15 ans à aider les entreprises françaises
à choisir le meilleur logiciel

En savoir plus sur SonarQube

SonarQube permet aux équipes de développement de toutes envergures de résoudre les problèmes de sécurité et de qualité du code au sein de leurs flux de travail.

En savoir plus sur SonarQube

Avantages :

SonarQube provides a dashboard and reporting features that allow developers to track the progress of code quality metrics and identify areas that require attention.

Inconvénients :

If any small mistake happens then no result can be seen. We use traditional sonarqube where we install and integrate rather then plugin in jenkins.

SonarQube - Notes

Note moyenne

Facilité d'utilisation
4,3
Service client
4,1
Fonctionnalités
4,4
Rapport qualité-prix
4,4

Probabilité de recommander le produit

8,9/10

SonarQube a reçu une note globale de 4,6 étoiles sur 5 d'après 55 avis d'utilisateurs publiés sur Capterra.

Filtrer les avis (55)

Classer par

Avez-vous déjà utilisé SonarQube ?

Partagez vos expériences avec d'autres acheteurs de logiciels.

Filtrer les avis (55)

Sadri
Architecte organique (Canada)
Logiciels, 201–500 employés
Temps d'utilisation du logiciel : plus de deux ans
Source de l'avis

SonarQube l'outil a avoir

5,0 l’année dernière

Commentaires : J'ai utilisé Sonarqube que ce soit avec l'invite de commande de faire une analyse du code avant de le pousser. et aussi la création du pipeline de compilation.

Avantages :

il s'intègre dans le pipeline de compilation

Inconvénients :

L'analyse du code prend du temps et parfois, il y a des recommandations qu'on ne peut pas corriger

Franck
Franck
Software engineer (Cameroun)
Utilisateur LinkedIn vérifié
Logiciels, 11–50 employés
Temps d'utilisation du logiciel : plus d'un an
Source de l'avis

Avis positif

5,0 il y a 9 mois

Avantages :

Le fait que l'on puis enregistrer nos propre metriques pour les tests de qualités

Inconvénients :

La documentation n'est pas forcément la plus aisée

Utilisateur vérifié
Utilisateur LinkedIn vérifié
Internet, Auto-entrepreneur
Temps d'utilisation du logiciel : plus d'un an
Source de l'avis

Un super outil pour améliorer la qualité de code et la maintenir

5,0 il y a 3 mois

Commentaires : J'ai utilisé SonarQube sur des repositories contenant des applications Angular, .NET et des scripts SQL. A chaque fois les recommandations étaient pertinentes et ont pu améliorer la qualité du code.

Avantages :

SonarQube est complet. Il permet l'analyse de nombreux langages de développement sur plusieurs projets. Il propose de base plusieurs jeux de règles de qualité à appliquer et permet d'en ajouter d'autre. Pour chaque règle un exemple est fourni et des explications assez claire. Certaines règles concernent la qualité du code, mais pas que. Certaines touchent à la sécurité et d'autres aux performances. L'intégration dans un process de build via des tâches ou des jobs est assez facile.

Inconvénients :

Le plus gros inconvénient de SonarQube est son coût qui peut s'avérer, selon les projets, un peu élevé. L'outil est néanmoins très facile à utiliser et à mettre en place.

Sachin
Sachin
DevOps Engineer (Inde)
Utilisateur LinkedIn vérifié
Logiciels, 10 000+ employés
Temps d'utilisation du logiciel : 6 à 12 mois
Source de l'avis

Code Analysis and ensuing security against threats

5,0 il y a 2 ans

Commentaires : Overall experience with Sonarqube is pretty wholesome integration came handy with my CI/CD tools such as Azure Devops and Jenkins. Provides insights against vulnerabilities and common threats so that necessary actions can be taken by developers to ensure the security and good coding practices to follow. Features like PR decoration allows to get results in CI/CD tools itself if passed then only commit happens to master branch.

Avantages :

Feature like Code Analysis and publishing those analysis report to end user. You can use default Quality Gates and Quality Profiles for scanning of your code. In case you want to modify these you can do that and define your own rule. Whenever there's commit in repo you just need to configure the task in your continuous integration pipeline if it passed the parameter only then commit will happens the master/main branch otherwise it will not. With these features you can eliminate the security threats and ensure that developers are following good practices while developing their code. I have integrated it with Azure DevOps.

Inconvénients :

Only thing which I can think can be improved is logging of events. Sometime it becomes hard to debug the issues. Other then that, I think over all this fulfills all the requirements.

Utilisateur vérifié
Utilisateur LinkedIn vérifié
Services et technologies de l'information, 501–1 000 employés
Temps d'utilisation du logiciel : plus d'un an
Source de l'avis

Alternatives envisagées précédemment :

Best Code Quality check Tool

5,0 il y a 2 ans

Commentaires : We are really taking help of SonarQUbe in maintaining code quality. Doing code scanning on each JIRA story completion. It also helps our developers to improve their code quality. Coding standards are better now. Reports are very useful.

Avantages :

1. Calculate the quality of code and also helps to improve the quality by providing the solution 2. Highlight the vulnerabilities , repetitive line of code 3. Developer Friendly tool as it provides recommendations on the line of code which needs an improvement. 4. Create Scan reports on demand 5. Option to add exception in code

Inconvénients :

1. Report Generation sometime take long time. 2. User Interface should be enhanced. 3. Lack custom rule set 4. As per cost, it is little bit expensive.

Utilisateur vérifié
Utilisateur LinkedIn vérifié
Services et technologies de l'information, 201–500 employés
Temps d'utilisation du logiciel : 6 à 12 mois
Source de l'avis

Elevate your code quality to the next level

4,0 il y a 3 semaines Nouveau

Commentaires : The development process has been a bit slower than usual after SonarQube integration, but the quality and readability of the code is much better.

Avantages :

The main feature of SonarQube is that it detects code complexities within the code so that the developer can optimize it. It also detects accessibility and security issues; code smells and suggests changes.

Inconvénients :

It is a bit difficult to integrate with existing services and the quality checks may also conflict with other integrations.

Chandramouli
DevSecOps Lead (Inde)
Hôpitaux et soins de santé, 501–1 000 employés
Temps d'utilisation du logiciel : 6 à 12 mois
Source de l'avis

Great tool to drive Coding Quality standards

3,0 il y a 3 ans

Commentaires : PR analysis and Integration with Bitbucket are most in avoiding the new issues.
The tool needs a lot of improvements
1. Number of rules should be increased.
2. Few rules should have custom exclusions. Ex: Naming conventions => Organisation-specific words will be there which should be in Capital.
3. Generating a lot of false positives
4. Executive reports should generate based on scheduled triggers. We have 20 projects which are assigned to a Portfolio. if you are going to generate a report and send an email for the first portfolio calculation then the rest of the 19 projects info for that day will be missed. Higher management will think that the generated report is the latest but it is not.
5. PR analysis reports should be generated Quickly

Avantages :

PR analysis and Integration with Bitbucket are most helpful.

Inconvénients :

1. Number of rules should be increased. 2. Few rules should have custom exclusions. Ex: Naming conventions => Organisation-specific words will be there which should be in Capital. 3. Generating a lot of false positives 4. Executive reports should generate based on scheduled triggers. We have 20 projects which are assigned to a Portfolio. if you are going to generate a report and send an email for the first portfolio calculation then the rest of the 19 projects info for that day will be missed. Higher management will think that the generated report is the latest but it is not. 5. PR analysis reports should be generated Quickly

Réponse de l'équipe de SonarSource

il y a 3 ans

Thank you for your review, Chandramouli. We appreciate your feedback, and invite you to join the SonarSource Community Forum. SonarSource Community Forum: https://community.sonarsource.com/ Posting to the Forum will allow there to be transparency to the community, and allow our product managers & users to understand any issues you are facing. To better assist you, please indicate what language(s), and how long the PR analysis is actually taking; as well as, examples of the false positives. Thanks!

Utilisateur vérifié
Utilisateur LinkedIn vérifié
Banque, 10 000+ employés
Temps d'utilisation du logiciel : plus de deux ans
Source de l'avis

Code Quality Assurance

4,0 il y a 4 semaines Nouveau

Commentaires : Overall, impressed by this tool that supports multiple languages, monitoring code quality, bugs and vulnerability detection. Also, integrates well with Jenkins, GitHub, etc.

Avantages :

- It supports almost all commonly used languages like JAVA, Python, Javascript, etc. - Integrates well with CI/CD pipeline established in tools like Jenkins and GitHub. - Detects code duplication, bugs and vulnerabilities in code.

Inconvénients :

- May be complex to understand the reports for new users. - May block delivery/deployment if hard gates are enabled by DevOps team which may delay project delivery.

Utilisateur vérifié
Utilisateur LinkedIn vérifié
Enseignement supérieur, 1 001–5 000 employés
Temps d'utilisation du logiciel : 6 à 12 mois
Source de l'avis

Alternatives envisagées précédemment :

SonarQube is Great for Developers!

5,0 l’année dernière

Commentaires : We could identify many code related issues that are presented in our code and improve the quality of the application that we are developing. As a overall, SonarQube tool is able to add a value to our applications.

Avantages :

It is simple for developers to recognize their code smells, unused lines of code, errors, problems with the third-party libraries they are using, etc. information and the precise location of the issue. It also offers answers to those problems. As a result, figuring out the problems and fixing them is simple. This will be a terrific tool for developers. Except that, we can introduce our own rules for checking the code quality. It could identify the code issues that are vulnerable to cyber attacks such as XSS, SQL Injection, etc.

Inconvénients :

It was difficult to use the SonarQube on-premise application. Once we pushed a new code section, the server needed to restart in order for the application to work.

Mo
Mo
Lead DevOps Engineer (É.-U.)
Utilisateur LinkedIn vérifié
Services juridiques, 501–1 000 employés
Temps d'utilisation du logiciel : plus de deux ans
Source de l'avis

Alternatives envisagées précédemment :

Developer friendly SAST

4,0 l’année dernière

Avantages :

We really like the IDE tool called SonarLint which makes it easy for developers to integrate with most IDEs and lint their code even before committing it to the repos. Another advantage was that we were able to self host our own instance on our Kubernetes cluster and keep the versions based on the containers we specify to pull.

Inconvénients :

Other engines tend to scan the same code base faster. Not too much of a con since this is all automated.

Flor
Flor
Software Developer (Pérou)
Utilisateur LinkedIn vérifié
Logiciels, 11–50 employés
Temps d'utilisation du logiciel : plus d'un an
Source de l'avis

A free tool for source code analysis

5,0 l’année dernière

Commentaires : It helped me to be able to do my job in improving the code, giving me possible solutions and saving me time.

Avantages :

What I find most useful in this software is the code analysis, which gives detailed reports of the errors found and then suggests possible solutions. This saves time in software development.In addition, their large community helps solve problems that arise along the way.

Inconvénients :

Sometimes the reports can give false positives, which requires that the personnel in charge of handling the software carefully review the results to avoid false positives.

Susan
Software Engineer (Australie)
Compagnies aériennes/Aéronautique, 201–500 employés
Temps d'utilisation du logiciel : 6 à 12 mois
Source de l'avis

Great product!

5,0 il y a 9 mois

Avantages :

This product has actually improved productivity within my team by making sure there’s no duplicate code and by making code easily understandable.

Inconvénients :

Code maintenance is actually a difficult part.

Ie
DevOps Engineer (Estonie)
Logiciels, 1 001–5 000 employés
Temps d'utilisation du logiciel : plus d'un an
Source de l'avis

Popular tool for code smell search in the organisation's repositories

5,0 il y a 8 mois

Avantages :

Easy-to-administer tool, with good functionality to monitor security part of your code (using SAST methodology), with ability to integrate with Jenkins, GitHub and other tools. You are able to fail the build if the code doesn't meet percentage score.

Inconvénients :

When new repository is added - there should be pop-up suggestion to create SonarQube project for it, coming from SonarQube. At the moment the user/administrator must watch out for new repositories in the organisation, without a note from the system itself that there is a new repository which you might want to add for scanning.

Utilisateur vérifié
Utilisateur LinkedIn vérifié
Services et technologies de l'information, Auto-entrepreneur
Temps d'utilisation du logiciel : plus de deux ans
Source de l'avis

Alternatives envisagées précédemment :

Measure the quality of your software

5,0 l’année dernière

Avantages :

I like sonarqube dashboard and the flexibility that quality gates provide to measure your software quality. You can set up you own thresholds for maintenance, reliability, security, code coverage and many other metrics, and allow only versions passing this quality gate to be deployed.

Inconvénients :

Unfortunately it lacks an easy way to see trends and go deep into which developers are the best/the worst. Also, it is paid if you need to analyse software in some languages, available only on the cloud.

Carlos
IT Manager (Espagne)
Banque, 51–200 employés
Temps d'utilisation du logiciel : plus de deux ans
Source de l'avis

Sonarqube essential code quality analysis tool

4,0 l’année dernière

Commentaires : In short, it is an indispensable tool and should be mandatory in all software development companies.

Avantages :

The ability to analyze the quality of the code in each deployment or integration, together with the possibility of modifying the rules to allow deployment or not (quantity or criticality of errors or defects), as well as vulnerability analysis allows for better software, always keeping in mind of the developers the quality and security of the code.

Inconvénients :

Like everything, the time it takes to leave it well configured and integrated with the rest of the systems, as well as the maintenance and updating of the standards, rules and vulnerabilities depending on the programming language and the news that are published at the level of security.

Utilisateur vérifié
Utilisateur LinkedIn vérifié
Services et technologies de l'information, 1 001–5 000 employés
Temps d'utilisation du logiciel : plus de deux ans
Source de l'avis

Alternatives envisagées précédemment :

The least you can do for software quality

5,0 l’année dernière

Avantages :

Sonarqube allows anyone to run a scan for code smells, bugs or vulnerabilities. There is no reason not to use it or integrate it into your CI/CD pipelines. Even if you do not enforce passing the quality gate, it helps a lot in tracking and highlighting where are your weaknesses. Code duplication and Code coverage are very useful tools to understand the overall quality of your development.

Inconvénients :

It is hard to view historic data, and once you run a new analysis you cannot see the previous ones anymore from the same unified dashboard, you have to enter into each metric and check the history link. Please bring back the history dashboard from sonar 5!

Utilisateur vérifié
Utilisateur LinkedIn vérifié
Logiciels, 10 000+ employés
Temps d'utilisation du logiciel : plus de deux ans
Source de l'avis

Excellent code assurance tool

3,0 l’année dernière

Commentaires : It's a great tool and be understood by experienced people more easily.

Avantages :

Sonarqube helps me find out if there are any repetitive lines in my code. Since the code sometimes get lengthy or at times missed by me to recheck. It is added in continuous integration in jenkins which when runs code smells, coverage and quality will be detected.

Inconvénients :

At times we need to precisely set all the settings for the issues to be detected. If any small mistake happens then no result can be seen. We use traditional sonarqube where we install and integrate rather then plugin in jenkins. So the traditional method needs to be more careful in installing and running it.

Daniel
Solution Architect (Danemark)
Immobilier, 201–500 employés
Temps d'utilisation du logiciel : plus de deux ans
Source de l'avis

Review

4,0 il y a 3 ans

Commentaires : It have been a mixed ride overall. The actualy code analysis is really great, the rest is so so.

Avantages :

The amount of errors it catches and that developers code look somewhat similar in mindset after using it for some time.

Inconvénients :

The setup with CodeCoverage is a nightmare and it seems is not working equallty well all the time. We also have a solution where it doesn't even work.

Réponse de l'équipe de SonarSource

il y a 3 ans

Hi Daniel. Thank you for your review of SonarQube. We appreciate your feedback! Regarding your code coverage issues, have you checked out our Community Forum? There may be a solution/fix already identified and if not, you can easily start a new thread and provide us with the details around your workflow, language(s), etc. Thanks! Community Forum: https://community.sonarsource.com/

Marcin
Senior Technical Engineer/Senior DevOps Engineer (Pologne)
Services et technologies de l'information, 10 000+ employés
Temps d'utilisation du logiciel : 6 à 12 mois
Source de l'avis

Staple in the CI/CD pipelined quality gate solutions

4,0 l’année dernière

Commentaires : It allows our dev teams to keep consistent level of code quality and known issues proof in code and used target platforms so as to provide to end users/customers highest quality products delivered in CI/CD methodology.

Avantages :

Easily add source code analysis for potential bugs and pitfalls to warrant against developers' errors or just not efficient coding by novices, projects dependencies on vulnerable platforms and potential long-term support issues due to how your code is structured. Simple deployment of binaries needed for scans for major target build environments OSes, plus easy to use APIs, all for the benefit of easy integration into CI/CD pipelines.

Inconvénients :

Caps and limits on key server instance component required when obtaining config for project and preset rules, when sending analysis results or getting quality gate results may make the pipelines seem to fail without easier discerning real reasons.

Gaurav
Sr devops engineer (Inde)
Automobile, 10 000+ employés
Temps d'utilisation du logiciel : 6 à 12 mois
Source de l'avis

Sonarqube a static code analysis for quality and security of the code

4,0 il y a 2 ans

Commentaires : We have been using sonarqube in our cicd pipeline for static code analysis and its been very helpful identifying the bugs early in the stages. This tool is best in the market but still missing on some functionalities, mainly in dashboards.

Avantages :

1. Ensures that only quality, bugfree and vulnerabilities free code goes into production and improves developer’s skills. 2. Supports 24+ languages. 3. Open source version. 4. Developer workflow integration 5. Detect the bugs early in development and send alerts to developers to have a look into suspicious code snippets. 6. The results are faster and can get integrated within pipeline.

Inconvénients :

1. Integration with the third party apps could be improved. 2. Dashboards could be better and code security features can be added more. 3. Sometimes false positive results

kiruthiga
DevOps Engineer (É.-U.)
Services et technologies de l'information, 5 001–10 000 employés
Temps d'utilisation du logiciel : plus de deux ans
Source de l'avis

SonarQube Usage review

4,0 il y a 3 ans

Commentaires : Cheap and good for Code Vulnerability scans.

Avantages :

The vulnerability scans that it uses encompasses a lot of languages. It also has ability where user can define custom profiles and rules. Dashboards created are easy to use and decipher.

Inconvénients :

Technical support is very expensive and need to use their community forums to get support.

Réponse de l'équipe de SonarSource

il y a 3 ans

Thank you for your review, kiruthiga!

Utilisateur vérifié
Utilisateur LinkedIn vérifié
Services et technologies de l'information, 10 000+ employés
Temps d'utilisation du logiciel : plus de deux ans
Source de l'avis

Great tool to drive Coding Quality standards

5,0 il y a 3 ans

Commentaires : Driving code quality standards across enterprise and inducing code quality gates in the continuous integration workflow

Avantages :

Static code analysis, support for Java, .Net, JavaScript, typescript, html, CSS, etc. Helps you set custom quality gates and rules as well

Inconvénients :

Community version does not support high availability. You need to pay for this feature, would have preferred it to be free. Tools upgrade process can be improved as we have to take down the tool instance.

Réponse de l'équipe de SonarSource

il y a 3 ans

Thank you for your review!

Thenappan
Technical Specialist (É.-U.)
Services et technologies de l'information, 51–200 employés
Temps d'utilisation du logiciel : plus de deux ans
Source de l'avis

Keeps ur code intact with less grammar mistake

5,0 il y a 2 ans

Avantages :

it allows us to correct the grammatically wrong code , unused imports ,variables etc. It Helps us to optimize the code with the rules specified for that project. Allows us to remove the duplicate code as well.

Inconvénients :

Integration with visual studio code and binding with project is tad difficult . Duplicate code block appears only after the build , so we have to wait till the build is completed to view whether any duplicate is present in our code.

Vishvesh
Vishvesh
Quality Assurance Engineer (Canada)
Utilisateur LinkedIn vérifié
Logiciels, 201–500 employés
Temps d'utilisation du logiciel : 6 à 12 mois
Source de l'avis

Loved using SonarQube!!!

5,0 il y a 2 ans

Commentaires : We primarily need to perform some static analyses. Everyone sends a pool request while they're coding. We must guarantee that the code is up to date before committing it to the main branch. That's basically how we work to make sure that whatever rules we've set up, whatever gates we've set up, are followed before we commit the code to the main branch. I had a lot of fun with the powerful tool.

Avantages :

The way it evaluates all of the code generated and reports on any violations of standard coding help us optimize the written code, ensuring that the smallest number of lines are created to properly cover the functionality. It offers a lovely user interface with distinct groups of infractions ranging from small to large, and it involves fixing the code's needless complexity. It also aids in the removal of duplicate code that has been used several times and the upkeep of method standards.

Inconvénients :

Integrating Sonarqube into CI/CD Pipelines takes time, and it may take even longer if the developer is newer. More real-time solutions could be included in the available guide, making it easier to handle issues and complete the integration.

Tolgay
DevOps Engineer (Turquie)
Télécommunications, 10 000+ employés
Temps d'utilisation du logiciel : plus de deux ans
Source de l'avis

A great tool to improve Code Quality

4,0 il y a 2 ans

Commentaires : Tool really fulfills our needs on code quality improvements and security perspectives.

Avantages :

First of all, The tool has a great user interface highlighting all of the errors and bugs. It also shows how much effort is needed to fix those as well. We integrated it with our CI/CD pipelines in GitLab.

Inconvénients :

Enterprise licensing cost is a bit expensive. We faced rarely memory issues running the CI/CD pipelines.