--- description: ProContractor : qu'en pensent les utilisateurs ? Lisez les avis clients sur ProContractor, consultez les prix, tarifs, abonnements et découvrez ses fonctionnalités. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: ProContractor - Avis, notes, prix et abonnements - Capterra France 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Accueil](/) > [Logiciels de gestion de construction](/directory/30057/construction-management/software) > [ProContractor](/software/1010522/procontractor) # ProContractor Canonical: https://www.capterra.fr/software/1010522/procontractor Page : 1/11\ Suivant: [Page suivante](https://www.capterra.fr/software/1010522/procontractor?page=2) > Solution de gestion tout-en-un pour les entreprises du bâtiment en pleine croissance. Bénéficiez de données en temps réel et de transparence dans l'ensemble de l'entreprise. > > Conclusion : 234 utilisateurs lui ont donné la note de **3.5/5**. Figure au meilleur classement pour **Probabilité de recommander le produit**. ----- ## Présentation ### Qui utilise ProContractor ? ProContractor est particulièrement adapté aux petits entrepreneurs généraux commerciaux, aux entrepreneurs lourds/civils, aux prestataires de services électriques, aux entrepreneurs en mécanique, en plomberie, en CVC (chauffage, ventilation et climatisation), etc. ## Statistiques et notes | Métrique | Notation | En détail | | **Note globale** | **3.5/5** | 234 Avis | | Simplicité d’utilisation | 3.2/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Support client | 3.3/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Rapport qualité-prix | 3.1/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Fonctionnalités | 3.4/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Pourcentage de recommandation | 60% | (6/10 Probabilité de recommander le produit) | ## À propos de l'éditeur - **Société**: Trimble - **Pays**: Princeton, É.-U. - **Entreprise fondée en**: 1978 ## Contexte commercial - **Public cible**: 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1 000, 1 001–5 000, 5 001–10 000, 10 000+ - **Déploiement et plateformes**: Cloud, SaaS, web, Windows (ordinateur), Android (mobile), iPhone (mobile) - **Langues**: anglais - **Pays disponibles**: Canada, États-Unis ## Fonctionnalités - Gestion des documents - Planification - Recherche en texte intégral - Saisie de documents - Stockage de documents ## Category - [Logiciels de gestion de construction](https://www.capterra.fr/directory/30057/construction-management/software) ## Catégories connexes - [Logiciels de gestion de construction](https://www.capterra.fr/directory/30057/construction-management/software) - [Logiciels de gestion documentaire](https://www.capterra.fr/directory/30063/document-management/software) ## Logiciels similaires 1. [Contractor Foreman](https://www.capterra.fr/software/166113/contractor-foreman) — 4.5/5 (815 reviews) 2. [Procore](https://www.capterra.fr/software/56250/procore) — 4.5/5 (2656 reviews) 3. [Trimble e-Builder](https://www.capterra.fr/software/2030/e-builder-enterprise) — 4.3/5 (417 reviews) 4. [Houzz Pro](https://www.capterra.fr/software/199689/houzz-pro) — 4.3/5 (1085 reviews) 5. [ConstructionOnline](https://www.capterra.fr/software/160201/constructiononline) — 4.5/5 (596 reviews) ## Avis ### "Jusqu'ici tout va bien, nouveau logiciel \!" — 5.0/5 > **Rachel** | *4 mai 2018* | Construction | Taux de recommandation : 8.0/10 > > **Avantages**: Nous venons de passer à Pro-contractor pour nos estimations, qui offre des fonctionnalités intéressantes, comme la création d'assemblages pour les articles. Cela nous permet de minimiser la quantité d'informations susceptibles d'être source de confusion. Nous apprécions également la possibilité de lier facilement tous les éléments à un poste de travail. > > **Inconvénients**: Ce logiciel est beaucoup plus complexe que ceux que nous utilisons habituellement, ce qui rend sa compréhension plus complexe au cours de la formation. La terminologie utilisée dans ce logiciel est également source de confusion : les codes de coût sont désormais appelés codes de phase, ce qui peut prêter à confusion. > > Je reviendrai après 6 mois complets avec le programme, mais je parie que nos estimations seront plus robustes et réduiront les échecs dans les enchères. ----- ### "Passer d'American Contractor à ProContractor" — 4.0/5 > **Jillian** | *6 juillet 2023* | Construction | Taux de recommandation : 7.0/10 > > **Avantages**: J'apprécie la possibilité de personnaliser la page d'accueil. Cela simplifie grandement le processus de paie, car je peux regrouper tout ce dont j'ai besoin au même endroit et éviter d'avoir à le chercher chaque semaine. Cela me permet également de m'assurer de n'avoir rien oublié. Nous apprécions également la possibilité d'afficher automatiquement certains champs pour les factures, etc. C'est pratique de ne pas avoir à remplir de manière redondante des informations qui resteront presque toujours les mêmes, tout en ayant la possibilité de les modifier au besoin. > > **Inconvénients**: En tant que responsable de la paie, la correction des feuilles de temps présente un inconvénient majeur. Nous avons depuis modifié notre processus afin de minimiser ce problème, mais auparavant, il arrivait que le personnel de terrain me fournisse par erreur un code de coût erroné. Je devais alors les corriger afin que nos rapports d'avancement de projet reflètent correctement les heures travaillées. Il n'existe pas de moyen simple de corriger un ou deux codes de coût sur un bulletin de paie. Pour corriger ces codes, il faut annuler le bulletin de paie entier et le ressaisir. Cela devient fastidieux, surtout si l'erreur se trouve sur la feuille de temps de notre contremaître général, car il visite plusieurs projets chaque jour. L'autre problème rencontré concerne également la paie. Pour la déclaration de paie certifiée, nous ne devons déclarer que les heures de terrain. Certains de nos employés travaillent à la fois sur le terrain et en atelier, et il arrive qu'ils aient des heures aux deux endroits au cours de la même période de paie. Le système ne reconnaît pas la différence entre les codes de coût en atelier et sur le terrain. L'inclusion ou non des heures d'un employé dans les rapports CPR dépend entièrement des informations fournies dans la classe de paie utilisée. De ce fait, j'ai dû créer des classes de paie « atelier » identiques pour chaque classe de paie utilisée et, lors de la saisie des heures d'atelier, je dois m'assurer que la classe de paie automatique est bien celle de la version atelier. ----- ### "Great On-Premise Entry Level System" — 3.0/5 > **Simon** | *6 juillet 2023* | Construction | Taux de recommandation : 1.0/10 > > **Avantages**: Having recently reviewed several enterprise level systems as possible replacements for ProContractor, as we thought we'd outgrown it, we've been struck by the utter simplicity of ProContractor to perform routine, but complex tasks compared to the more sophisticated and more costly competition. Maxwell Systems really did a great job in designing a very comprehensive and robust system for the entry level market. Realizing that we were actually in a very good position after all, we decided to stay with ProContractor, and build our own integrations, but Viewpoint pulled the plug on that idea by forcing its Cloud strategy on us.The ProContractor technical support team is truly fantastic, and mostly goes the extra mile. This is really the only area that Viewpoint has improved upon. Even low priority requests are usually responded to same or next day. The techs have been around a while and really know their stuff. > > **Inconvénients**: When we purchased ProContractor from Maxwell Systems in 2013, it was available only as on-premise software, and very reasonably priced. We bought the software free and clear and chose the optional annual support. A few years later Viewpoint acquired the software, and our costs have soared since as the software has stagnated and actually deteriorated. Nevertheless, we are paying heavily just to run the software, albeit on-premise, i.e. the optional support is now mandatory. To add insult to injury, Viewpoint is now forcing customers to migrate to the Cloud by December 2026, but without any API support, and for this we will pay even more. Of course, this cost increase is spun as a huge advantage but for us makes this move is a non-starter. A closed Cloud based solution is a very poor choice in this day and age. Also, the last few "performance" releases have degraded the software quality significantly, whereas the upgrades used to be rock solid. I would not recommend this software until Viewpoint invests in some API capabilities. Unfortunately, Viewpoint has lost its way with this product, which is a great shame as it had so much potential in its market niche. > > When we acquired the software it was a fully functional (for our needs), well-priced and very simple to use on-premise entry level system from Maxwell Systems. Prior to this we were pretty much a paper and pencil organization. Nevertheless, the learning curve was quick, which has a lot to say about the intuitive nature of the software. Maxwell Systems implemented ProContractor on time and under budget, something which is inconceivable today. We purchased the software free and clear with optional annual support. With a bit of imagination and some in-house technical expertise, you could build fairly sophisticated integrations with Excel VBA macros reaching into the ProContractor database. The SSRS reporting was and is still in a different class compared to even the enterprise level competition.A few years later Viewpoint purchased the product. Costs have skyrocketed, and on-premise customers are now being forced into the Cloud by end of 2026, which is certainly the way the the world is going, but since Viewpoint offers no API support for ProContractor, this will break all our on-premise integrations, but also precludes us from exploring 3rd party add-on solutions. Viewpoint is not at all invested in helping us through this dilemma. ----- ### "Highly potent if you understand the value proposition" — 4.0/5 > **Dillon** | *22 septembre 2014* | Construction | Taux de recommandation : 8.0/10 > > **Avantages**: First, it should be noted that ProContractor is an entity owned and maintained by Viewpoint Construction Software. If anything, my experience has improved since VCS' acquisition of Maxwell Systems. ProContractor does a magnificent job for medium-sized contractors who require some costing rigor in addition to an integrated software package (i.e., including accounting, project management, and estimation in one piece). However, despite the seductiveness of the product's marketing, a considerable amount of thought needs to be invested in determining, analyzing, and comparing your present internal processes from estimation to project closeout with what ProContractor offers. In other words, do not let the marketing materials do the thinking on such a crucial decision for you. ProContractor was designed with industry best practices regarding workflow as well as internal controls in mind, not necessarily simplicity (as with QuickBooks). Many complaints pertinent to supposed extraneous steps actually tie back to how the software, through an impressive yet simple permissions infrastructure, can control who (for example, in accounts payable) enters invoices, approves them, selects them for payment, prints (i.e., has access to) the checks, and posts the transactions. Shortcuts are inexpensive until you realize how expensive fraud and lost trust can become. > > **Inconvénients**: I do not dislike this software or the vendor, but this is an excellent opportunity to address points made by others who are dissatisfied with the product, for their disappointment deserves attention from even the most satisfied customer. When my firm adopted ProContractor and dumped QuickBooks Enterprise three years ago (just prior to my hiring, actually), we chose something that was decidedly less impressive upon implementation than presented to the directors during a trade show in Las Vegas. No thought had been given as to how our processes would align with ProContractor's intuition of proper workflow, because we were primarily concerned about fully integrating the firm's processes and procedures within the software ecosystem. We went live in three months flat after intense scrutiny of our costing, project management, and estimation procedures, humbling ourselves along the way through reconciling what we thought we knew with ProContractor's processes architecture and internal controls logic. Granted, we had suggestions (and lots of them) that were heard. Many of them, such as the lien management feature and many of the improvements in iPad integration, can be tied directly to our recommendations. Ultimately, we were satisfied, but that was because our expectations were not to invest in a system that would cater to ourselves without acceptance of potentially radical change, but rather to develop a relationship with the software and vendor that was founded on a trust of the system's logic. From there, we could use the system as a mirror to check our understanding of our business versus how it can function even more efficiently. ----- ### "Great All in One System for those upgrading from QuickBooks" — 4.0/5 > **Owen** | *22 novembre 2017* | Verre, céramique et béton | Taux de recommandation : 8.0/10 > > **Avantages**: ProContractor is a great all in one integrated system, housing all needs of our business, from estimating and project management through HR (not enrollment) and accounting. All modules are communicating mostly seamlessly and it handles our many intercompany transactions without issue. In addition, for someone who was new to the construction industry as an accounting professional when I started using ProContractor, I found it incredibly user friendly and easy to navigate\! > > **Inconvénients**: As someone who is not extremely IT savvy, my biggest complaint is the out of the box reporting capabilities. Because of the module design, often you can't combine multiple attributes of two different modules into one report, instead you download the information and work with it in Excel. In addition, project management reporting is lacking, especially from a budget to actual perspective, despite all of the necessary information being there (this is from an accounting perspective, but I don't often hear that from our project managers). Also, the journal entry process is extremely cumbersome - I don't understand why they can't just design an Excel upload template. Finally, from a customer service perspective, I typically find them to be very responsive; however, for tougher questions or training needs, it is difficult to get them to dedicate time to you or follow-up unless you are persistent (i.e. they always want to try to knock it all out in a one hour phone call). Having said that though, some of our issues are self driven in that we skimped on a few attributes of original adoption/integration in order to save a few dollars. > > We are a specialty subcontractor with seven entities doing approximately $50M/revenue, have been growing double digits since ProContractor installation and have been ProContractor users for approximately 3.5 years. ----- Page : 1/11\ Suivant: [Page suivante](https://www.capterra.fr/software/1010522/procontractor?page=2) ## Liens - [Afficher sur Capterra](https://www.capterra.fr/software/1010522/procontractor) ## Cette page est disponible dans les langues suivantes. | Langue | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | ----- ## Données structurées