--- description: #paid : qu'en pensent les utilisateurs ? Lisez les avis clients sur #paid, consultez les prix, tarifs, abonnements et découvrez ses fonctionnalités. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: #paid - Avis, notes, prix et abonnements - Capterra France 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Accueil](/) > [Logiciels de marketing d'influence](/directory/31337/influencer-marketing/software) > [\#paid](/software/1014723/hashtag-paid) # \#paid Canonical: https://www.capterra.fr/software/1014723/hashtag-paid Page : 1/3\ Suivant: [Page suivante](https://www.capterra.fr/software/1014723/hashtag-paid?page=2) > \#paid aide les marques à lancer des campagnes marketing de créateur, rapidement et facilement. > > Conclusion : 50 utilisateurs lui ont donné la note de **4.6/5**. Figure au meilleur classement pour **Probabilité de recommander le produit**. ----- ## Présentation ### Qui utilise \#paid ? Marques DTC (Direct-To-Consumer), marques B2C du Fortune 500 et agences marketing. ## Statistiques et notes | Métrique | Notation | En détail | | **Note globale** | **4.6/5** | 50 Avis | | Simplicité d’utilisation | 4.5/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Support client | 4.3/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Rapport qualité-prix | 4.3/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Fonctionnalités | 4.3/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Pourcentage de recommandation | 80% | (8/10 Probabilité de recommander le produit) | ## À propos de l'éditeur - **Société**: Hashtag Paid ## Contexte commercial - **Prix à partir de**: 449,00 $US - **Public cible**: Auto-entrepreneur, 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1 000, 1 001–5 000, 5 001–10 000, 10 000+ - **Déploiement et plateformes**: Cloud, SaaS, web - **Langues**: anglais, français - **Pays disponibles**: Canada, États-Unis ## Fonctionnalités - Analyse des campagnes - Découverte d'influenceurs - Gestion des campagnes - Gestion des relations avec les influenceurs - ROI Tracking - Suivi des promoteurs ## Ressources d'aide - Service client/e-mail - FAQ/forums - Base de connaissances ## Category - [Logiciels de marketing d'influence](https://www.capterra.fr/directory/31337/influencer-marketing/software) ## Logiciels similaires 1. [Later Influence](https://www.capterra.fr/software/186912/mavrck) — 4.6/5 (135 reviews) 2. [OpenSponsorship](https://www.capterra.fr/software/1013491/opensponsorship) — 4.8/5 (40 reviews) 3. [Grin](https://www.capterra.fr/software/173654/grin) — 4.7/5 (147 reviews) 4. [Julius](https://www.capterra.fr/software/175488/julius) — 4.5/5 (107 reviews) 5. [Upfluence](https://www.capterra.fr/software/162056/upfluence) — 4.4/5 (44 reviews) ## Avis ### "Easy-to-Use Platform for Influencer Campaign Management" — 5.0/5 > **Mohammed** | *6 mai 2026* | Services et technologies de l'information | Taux de recommandation : 10.0/10 > > **Avantages**: Paid makes influencer discovery simple and efficient, allowing brands to quickly find creators that match their target audience and campaign goals. The platform is very easy to use, with a clean dashboard and smooth campaign management tools that help keep collaborations organized from start to finish. I also liked the overall value for money, especially considering the time saved in managing influencer partnerships. Customer support has been responsive and helpful whenever assistance was needed, and the platform overall provides a streamlined experience for running influencer marketing campaigns. > > **Inconvénients**: While Paid is generally easy to use, there are still occasional bugs and small technical issues that can affect the experience during campaign management. The platform offers good influencer discovery features, but finding the right creators for very specific niches can sometimes be time-consuming. Customer support is helpful overall, although response times may vary depending on the issue. In some cases, the pricing can feel slightly high for smaller businesses, especially when additional campaign features are needed. Contract and refund processes could also be clearer and more flexible for both brands and cr > > My overall experience with paid has been positive. The platform makes influencer discovery and campaign management much easier compared to handling collaborations manually. I liked how user-friendly the dashboard is, and the process of finding creators, organizing campaigns, and tracking communication feels very streamlined. Customer support was also responsive whenever I had questions. While there are occasional minor bugs and some features that could offer deeper analytics, the platform still provides strong value for brands looking to manage influencer marketing efficiently. ----- ### "Easy and reliable for influencer campaigns" — 4.0/5 > **Utilisateur vérifié** | *4 novembre 2025* | Services et technologies de l'information | Taux de recommandation : 8.0/10 > > **Avantages**: Very simple to find and work with influencers. The dashboard is clean, and managing campaigns takes less time. Customer support is quick and friendly. > > **Inconvénients**: Reports lack detailed insights, and the site occasionally slows down during campaign updates. Good overall, but performance and report depth could improve for the price. > > \#paid makes influencer marketing smooth and stress-free. It’s user-friendly, reliable, and great for running multiple campaigns efficiently. ----- ### "Streamlines campaign management" — 4.0/5 > **Utilisateur vérifié** | *20 septembre 2026* | Construction | Taux de recommandation : 8.0/10 > > **Avantages**: Easy to get up and running without a big learning curve. As an operations manager I care about clear workflows, and campaigns were simple to set up, track, and keep organized. Communication with creators stays in one place instead of scattered across email and spreadsheets, which saves real time. > > **Inconvénients**: Reporting could go deeper. I wanted more customizable views to share with leadership without exporting and reformatting. A few small workflow quirks also slowed things down when managing multiple campaigns at once. > > I manage multiple teams and juggle a lot of moving parts, so I look for tools that cut admin work and make status easy to see at a glance. \#paid delivered on that. It streamlined campaign coordination, kept everything in one place, and made it easier to track progress without chasing people for updates. It's not perfect, and I'd like more flexible reporting, but for teams that want a straightforward way to run creator campaigns, it's a solid option. ----- ### "Application utile Simplification des tâches" — 3.0/5 > **Patrick** | *20 mars 2024* | Biens de consommation | Taux de recommandation : 6.0/10 > > **Avantages**: Interface conviviale : Une conception intuitive et une navigation simplifiée améliorent l'expérience utilisateur. Innovation : Une fonctionnalité unique distingue l'application de ses concurrents. > > **Inconvénients**: Coût élevé : Les frais d'abonnement et les achats intégrés sont plus élevés. Conception médiocre : Interfaces complexes et présentations parfois déroutantes. > > C'est une bonne application mais pas la meilleure du marché. ----- ### ""Connex System Review: Useful but Hampered by Slow Performance and Complex Navigation"" — 4.0/5 > **Kobedinyana** | *9 juillet 2026* | Services aux consommateurs | Taux de recommandation : 5.0/10 > > **Avantages**: Connex system too good , fast ,relaible and works so good on outbound and inbound calls for a call center company. > > **Inconvénients**: The least liked aspects of the Connex system often center on usability and efficiency. Many users find the navigation overly complex, requiring too many clicks to reach commonly used features, which slows down workflows. Performance issues such as slow loading times or occasional timeouts add to the frustration, especially when handling urgent tasks. Integration with other systems is not always seamless, leading to duplicated entries or manual reconciliation of data. Reporting tools are also seen as limited, with rigid structures that make it difficult to customize or drill down into specific details. Finally, the steep learning curve and limited onboarding support make it challenging for new users to adapt quickly, leaving them feeling overwhelmed. > > Overall, my experience with the Connex system has been mixed, leaning toward functional but often frustrating. On the positive side, it does provide a centralized platform that brings together multiple processes and systems, which is useful for managing complex tasks. However, the navigation feels cumbersome, requiring too many steps to reach essential features, and the system’s performance can be inconsistent, with slow loading times or occasional timeouts. Integration with other platforms is not always seamless, which means I sometimes have to duplicate entries or manually reconcile data. The reporting tools also feel restrictive, offering limited customization and making it difficult to drill down into specific details. Finally, the steep learning curve and lack of intuitive onboarding make it challenging for new users to adapt quickly. Altogether, while Connex is capable, the overall experience is hindered by inefficiencies and usability issues that impact productivity. ----- Page : 1/3\ Suivant: [Page suivante](https://www.capterra.fr/software/1014723/hashtag-paid?page=2) ## Liens - [Afficher sur Capterra](https://www.capterra.fr/software/1014723/hashtag-paid) ## Cette page est disponible dans les langues suivantes. | Langue | URL | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | ----- ## Données structurées