15 ans à aider les entreprises françaises
à choisir le meilleur logiciel

BlackBerry CylancePROTECT

BlackBerry CylancePROTECT

Description de BlackBerry CylancePROTECT

Ne détectez plus seulement les attaques, évitez-les à l'aide de CylancePROTECT, la solution pour points de terminaison qui bloque 99 % des menaces en temps réel.

Qui utilise BlackBerry CylancePROTECT ?

Non fourni par l'éditeur

BlackBerry CylancePROTECT ne vous convainc pas tout à fait ? Comparer avec une alternative populaire

BlackBerry CylancePROTECT

BlackBerry CylancePROTECT

4,6 (64)
Indisponible dans votre pays
5,99 $US
mois
Version gratuite
Version d'essai gratuite
23
Intégrations introuvables
4,5 (64)
4,5 (64)
4,4 (64)
VS.
À partir de
Types de licence
Fonctionnalités
Intégrations
Facilité d'utilisation
Rapport qualité-prix
Service client
Prix introuvable
Version gratuite
Version d'essai gratuite
6
Intégrations introuvables
4,2 (74)
4,0 (74)
4,0 (74)

Alternatives à BlackBerry CylancePROTECT

Trend Micro Smart Protection Complete Suite
Fonctionnalités les mieux notées
Détection de spam
Intervention en cas de menace
autorisations/blocages
SentinelOne
Fonctionnalités les mieux notées
Gestion des incidents
Monitoring
Surveillance en temps réel
Trend Micro Deep Security
Fonctionnalités les mieux notées
Aucune fonctionnalité n'a été évaluée par les utilisateurs de ce logiciel.
DNSFilter
Fonctionnalités les mieux notées
Intervention en cas de menace
Rapports et analyses
Suivi des activités
Avast Premium Business Security
Fonctionnalités les mieux notées
Intervention en cas de menace
Protection des pièces jointes
Rapports et analyses
Trellix Endpoint Security
Fonctionnalités les mieux notées
Gestion des appareils
Surveillance en temps réel
Sécurité des applications
Falcon
Fonctionnalités les mieux notées
Analyse de la vulnérabilité
Détection d'anomalies et malware
Surveillance en temps réel
Symantec Endpoint Security
Fonctionnalités les mieux notées
Antivirus
Audit de sécurité
Gestion des incidents
Bitdefender GravityZone
Fonctionnalités les mieux notées
Intervention en cas de menace
Sécurité des données
Sécurité réseau

Avis sur BlackBerry CylancePROTECT

Note moyenne

Note globale
4,6
Facilité d'utilisation
4,5
Service client
4,4
Fonctionnalités
4,5
Rapport qualité-prix
4,5

Avis classés par taille de l'entreprise (nombre d'employés)

  • <50
  • 51-200
  • 201-1 000
  • >1 001

Trouver les avis classés par note

5
73%
4
16%
3
9%
1
2%
Brian
Brian
IT Manager (É.-U.)
Utilisateur LinkedIn vérifié
Construction, 201–500 employés
Temps d'utilisation du logiciel : plus de deux ans
Source de l'avis

Ignore the marketing hype, for endpoint protection this is the real deal

5,0 il y a 4 ans

Commentaires : I have a significant number of users out in the field with limited or no edge protection, so a cloud based endpoint solution is an obvious first step. With a traditional AV client that includes web filtering, which we also have, I would consider those endpoints EXTREMELY vulnerable. Even with excellent email filtering, which we also have, there are just too many things that can go horribly wrong. With three years experience and NO compromised endpoints, I can focus on other security layers instead of faffing around fixing endpoints.

Avantages :

In the three years we've been protecting our endpoints with CylancePROTECT, we have had ZERO incidents across ~250 endpoints. I have tested the Cylance client against true zero day attacks, not recognized on VirusTotal, shared with me by an MSP friend. He has had many clients compromised by ransomware, several more than once, with nuke/pave/restore for the entire organization being the typical response. When I throw attacks against old-build agents, and those attacks are obliterated, it helps me sleep better at night. I don't see these attacks in my environment, hence the testing. The endpoint is the focus of the last line of defense, so PROTECT is critical in my security posture.

Inconvénients :

In comparison to traditional signature-based (useless) AV, CylancePROTECT and CylanceOPTICS seems expensive. That's why my MSP pal doesn't have his SMB clients on this product, they can't comprehend the value proposition of something so different to what they're familiar with. I guess that's why the marketing initiatives can seem a little over the top, it's hard to get the idea across when some hater says "doesn't detect EICAR!"

Simha
Senior Information Security Specialist (Canada)
Services financiers, 5 001–10 000 employés
Temps d'utilisation du logiciel : plus d'un an
Source de l'avis

Alternatives envisagées :

Script Blocking and Machine Learning is CylancePROTECT's Strength

4,0 l’année dernière

Commentaires : Very pleased.

Avantages :

Easy to deploy and manage policies across 1000s of assets in the corporate network. Has coverage for various OS platforms, including Windows, Linux, and macOS. Can perform bulk quarantine across all hosts for a known threat. Whitelist or exclusion is easy to setup. A user friendly console for reporting and oversight dashboard for threat trends and malware families.

Inconvénients :

Some times results in false positive for the script module and could get tricky to manage exceptions if one is not fully aware of the gaps they can introduce by simply whitelisting system paths where most malware run. Could include real-time sandbox capabilities like other competing products in the market

Brendan
Technology Manager (É.-U.)
Gestion d'organisme à but non lucratif, 201–500 employés
Temps d'utilisation du logiciel : plus d'un an
Source de l'avis

Alternatives envisagées :

CylanceProtect was great. Blackberry Protect? Not so much.

3,0 il y a 3 ans

Avantages :

CylanceProtect was by all accounts, the best endpoint protection on the market. It provided outstanding protection for all our Windows and Mac endpoints.

Inconvénients :

Since Blackberry bought them in 2019, the "merging" of the two companies has been clumsy. The Cylance website dashboard was clean and somewhat easy to use. The Blackberry website looks like it was designed by someone who still uses a Blackberry mobile phone. Mac OS Big Sur is being released this week, and the endpoint client for it (that really should have been released with Catalina) is still not available. False positives for Adobe CS updates seem endless. I'll be looking at alternative options when our licensing expires next summer.

Tonia
IT Administrator (É.-U.)
Gestion d'organisme à but non lucratif, 51–200 employés
Temps d'utilisation du logiciel : 1 à 5 mois
Source de l'avis

Alternatives envisagées :

Cylance Review

5,0 il y a 3 mois

Commentaires : Blackberry Cylance Protect is very light weight and does not impact the PC's performance. It uses AI and seems to do a great job. It would be nice if they also had a feature for the Firewall settings.

Avantages :

Blackberry Cylance Protect is very light weight and very powerful.

Inconvénients :

does not offer any enhanced firewall settings

Chris
IT Services Manager (É.-U.)
Services et technologies de l'information, 11–50 employés
Temps d'utilisation du logiciel : plus de deux ans
Source de l'avis

Alternatives envisagées :

This product will save your backside!

5,0 il y a 2 ans

Commentaires : Extremely positive. We recommend using a MSSP to help manage the product (EDR service) for best protection.

Avantages :

Very easy to deploy the application to endpoints, cloud management is easy to use and mange deployment. The product is very configurable to customize to your needs. Malware detection and removal is outstanding.

Inconvénients :

Trying to configure the policies on your own can be a challenge, be sure to acquire the product from a MSSP to ensure you set it up right and have ongoing support.