--- description: RIB SpecLink : qu'en pensent les utilisateurs ? Lisez les avis clients sur RIB SpecLink, consultez les prix, tarifs, abonnements et découvrez ses fonctionnalités. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: RIB SpecLink - Avis, notes, prix et abonnements - Capterra France 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Accueil](/) > [Logiciels d'architecture](/directory/20002/architecture/software) > [RIB SpecLink](/software/1021444/speclink) # RIB SpecLink Canonical: https://www.capterra.fr/software/1021444/speclink Page : 1/6\ Suivant: [Page suivante](https://www.capterra.fr/software/1021444/speclink?page=2) > Un système de cahier des charges des guides de référence avancé. > > Conclusion : 118 utilisateurs lui ont donné la note de **4.5/5**. Figure au meilleur classement pour **Probabilité de recommander le produit**. ----- ## Présentation ### Qui utilise RIB SpecLink ? RIB Software développe et vend des outils logiciels innovants pour les marchés de l’architecture, de l’ingénierie et du bâtiment en Amérique du Nord. ## Statistiques et notes | Métrique | Notation | En détail | | **Note globale** | **4.5/5** | 118 Avis | | Simplicité d’utilisation | 4.3/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Support client | 4.5/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Rapport qualité-prix | 4.3/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Fonctionnalités | 4.2/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Pourcentage de recommandation | 90% | (9/10 Probabilité de recommander le produit) | ## À propos de l'éditeur - **Société**: RIB Software - **Entreprise fondée en**: 1961 ## Contexte commercial - **Type de licence**: (pendant l'essai gratuit) - **Public cible**: Auto-entrepreneur, 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1 000, 1 001–5 000, 5 001–10 000, 10 000+ - **Déploiement et plateformes**: Cloud, SaaS, web - **Langues**: anglais - **Pays disponibles**: Allemagne, Arabie saoudite, Bahamas, Bermudes, Canada, Chine, Chypre, Costa Rica, Danemark, Espagne, Estonie, Finlande, France, Grèce, Géorgie, Hongrie, Inde, Irlande, Islande, Italie et 16 de plus ## Fonctionnalités - Gestion de projets - Gestion des documents - Imagerie 3D - Importation et exportation de données - Modélisation BIM - Planification ## Ressources d'aide - Base de connaissances - Support téléphonique - Chat ## Category - [Logiciels d'architecture](https://www.capterra.fr/directory/20002/architecture/software) ## Catégories connexes - [Logiciels d'architecture](https://www.capterra.fr/directory/20002/architecture/software) - [Logiciels de gestion de construction](https://www.capterra.fr/directory/30057/construction-management/software) ## Logiciels similaires 1. [Design Flex](https://www.capterra.fr/software/218525/2020-design-live) — 4.3/5 (357 reviews) 2. [AutoCAD](https://www.capterra.fr/software/174021/autocad) — 4.7/5 (3213 reviews) 3. [Programa](https://www.capterra.fr/software/1026990/programa) — 4.8/5 (73 reviews) 4. [Revit](https://www.capterra.fr/software/183122/revit) — 4.6/5 (484 reviews) 5. [ARCHICAD](https://www.capterra.fr/software/2018/archicad) — 4.4/5 (280 reviews) ## Avis ### "RZ SpecLink Review" — 4.0/5 > **Utilisateur vérifié** | *9 août 2024* | Design | Taux de recommandation : 10.0/10 > > **Avantages**: Cloud-based, auto-updates and less editing > > **Inconvénients**: Not the most user friendly and time-consuming > > It is certainly an upgrade over the traditional word documents ----- ### "Great Product" — 4.0/5 > **Perry** | *24 juin 2025* | Design | Taux de recommandation : 10.0/10 > > **Avantages**: I am delighted with the concept of exclusion and inclusion in specification writing. It makes the process very adaptable to other similar projects. > > **Inconvénients**: When I use typical symbols such as "\&," the software is confused and substitutes words that don't make sense. > > I am satisfied with the software. I wish there were training videos for identifying what should be linked and how when writing new template specifications. Also, a training video that explains where all the specification details and assemblies originate and how they are connected to the product. ----- ### "DR SpecLink Review" — 3.0/5 > **Dan** | *1 avril 2026* | Biotechnologie | Taux de recommandation : 6.0/10 > > **Avantages**: Most features fairly closely mimic MSWord which makes it simple to use. Easy to remove sections and paragraphs from specs/documents. > > **Inconvénients**: Editor notes are difficult to recognize. Not intuitive to be able to copy and paste Word content into SpecLink documents. Printing documents could be more user friendly. > > Overall good experience. Most of the features are simple and easy to understand and use. Easy to set up project documentation using SpecLink. ----- ### "SpecLink has improved the quality of my specifications." — 5.0/5 > **David** | *27 mai 2025* | Urbanisme et architecture | Taux de recommandation : 10.0/10 > > **Avantages**: Easily mastered for spec writing. Makes writing specs faster, leaner and more consistent. The links within is brilliant. Also, it makes the updating of reference standards extremely simple. > > **Inconvénients**: The spell check is on a section by section basis and the default is off. One must remember to turn this on for each section. > > As a former Word user, SpecLink is far, far better. I would not go back. I can write specs more efficiently. I can spend more time developing quality specifications than I would in Word having to deal with formatting and headers and footers. SpecLink does that in one simple step. Plus nothing is 'lost' as it would be in Word if something is deleted. The turn-on, turn-off keeps everything in the spec always. ----- ### "Great platform with greater potential" — 4.0/5 > **Nicholas** | *27 mai 2025* | Urbanisme et architecture | Taux de recommandation : 8.0/10 > > **Avantages**: I really appreciate the potential for automation and streamlining tasks. Many tasks are accomplished much more easily than the old-fashioned way already, and I know that the development team is actively working on improvements large and small. > > **Inconvénients**: I wish there was more robust and granular control for customization of features within the actual workflow. Many features seem like they could be small but have a large impact on the process of producing documents on the platform. > > Overall, I think speclink has provided a simple workflow, and good time-saving features that have sreamlined our spec writing process. There are always more features and customizations that I think could help the platform, so I appreciate the way the development and support team is available and receptive to users' input. ----- Page : 1/6\ Suivant: [Page suivante](https://www.capterra.fr/software/1021444/speclink?page=2) ## Liens - [Afficher sur Capterra](https://www.capterra.fr/software/1021444/speclink) ## Cette page est disponible dans les langues suivantes. | Langue | URL | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | ----- ## Données structurées