Pour qui ?

Les centres d'appels des PME, des grandes entreprises et des organismes publics utilisent NICE inContact CXone pour offrir des expériences client haut de gamme sur tous les canaux numériques et vocaux.

Notes moyennes

213 avis
  • Note globale 4 / 5
  • Facilité d'utilisation 4.1 / 5
  • Service client 3.8 / 5
  • Fonctionnalités 4 / 5
  • Rapport qualité-prix 3.8 / 5

Informations sur le produit

  • Version gratuite Non
  • Essai gratuit Non
  • Déploiement Cloud, SaaS, web
  • Formation Formation présentielle
    Formation en ligne en direct
    Webinaires
    Documentation
  • Ressources d'aide Service de support permanent (réponse directe)
    Support en horaire de bureau
    En ligne

Informations sur l'éditeur

  • NICE inContact
  • https://www.niceincontact.com
  • Fondé en 1997

En savoir plus sur NICE inContact CXone

NICE inContact est une des meilleures plateformes de gestion de l'expérience client sur le cloud. Grâce au routage omnicanal, à l'analytique, à l'optimisation des effectifs, à l'automatisation et à l'IA (intelligence artificielle), CXone permet aux organisations de toutes tailles de fournir des expériences client haut de gamme sur plusieurs canaux.

NICE inContact CXone - Fonctionnalités

  • Archivage
  • Bookmarking des enregistrements
  • Enregistrement d'appel vidéo
  • Enregistrement des activités de l'écran
  • Enregistrement des appels distribués
  • Enregistrement découlant d'un événement
  • Enregistrement planifié
  • Enregistrement à la demande
  • Partage des appels
  • Récupération instantanée
  • Transfert de fichiers
  • Centre d'appel
  • Enregistrement des appels
  • Gestion des enquêtes
  • Journalisation des appels
  • Messagerie vocale
  • Personnalisation de la voix
  • Prise en charge de plusieurs scripts
  • Routage des appels
  • Saisie téléphonique
  • Synthèse vocale
  • Budgétisation et prévision
  • Gestion des recrutements
  • Gestion des sous-traitants
  • Gestion du cycle de vie des employés
  • Main-d'œuvre variable
  • Planification
  • Pointage
  • Projection du travail
  • Suivi des compétences
  • Évaluation des performances
  • Enquêtes
  • Enregistrement des appels
  • Gestion des centres d'appel
  • Gestion des leads
  • Mode d'aperçu (preview dialer)
  • Mode progressif (progressive dialer)
  • Numéroteur automatique
  • Numéroteur prédictif (predictive dialer)
  • Rapports sur les appels
  • Scripts d'appel
  • Conformité FCC
  • Conformité FTC
  • Enregistrement des appels
  • Gestion des contacts
  • Gestion des leads
  • ID d'appelant spécifique à une campagne
  • Planification des rappels
  • Résultats d'appel
  • Saisie de leads
  • Suivi des appels
  • Transfert d’appel
  • Alertes et remontée des problèmes
  • Assistant virtuel
  • Base de connaissances
  • Enquêtes et feedback
  • Gestion des centres d'appel
  • Gestion des e-mails
  • Gestion des flux de travail
  • Gestion des listes d'attente
  • Gestion des rendez-vous
  • Intégration des médias sociaux
  • Messagerie instantanée
  • Mesure des performances
  • Portail libre-service
  • Automate d'appel
  • Gestion des centres d'appel
  • Gestion des contacts
  • Gestion du télémarketing
  • Numéroteur prédictif (predictive dialer)
  • Rapports et analyses
  • Reconnaissance SVI et vocale
  • Suivi des appels
  • VoIP
  • Alertes et remontée des problèmes
  • Chat en temps réel
  • Communication multicanal
  • Gestion de la base de connaissances
  • Gestion des accords de service
  • Gestion des billets
  • Gestion des ressources informatiques
  • Intégration des e-mails
  • Monitoring réseau
  • Portail libre-service
  • Routage automatisé
  • Stockage de documents
  • Stratégie de marque personnalisable
  • Suivi des interactions
  • Centre d'appel mixte
  • Centre d'appels entrants
  • Centre d'appels sortants
  • Chat en temps réel
  • Enregistrement des appels
  • Gestion de la remontée des problèmes
  • Gestion des campagnes
  • Gestion des listes d'attente
  • Journalisation des appels
  • Mode progressif (progressive dialer)
  • Numéroteur manuel
  • Numéroteur prédictif (predictive dialer)
  • Rapports et analyses
  • Réponse vocale interactive
  • Scripts d'appel

Avis les plus utiles sur NICE inContact CXone

Incontact has features but requires commitment of time and learning

Publié le 05/11/2019
Rob H.
WFM Phone Routing Coordinator
Vente au détail, 501-1 000 employés
Temps d'utilisation du produit: plus de deux ans
Provenance de l'utilisateur 
4/5
Note globale
3 / 5
Facilité d'utilisation
5 / 5
Fonctionnalités
4 / 5
Support client
4 / 5
Rapport qualité-prix
Probabilité de recommander le produit :
Très faible Très élevée

Commentaires: We had a VERY rocky start. I believe that most of the issues were with our implementation manager. I have mostly re-written and fixed the studio scripts and eliminated most of the routing issues. I do very much like the universal availability of Soft phone to be used from anywhere and that you can use it with most browsers and operating systems. The auto dialer is definitely the best program in the product. List penetration and reporting make it easy to reach more patients/clients with no lag/delay between reaching the person and speaking with them.

Avantages: The available features are great. Hands down, the best auto dialer I have experienced but the set up and testing will take several weeks to tweak to your preference. Logging in from anywhere is very beneficial. Always updated to make the product new and innovative. All-in-one products available. One stop shop for QR, WFM, softphone and Forecasting. Although the program requires a lot of troubleshooting and upkeep, I will admit that it does not go all the way down very often.

Inconvénients: Implementation fees for anything you want to do. For something as simple as SMS response to advance chat. There are costs and fees for everything down to the nickel and dime. This caused us to develop our own server to store calls (due to storage costs), our QR program is 3rd party and our chat program now. We started with Uptivity which is being discontinued 12/31/2019. The new program they suggested was a very large increase in price. So we went with separate company for our QR needs. Turn around is very slow for add-ons and requested changes/features. I highly recommend a well versed main contact with knowledge in building programs, telephony/studio, and user access/security to be a go to person. This will save you time and money in the long run. A program that is always being tweaked requires several updates. The updates can take away from business and cause errors/issues for several users. I typically set my week aside whenever a new release is upcoming so that I can help troubleshoot.

Réponse de l'éditeur

envoyé par NICE inContact le 25/11/2019

Thank you for the detailed review, Rob! We are always striving to improve and will make sure to pass along your comments to our development team. We are happy to hear the auto dialer is working well.

USERHUB Review - RentPath

Publié le 03/10/2019
Brandon W.
Manager, Telecommunications
Internet, 1 001-5 000 employés
Temps d'utilisation du produit: plus de deux ans
Provenance de l'utilisateur 
5/5
Note globale
5 / 5
Facilité d'utilisation
5 / 5
Fonctionnalités
5 / 5
Support client
5 / 5
Rapport qualité-prix
Probabilité de recommander le produit :
Très faible Très élevée

Avantages: I work with InContact very intimately from agent facing to back end routing. This software provides a very likable GUI, ease of use, and never fails to deliver quality and overall performance across the board. Being able to truly rely on a contact center solution to deliver as promised is non existent... unless you use InContact. Quality Plans within QM are a life saver! Having our QA team and Supervisors not have to go through calls manually will save us so much time, ultimately allowing us to spend time in other areas that are just as important. We love the Analytics of being able to see sentiment on calls! The accuracy is beyond impressive and is really going to set us ahead of the competition now that we are able to see specific keywords and/or phrases that our agents and our clients are saying. We'd love to be able to report on these key phrases and words to help us grow further! The biggest advantage we were able to gain as an organization was coming from Central with 18,000+ skills and reducing them within USERHUB to 14. This will help us immensely with WFM to be able to forecast accurately knowing that we aren't having to add new queues on a daily basis with the potential of huge error over time.

Inconvénients: As we have come from Central to USERHUB, there has been a lack in QM Reporting ( only 3 reports ) and we have been challenged with Quality Plans not being able to replace calls if they are not a fit for that form designated to that plan. There is an upcoming release that is slated for our cluster on Oct 10th that will give us that function which is great. There is also no Print function for completed QA's. If the Evaluator made a mistake and the agent acknowledges the QA, there is no way to delete a completed or acknowledged QA which creates headaches for our staff. It would make sense to be able to edit a completed QA outside of an agent challenging it. We have also noticed that same calls can be pulled across different Quality Plans - some may not see this as an issue but we like to QA unique phone calls vs ones that have been already scored by someone else. When doing evaluations through the quality plans, there is no call details to look up within a CRM as an example (disposition,callID,DNIS,ANI) Also in the Evaluation Report, if there is a Yes/No question that is score-able with N/A and N/A is selected on the QA form, the Maximum Score Possible column in that report does not remove the total points for that question, which provides inaccurate scores. Also, it seems that the QA Average that is shown in Performance Monitoring is taking an average of the QA's by the percentage when it should be total sum score column / total sum maximu etcm possible score column.

Réponse de l'éditeur

envoyé par NICE inContact le 29/10/2019

Thank you so much for the detailed feedback. We are happy to hear it is working for you and appreciate you bringing the challenges to our attention. We are always striving to make improvements and will pass along your comments to the appropriate teams.

Call Center software with great functionality

Publié le 11/12/2018
Paul K.
Quality Manager
Appareils médicaux, 10 001+ employés
Temps d'utilisation du produit: plus de deux ans
Provenance de l'utilisateur 
5/5
Note globale
5 / 5
Facilité d'utilisation
4 / 5
Fonctionnalités
5 / 5
Support client
5 / 5
Rapport qualité-prix
Probabilité de recommander le produit :
Très faible Très élevée

Commentaires: Before utilizing a call center software we provided our individual teams members phone numbers to the customers. This created multiple issues that were unsustainable as the organization grew. Customer complaints started to rise that we were not reachable via phone, that voicemails were not returned in a timely fashion or at all, and there was no data available to evaluate staffing performance and additional resource requirements. InContact solved the majority of these issues and we are now able to not only evaluate the points above, but also categorize the calls through dispositions used to improve call routings. However, there is no report that actually includes all three disposition fields. Only the primary disposition and the disposition comments are available in canned or custom data reports, the secondary disposition can only be reviewed for each call individually in the contact history report.

Avantages: Our company upgraded to InContact a few years ago from TASKE. As the local system administrator for one of our sites that uses this software, I provide data reports to all teams tailored to their specific needs. The amount of raw data that can be extracted from InContact is enormous and is very helpful for operation and individual performance evaluation and optimization.

Inconvénients: For our business unit having to transfer calls is not only inefficient, but also not seen as good customer service. There are no easy to use reports available, neither canned nor custom, that would allow simple evaluation of transferred calls that can be reviewed. Additionally, our main business unit running InContact is located in another time zone. Working with InContact Support, there is no way around some time zone issues when setting hours of operations for our local units. When I try to override our normal hours of operations to close the queues for lets say one hour between 2 pm and 3 pm CST, I have to set the end time to 4 pm EST. This would be less confusing if the override wouldn't display the close time incorrectly on my end then, as the notification and countdown will say that it is currently 2 pm and that the business unit is closed for 2 hours until 4 pm.

It works great, with very few cons

Publié le 12/11/2019
Erik P.
Sr Call Center Technology
Énergies renouvelables et environnement, 1 001-5 000 employés
Temps d'utilisation du produit: plus de deux ans
Provenance de l'utilisateur 
5/5
Note globale
5 / 5
Facilité d'utilisation
4 / 5
Fonctionnalités
4 / 5
Support client
5 / 5
Rapport qualité-prix
Probabilité de recommander le produit :
Très faible Très élevée

Avantages: We like it because it's solid VoIP product that uses a low bandwidth codec, without sacrificing quality.

Inconvénients: A few of the settings aren't advertised that they're only configurable on the server-side. For example, the Auto-Answer doesn't always stick when the agent changes the setting themselves. We have to engage inContact's customer support to make that change on the Server config settings. That's annoying.

Réponse de l'éditeur

envoyé par NICE inContact le 25/11/2019

Erik, we appreciate the specific feedback. We will pass it on to the our product teams. Thank you for the review.

Constant issues - arguments with Support Teams on validity of issues

Publié le 10/09/2019
Jonathan H.
Chief Infrastructure & Data Officer
Hôpitaux et soins de santé, 201-500 employés
Temps d'utilisation du produit: plus de deux ans
Provenance de l'utilisateur 
4/5
Note globale
4 / 5
Facilité d'utilisation
3 / 5
Fonctionnalités
2 / 5
Support client
1 / 5
Rapport qualité-prix
Probabilité de recommander le produit :
Très faible Très élevée

Avantages: When it works, it's smooth. Its highly customizable for call queues and trees.

Inconvénients: Support is atrocious; constant and large outages (anywhere from 5min to a couple of hours means that all call center staff cannot take/make calls which cripples us). We've had an open support ticket closed on us 6+ times because support says the issue is resolved even when we continue to present evidence it's not resolved. Ongoing issues for 2 months now, still no resolution.

Réponse de l'éditeur

envoyé par NICE inContact le 25/09/2019

Hi Jonathan. Your business if very important to us. We'll get in touch with your service team to find out about these issues to get them resolved.

Lire d'autres avis