17 ans à aider les entreprises françaises
à choisir le meilleur logiciel
MetaCompliance
Description de MetaCompliance
Ce logiciel de gestion des politiques automatise le cycle de vie de votre gestion des politiques et fournit la "force probante" nécessaire pour protéger les entreprises contre la dégradation de la marque et les menaces à leur réputation.
De la création à la gestion, en passant par la publication et la livraison, ce logiciel cloud de gestion des politiques augmente le taux de participation aux politiques, permet d'obtenir facilement l'attestation des employés aux politiques clés et intègre une culture de la conformité.
Qui utilise MetaCompliance ?
Les entreprises qui souhaitent faire face aux défis liés à la conformité, à la gestion des règlements et à la sensibilisation des utilisateurs. Ce logiciel peut engager et former les utilisateurs ou, si nécessaire, imposer leur participation.
MetaCompliance ne vous convainc pas tout à fait ?
Comparer avec une alternative populaire
MetaCompliance
Avis sur MetaCompliance
Bon logiciel de learning
Avantages :
Facile à prendre en main, le logiciel apporte des rapports efficaces
Inconvénients :
L'interconnexion en SSO avec Azure Directory, nous avons eu besoin du support qui n'est pas réactif.
MetaPhish is a great platform for IT security work in user awareness
Commentaires : A great product, pleased we selected it.
Avantages :
Really easy to launch quality Phishing tests to the business. Wide range of templates available. The platform makes it easy to set mandatory user training for any user that clicks on the Phishing email.
Inconvénients :
There is nothing in the application that we do not like or find difficult to use.
Great learning platform
Commentaires : This is a great platform to get you started teaching Cyber security. the videos are short, clear and the message is interesting to everyone.
Avantages :
I liked the content characters and the way they got the massage across was visually pleasing.Some of the videos are based around current news events, and that is a really great way to tech the content.
Inconvénients :
The campaign builder was difficult to get used to, for some reason i could never find the wider library when i needed it. I also used up most of the content inside 2 years. And im reluctant to reuse the same content.
A useful tool, though has it's limitations
Commentaires : It's a useful tool but if you are not using the admin console on a regular basis then it becomes time consuming as you need to refamiliarize yourself each time - it is not intuitive or obvious how to upload a document or course.
Avantages :
I like being able to categorize the content making it easier for end user experience and also from a reporting perspective.
Inconvénients :
When it comes to uploading a SCORM course, the user has to select "EXIT" (and not just close the screen) in order for the reporting / status of completion to update - this is regularly not done right by user resulting in inaccurate audits, and a lot of manual review drilling into "Adoption".
Generally good - cost effective, with a responsive support team.
Commentaires : It's pretty good but there seem to be a lot of missed tricks. Some of the reporting functions are clunky.
Avantages :
The policies feature is pretty good and the more recent developments. Fusion courses which allows mix and matching of the better out of the box content with our own.
Inconvénients :
Older out of the box courses are dull and feature computerised narration that often emphasises the wrong word or pauses in the wrong places - and this undermines the ability for users to get the main point. Out of the box quizes - some of the wrong/right answers are arbitrary and seem designed to catch people out rather than educate. It would be useful if the answers to the questions could be amended. Policy/Course Adoption Reporting functions: data exports don't include the name of the course or policy the report relates to. Can only target courses/policies at OU level or manually-created circulation lists that must be manually maintained. Our OUs are based on physical location rather than department. but the software clearly pulls through the department name from our AD. But it doesn't allow targetting based on department name. Seems to be a missed trick. Automated reminders should be possible to an individual's manager, not just the targetted individual AD sync always seems to be cuasing problems resulting in account issues, policies not being targetted at new users etc. Overall compliance pie charts include all policies/training including the optional ones. Not useful if you have a number of information-only policies in the system. Would be better to have an overall status on mandatory policies as these are the ones that need to be reported on for compliance. Uncompliant user reports only contain people that have recieved all of the reminders.