15 ans à aider les entreprises françaises
à choisir le meilleur logiciel

Description de Blue

Blue est une plateforme holistique de gestion de l’expérience conçue pour gérer les initiatives d’opinion les plus populaires, des opinions des étudiants sur l’enseignement à la motivation des collaborateurs sur le lieu de travail.

Conçu pour prendre en charge vos processus d’opinion les plus importants, notamment les évaluations de cours, les enquêtes d’engagement et les évaluations à 360 degrés, Blue exploite votre infrastructure existante (SIS, SIRH, LMS, SSO, CRM, etc.) grâce à ses capacités d’intégration de premier ordre pour une automatisation inégalée, une sécurité optimale et une confidentialité des données.

Qui utilise Blue ?

Structures nécessitant une solution logicielle d'enquête robuste et flexible qui s'adapte à leurs processus de gestion des opinions et réponde à leurs besoins particuliers en se centrant sur l'automatisation, la flexibilité, l'évolutivité et la sécurité.

Blue Logiciel - 1
Blue Logiciel - 2
Blue Logiciel - 3
Blue Logiciel - 4
Blue Logiciel - 5

Blue ne vous convainc pas tout à fait ? Comparer avec une alternative populaire

Blue

Blue

4,6 (51)
7 500,00 $US
année
Version gratuite
Version d'essai gratuite
67
15
3,8 (51)
4,2 (51)
4,8 (51)
VS.
À partir de
Types de licence
Fonctionnalités
Intégrations
Facilité d'utilisation
Rapport qualité-prix
Service client
6,00 €
Version gratuite
Version d'essai gratuite
212
6
4,7 (140)
4,7 (140)
4,8 (140)
Les jauges horizontales vertes représentent le logiciel le plus apprécié selon la note globale qui lui a été attribuée ainsi que le nombre d'avis.

Alternatives à Blue

Bizneo HR
Fonctionnalités les mieux notées
Base de données des employés
Gestion des feuilles de temps
Gestion des ressources humaines
Strategy & Research
Fonctionnalités les mieux notées
Créateur d'enquêtes
Division des questions (question branching)
Rapports et analyses
Sakai LMS
Fonctionnalités les mieux notées
Apprentissage mobile
Suivi des cours
Tests et évaluations
niikiis
Fonctionnalités les mieux notées
Planification du personnel
Suivi du temps en ligne
Suivi du temps en ligne
SkillsBoard
Fonctionnalités les mieux notées
Gestion de l'apprentissage
Portail des apprenants
Suivi continu des performances
Jotform
Fonctionnalités les mieux notées
Champs personnalisables
Création et conception de formulaires
Formulaires personnalisables
Factorial
Fonctionnalités les mieux notées
Base de données des employés
Gestion de la paie
Pointage
intelliHR
Fonctionnalités les mieux notées
Base de données des employés
Intégration des employés
Rapports et analyses
Talentia HCM
Fonctionnalités les mieux notées
Aucune fonctionnalité n'a été évaluée par les utilisateurs de ce logiciel.

Avis sur Blue

Note moyenne

Note globale
4,6
Facilité d'utilisation
3,8
Service client
4,8
Fonctionnalités
4,5
Rapport qualité-prix
4,2

Avis classés par taille de l'entreprise (nombre d'employés)

  • <50
  • 51-200
  • 201-1 000
  • >1 001

Trouver les avis classés par note

5
67%
4
27%
3
6%
Utilisateur vérifié
Utilisateur LinkedIn vérifié
Enseignement supérieur, 10 000+ employés
Temps d'utilisation du logiciel : plus de deux ans
Source de l'avis

Robust Product with Excellent Support

5,0 il y a 5 ans

Commentaires : We use Blue to manage the course evaluation process across the entire university. I am one of about a dozen users who each manage an individual school within the university. Mine is the largest (comprising about 60% of courses offered and closer to 75% of courses evaluated).
Our university has been using Blue for about three years now. We chose this software after negative experiences with our last vendor, and we were specifically looking for something that could provide all of the below:
1) Automated data feed from our student information system (SIS) to Blue.
2) Customization for each school using the software.
3) Unified email messaging (one email per student per school regardless of number of courses involved).
4) Ability to handle large and complex questionnaires with built in triggering to ask the right questions for each individual course and instructor.
5) Ability to customize opening and closing dates for evaluations down to the course level.
6) Ability to manage both mid-term and end-of-course evaluations.
7) Ability to evaluate multiple instructors for a single course with a seamless experience for students (course and all instructors on a single questionnaire) and automatic distribution of data to separate reports per instructor (all receive course responses but each sees only their instructor responses).
I am the most advanced user on our campus, both based on training and based on the extensiveness with which I use the software. For most users here, the cour

Avantages :

The robust amount of features. Ability to copy setup from one term to the next. Ability to extensively customize evaluation process. Ability to correct an error, add a course, or otherwise update data after evaluations have started. Commitment of Explorance to improving the software based on customer feedback. Variety of training options and levels, including customer and Explorance staff led monthly webinars.

Inconvénients :

High learning curve for new users. Some of the limitations in reporting (less direct control of size/layout of displayed graphics, inability to do certain calculations in export to excel reports).

candace
ed tech specialist (É.-U.)
Enseignement supérieur, 1 001–5 000 employés
Temps d'utilisation du logiciel : plus de deux ans
Source de l'avis

great product - great company

5,0 il y a 3 ans

Commentaires : Blue is a great product - eXplorance is a great company.

Avantages :

Blue has a lot of features and integrates well with our other systems.

Inconvénients :

Blue is somewhat complicated to administer.

Amber
Senior Analyst (Canada)
Enseignement supérieur, 201–500 employés
Temps d'utilisation du logiciel : plus de deux ans
Source de l'avis

Steep learning curve and limited out of box reporting capabilities

3,0 il y a 3 ans

Commentaires : Onboarding is fairly difficult. The product is complex, even to set up a basic project. It is easy to make mistakes and not enough safe-guards built in. Training new users is either very time consuming or expensive depending on whether you train in house or purchase training from Blue. The interface is not very aesthetically pleasing and the survey layouts are also difficult to make visually appealing and tend to need a lot of tinkering to make things line up and look nice. The documentation is hit and miss as far as whether it is helpful. Customer service is good with simple issues. Complex problems tend to drag on and require a lot of time commitment on the client-end to sort out.

Avantages :

Projects are highly customizable as far as questionnaire content is concerned.

Inconvénients :

Easy to make mistakes. Error logs usually do not provide useful information. Project set up takes more time than it should. Text export includes residual html characters that need to be converted/cleaned up before text analysis in external software. Reporting is limited and the visuals are very unattractive. Modifying the visuals is labor intensive. Much easier to export data and use an external tool. Data source set up and intermediary relationship tables unnecessarily complicate the process. The product does not take into account that more than one department in an organization may use the product i.e. a default email address that is required by the system but may result in sensitive information being shared from reports if the to/from/cc fields are not filled out properly on a report that is being disseminated via email.

Matthew
Assistant Director (É.-U.)
Enseignement supérieur, 5 001–10 000 employés
Temps d'utilisation du logiciel : plus de deux ans
Source de l'avis

Alternatives envisagées précédemment :

Exceeding expectations and solving business needs

5,0 il y a 3 ans

Avantages :

This software allowed us to transition from paper based to electronic reviews. It provided a large community of experienced users from which to learn best practices. It created a safe, reliable platform to maximize our evaluation process.

Inconvénients :

when a subject changes their evaluation dates, they are not reflected in all the related data tables. dynamic dates do update when reminder emails are sent. course questions vs. instructor questions and how to configure in reports.

Greg
Manager, Institutional Research (Canada)
Enseignement supérieur, 1 001–5 000 employés
Temps d'utilisation du logiciel : plus de deux ans
Source de l'avis

Higher Ed review of Blue - +10 years and still going!

5,0 il y a 3 ans

Commentaires : Overall I've had a positive experience working with Blue. Their support team is fairly knowledgeable and hands-on. Their development team is also fairly responsive to 'feature requests' which is great. My team uses the product almost daily where it satisfies most (if not all) of our survey requirements. I've enjoyed seeing Blue evolve over the past 10+ years and look forward to working with it in the future.

Avantages :

I've been a blue user for 10+ years and work with the product almost daily. We use it primarily for student surveys such as Student Satisfaction, Course Evaluations, and Graduate Outcomes. We also use Blue to collect information from other stakeholders (i.e. Industry, Employees, Employers, Alumni, etc). Creating surveys is easy and intuitive for my small research team. We typically do not have any down-time with this product besides the occasional maintenance shutdown to our onsite hosted environment.

Inconvénients :

Blue is a great product for surveying stakeholders at our institution however the way they deploy features to only certain blue products makes using the software challenging. A feature available in a course evaluation survey for example may not be available in another survey 'product'. I find this challenging as I've often had to recreate complete projects in order to take advantage of certain project/reporting features. The products should be seamless and integrated across all surveys in blue... For example, DRA - Dynamic Report Access is a great feature for dynamically assigning reports to a role (vs. an individual user), however is not available for use with a standard survey.