeurs et aux personnes prenant part au processus de développement/gestion produit d'envoyer des commentaires accompagnés de supports visuels directement aux développeurs. Enregistrez, commentez et signalez des bogues que les développeurs sauront reproduire facilement. Ne perdez pas de temps à former votre équipe sur de nouveaux outils et flux de travail. Bénéficiez d'intégrations étroites avec les outils de suivi des incidents que votre équipe utilise : Jira, Trello, GitHub, Asana, Gitlab, etc.
Qui utilise Marker ?
Les équipes de développement de logiciels utilisent Marker.io pour enregistrer, signaler et suivre des bogues et incidents dans Jira, Trello, GitHub, Gitlab, Asana, etc.
Marker ne vous convainc pas tout à fait ?
Comparer avec une alternative populaire
Marker
Alternatives à Marker
Avis sur Marker
Easy way to share visual issues
Commentaires : This is the kind of software that saves you time allowing you to focus on what really matter.
Avantages :
As a developer, I love that all issues reported into Jira actually come with the source URL and information about the user environment (Browser, OS, screen size, ...)
Inconvénients :
I really hope that the team at Marker.io will build the ability to edit the built-in bug reporting template
Réponse de l'équipe de Marker.io
il y a 7 ans
We now support a custom bug report template help your colleagues & clients report bugs that fit your developers' needs. Just go to your dashboard and you'll see this a new tab allowing you to edit your bug report template.
Does a few, specific things *extremely* well.
Avantages :
Marker saves our team tons of time by allowing our clients to report bugs and issues on the software we developer quickly and efficiently. Clients feel empowered to be able to send feedback with zero friction or issues. The resulting tickets go directly into Jira so we can prioritize alongside all of our other work. Marker is perfect for what it sets out to do.Also - their support is fantastic. The [sensitive content hidden] is responsive and takes care to act on feedback and feature requests super quickly.
Inconvénients :
N/A - it is perfect for what it aims to do.
Alternatives envisagées précédemment :
Marker is great for some things but not others
Commentaires : Very nice interface and integrations. May be a bit too expensive for a single web designer/developer. Would like to see on-page integration.
Avantages :
I tried Marker for QA and issue tracking on websites. It works great to create tickets and integrates nicely with Trello (and many other Kanban-style software). There is a nice integration for allowing users to post their feedback either as a guest or a registered user.
Inconvénients :
Marker does not have real-time live issue tracking for website projects. This was crucial for me so that there were no duplicate tickets on a single page. There are probably workarounds but I wanted something that would allow me to navigate to a webpage and see the tickets associated with it directly on the page.
Bug reporting has never been easier since I've been using Marker !!
Avantages :
Before Marker, it was very difficult to explain a bug to my development team. I had to take print screens, then send by email, explain in the email the bug, etc. Thanks to Marker, it became very easy! all done in <10 seconds!
Inconvénients :
It would really be nice if the team could add video recording as a new feature to capture more dynamic bugs
Premium capture and annotate tool built for Agencies
Avantages :
Marker.io makes it easy for our clients, project managers, QA and designers to report bugs and issues to our development team via Trello and other support services we employ.
Inconvénients :
If Marker.io could grab the content of the console log, that would be awesome. Also, really looking forward to having access the Browserstack integration!
