SimScale

par SimScale

4.5 / 5 56 avis
SimScale

Logiciels les + demandés


Pour qui ?

SimScale fait partie intégrante du processus de validation de la conception de milliers d'entreprises prospères à travers le monde dans des secteurs tels que l'AIC, le HVAC et l'électronique.

Notes moyennes

56 avis
  • Note globale 4.5 / 5
  • Facilité d'utilisation 4 / 5
  • Service client 4.5 / 5
  • Fonctionnalités 4 / 5
  • Rapport qualité-prix 4.5 / 5

Informations sur le produit

  • Version gratuite Oui
  • Version d'essai gratuite Oui
  • Déploiement Cloud, SaaS, web
  • Formation Formation en ligne en direct
    Webinaires
    Documentation
  • Ressources d'aide Support en horaire de bureau
    En ligne

Informations sur l'éditeur

  • SimScale
  • https://simscale.com/_en/?
  • Fondé en 2012

En savoir plus sur SimScale

SimScale fait partie intégrante du processus de validation de la conception de milliers d'entreprises prospères dans le monde et de plus de 100 000 utilisateurs individuels. Il est principalement utilisé par les concepteurs de produits et les ingénieurs travaillant sur l'AIC (Architecture, Ingénierie et Construction), CVC (Chauffage, Ventilation et Climatisation), Électronique grand public et les marchés de l'emballage et des conteneurs, qui utilisent SimScale pour tester et optimiser leurs conceptions dans les premières étapes de développement.

SimScale - Fonctionnalités

  • Accès mobile
  • Collaboration
  • Dessin 2D
  • Fonctions pour gestion des installations
  • Gestion des changements
  • Gestion des documents
  • Modélisation 3D
  • Modélisation de la conception
  • Planification
  • Suivi des conflits
  • Analyse de conception
  • Base de données spécifique pour l'industrie
  • Manipulation directe
  • Modélisation 3D
  • Modélisation d'événements discrets
  • Modélisation de la turbulence
  • Modélisation des mouvements
  • Modélisation dynamique
  • Modélisation en continu
  • Modélisation graphique
  • Modélisation orientée agent
  • Modélisation stochastique
  • Outils de présentation
  • Simulation de Monte-Carlo

Avis les plus utiles sur SimScale

Excellent platform

Traduire avec Google Translate Publié le 06/10/2016
Ajay bangalore H.
Scientific Co-Worker
Recherche, 5 001-10 000 employés
Temps d'utilisation du produit: plus d'un an
Provenance de l'utilisateur 
5/5
Note globale
5 / 5
Facilité d'utilisation
4 / 5
Fonctionnalités
5 / 5
Support client
5 / 5
Rapport qualité-prix
Probabilité de recommander le produit :
Très faible Très élevée

Commentaires: I have tried several simulations - ranging from solid, fluid, particles etc. The platform is extremely well built and robust. I liked that it was extremely easy to use. The aspect I liked the most was that there is a community version that students and learners could use. In addition, I think the professional version serves best for more advanced users who would use simulations for design in a more pronounced manner and on an everyday basis. The forums are extremely helpful and I am really glad regarding the speed at which one receives replies both from the people working in the company and also other users. In addition, the blogs and help files definitely make it really easy to use the platform. One of the aspects I also liked is the fact that it is based on open-source codes. So it is not a black box. I could go to openFOAM and check out how things work. The codes are all well parallelized that I have never faced any issues. Issues with parallelization are a general problem in this line of work but with SimScale this was really handy. There are definitely some aspects where they can improve:
1. Providing structural elements like shells, beams, and plates. Most of the large aspect ratio structures are very time consuming to model using 3D FEM
2. Allow users to use custom material models. Most often, in both industry and academia, we do not use material models given in the software but would like to input our own material model. This is what drives most of the R&D centres. 3. There are no ad-hoc algorithms that allow hexahedral mesh generation for all geometries. I can think this as one of the reasons why SimScale might not have hexahedral mesh generator. But this can be significantly useful for many applications. I am sure this is a platform with great potential for the future & I will look forward to upcoming features.

Avantages: I have tried several simulations - ranging from solid, fluid, particles etc. The platform is extremely well built and robust. I liked that it was extremely easy to use. The aspect I liked the most was that there is a community version that students and learners could use. In addition, I think the professional version serves best for more advanced users who would use simulations for design in a more pronounced manner and on an everyday basis. The forums are extremely helpful and I am really glad regarding the speed at which one receives replies both from the people working in the company and also other users. In addition, the blogs and help files definitely make it really easy to use the platform. One of the aspects I also liked is the fact that it is based on open-source codes. So it is not a black box. I could go to openFOAM and check out how things work. The codes are all well parallelized that I have never faced any issues. Issues with parallelization are a general problem in this line of work but with SimScale this was really handy.

Inconvénients: There are definitely some aspects where they can improve:
1. Providing structural elements like shells, beams, and plates. Most of the large aspect ratio structures are very time consuming to model using 3D FEM
2. Allow users to use custom material models. Most often, in both industry and academia, we do not use material models given in the software but would like to input our own material model. This is what drives most of the R&D centres. 3. There are no ad-hoc algorithms that allow hexahedral mesh generation for all geometries. I can think this as one of the reasons why SimScale might not have hexahedral mesh generator. But this can be significantly useful for many applications.

Engineering simulation in the cloud

Traduire avec Google Translate Publié le 07/05/2019
Guillermo G.
Engineer
Génie mécanique ou industriel, Auto-entrepreneur
Temps d'utilisation du produit: plus de deux ans
Provenance de l'utilisateur 
5/5
Note globale
5 / 5
Facilité d'utilisation
3 / 5
Fonctionnalités
5 / 5
Support client
5 / 5
Rapport qualité-prix
Probabilité de recommander le produit :
Très faible Très élevée

Commentaires: I have been using SimScale to tackle professional consulting projects, in the fields of structural analysis and flow simulation. It has allowed me to run detailed models to my like, and even run many simulations at the same time. All computation process and data is hosted in the cloud, so I can rest assured, turn off my computer and leave it running overnight. When needed help or advice, the forum is a great place with experienced, willing to help people.

Avantages: The ability to run big models, such as FEA meshes in the order of 10 million nodes, and CFD in the order of 20 million cells, without the need of building a supercomputer is a game breaker. Just log in from a web browser and you are good to go to create, setup, run, supervise and post process any simulation. The support, both from the company and in the forum by other users is superb. Also, easy to access online tutorials, documentation, webinars and example projects lower the entre barrier for professionals that are new in the field.

Inconvénients: Still missing some functionality to be considered a complete suite, basically some FEA and CFD simulation models.

Lire d'autres avis