Note moyenne

  • Note globale
  • Facilité d'utilisation
  • Service client

En savoir plus sur Storyblok

Storyblok est le premier CMS (Content Management System) sans interface au monde qui fonctionne pour les développeurs et les utilisateurs professionnels.

En savoir plus sur Storyblok

Filtrer les avis (3)

Note du produit

Note du produit

Utilisation

Classer par

Avez-vous déjà utilisé Storyblok ?

Partagez vos expériences avec d'autres acheteurs de logiciels.

Filtrer les avis (3)

Saksham B.
Product Marketing Intern (Allemagne)
Immobilier, 1 001-5 000 employés
Temps d'utilisation du logiciel : 1 à 5 mois
Source de l'avis

Customization of the component

5 il y a 4 mois

Commentaires : It was great

Avantages :

You can customize every component according to your needs

Inconvénients :

I don't have acccess to Administration level

Ali K.
Ali K.
Information Technology Adviser (Azerbaïdjan)
Utilisateur LinkedIn vérifié
Services et technologies de l'information, 2-10 employés
Temps d'utilisation du logiciel : plus d'un an
Source de l'avis

Power while being simple with a flexible platform that has a rich editor and headless features

4 il y a 11 mois

Commentaires : storybook can be a great option for creating and producing content for developing companies and startups. Because it has a lot of flexibility for both developers and users. The headless feature of this CMS is very valuable for developers and teamwork, it speeds up the operation and can be used to operate a new digital platform. You can easily generate and manage any type of content for any device. Content personalization is available due to the modular content of the blocks and the features and tools of this platform.

Avantages :

Generating content for an international audience through Storyblok’s internationalization and localization tools is so easy for our team. We’ve accessed our data via a meaningful GraphQL API. Also, I like StoryBlok’s Intelligence in producing and auto converting content to responsive pages and visible on all devices with any page size and resolution.

Inconvénients :

The development team is constantly making useful changes, and everything will be better if they develop UI.

César M.
Senior Frontend Architect (Portugal)
Logiciels, 51-200 employés
Temps d'utilisation du logiciel : plus d'un an
Source de l'avis

I would love to feel more empowered as a developer.

4 il y a 4 mois

Avantages :

The documentation is easy to follow – most of our team had not issue grasping the concepts, interface and provided tooling. The tutorials continue to be helpful for us, when new developers join our team. Where the documentation is unclear, the costumer service is able to clarify.

Inconvénients :

Assets cannot be scheduled for release, like content entries are. This is inconveniencing. I often find myself feeling disappointed with the features on content delivery APIs (REST & GraphQL). Most recent example is that most of the available filters can only perform operations where "filter = X OR Y". I would, at least expect that we're able to query the api based on "filter = X AND Y" While sparring with my clients or peers I always push for solutions that do not involve "custom fields", "sidebar apps", etc. To me, it feels too much effort for too little in return because the "ecosystem" is closed. In these moments I often find myself wishing for a dedicated API just for the web interface, instead of what is provided now.