15 ans à aider les entreprises françaises
à choisir le meilleur logiciel

Avis clients sur Amazon RDS

En savoir plus sur Amazon RDS

Amazon Relational Database Service (RDS) facilite la configuration, l'exploitation et la mise à l'échelle d'une base de données, y compris Aurora, MySQL et PostgreSQL.

En savoir plus sur Amazon RDS

Avantages :

Amazon RDS is easy to use relational database service as it is managed by Amazon.

Inconvénients :

The fact that the database will start from a stopped state after 7 days is particularly annoying. This could be remedied by using lambda to shut it down, but that's added work.

Amazon RDS - Notes

Note moyenne

Facilité d'utilisation
4,4
Service client
4,4
Fonctionnalités
4,6
Rapport qualité-prix
4,3

Probabilité de recommander le produit

8,8/10

Amazon RDS a reçu une note globale de 4,7 étoiles sur 5 d'après 211 avis d'utilisateurs publiés sur Capterra.

Avez-vous déjà utilisé Amazon RDS ?

Partagez vos expériences avec d'autres acheteurs de logiciels.

Filtrer les avis (211)

Monish
Monish
senior software engineer (É.-U.)
Utilisateur LinkedIn vérifié
Logiciels, 1 001–5 000 employés
Temps d'utilisation du logiciel : plus de deux ans
Source de l'avis

Cost Effective and Fully Cloud Managed Relational Database Service

5,0 il y a 4 ans

Commentaires : Had A Really Great Experience with RDS, I have been evaluating Aurora with Native RDS so i will be talking more about Aurora in this Review

Avantages :

RDS provides support for verity of database systems like mysql, postgreSql, Maria DB, Oracle, Microsoft Sql and a hybrid Aurora (supports both mysql & psql) Resizing, network management processes like subnet and security group are easily manageable. Using Aurora it has become easy to transfer data from DB to S3 using "INTO OUTFILE S3" query Aurora is really faster when it comes to executing heavy flock of query simultaneously when compared with its native RDS, it increases the over all through put Aurora Server less is a extremely cost effective solution when used with proper configurations, it scales up and scales down as per its usage (pay per sec) Supports Auto Backing up and scheduled snapshotting which stores the DB snapshot in S3, which helps in recovery at times of data deleted by mistake or data corruption by some failure in the application etc Aurora provides Export Snapshot to S3 feature, its a additional feature towards data movement from RDS to S3, from this we can easily migrate data from RDS to Redshift or Athena via S3

Inconvénients :

Can't change subnet of a multi AZ RDS Database directly, to achieve this i had to first change my DB to single AZ Aurora Server less dose not scale up when used with low CPU utilising application, user should have given the flexibility to change the autoscaling parameter for Aurora server less (CPU utilisation 70%) Aurora the use of "INTO OUTFILE S3" query requires some additional setup steps at the s3 bucket end and IAM role which is well documented, but quite confusing, Aurora dose not support newer mysql or psql versions which are supported by its native RDS's Aurora when compared with its native RDS its slower for executing single queries, officers Aurora is really faster when it comes to executing heavy flock of query simultaneously, but at the least we expect Aurora to perform as the same level as its native RDS when it comes to single queries Aurora's Export Snapshot to S3 feature only supports Parquet file format, and on trigging Export it takes more time to start, it wold be better if the process starts instantaneously

Ana
Ana
Security Architecture Discipline leader (Espagne)
Utilisateur LinkedIn vérifié
Banque, 10 000+ employés
Temps d'utilisation du logiciel : plus d'un an
Source de l'avis

Alternatives envisagées précédemment :

High availability even for database beginners

4,0 il y a 2 ans

Commentaires : I am using it as a MySQL server. With a managed database server, almost everything can be configured by just operating the configuration screen, so it is recommended that even members with little knowledge of MySQL can create a high availability database infrastructure, such as creating a Master-Slave configuration. It was possible to significantly reduce the man-hours required to install and configure the DB supports in EC2 and the upgrade procedure for maintenance, and dedicate the man-hours to other design and construction work. Including a BD license, it has freed us from license management. In addition, by not needing a physical space, we are freed from the whole flow of purchasing it.

Avantages :

It is a pay-per-use system where you are only charged for the number of transactions that occur. Still, there is also a subscription system called Reserved Instances (RI), so instances that generate transactions frequently use this system to reduce costs significantly. There are three types to choose from: one-year prepayment, one-year prepayment, monthly payment, and no prepayment, depending on the kind of discount. Pay-per-use is basically cheaper for cases where transactions do not occur frequently, depending on the situation, so you can optimize the charge by using different payment methods depending on the application.

Inconvénients :

I would like you to provide a concrete fault test solution. If you do not have a high level of knowledge about RDS, you cannot be relieved that you cannot perform useful failure tests assuming a failure occurs.

Aleksandr
Aleksandr
Principal software engineer (É.-U.)
Utilisateur LinkedIn vérifié
Logiciels, 11–50 employés
Temps d'utilisation du logiciel : plus de deux ans
Source de l'avis

Alternatives envisagées précédemment :

Will cost you all yourmoney.

3,0 il y a 3 ans

Commentaires : Easy to setup. Very expensive. Play great with other AWS services.
The main issue is that metrics collected manually will never meet AWS metrics which are used to bill your stack. And of course AWS point of view will be much costly. Their Enterprise Support can not understand why metrics extracted from DB itself do not meet billing metrics and will endlessly redirect you to yet another expert.

Avantages :

Requires minimum knowledge or time to set up the database. Everything you need is basically there. Documentation is fantastic. It just works and takes all the burden of infrastructure management from you. A handful of engines, version, and extensions to them are supprted. Integrated seamless to AWS infrastructure.

Inconvénients :

Price. It will literally eat 7/8 of your infrastructure budget. Metrics lies. Performance insight simply does not work. Note, this is an opinion of somebody who paid for AWS Enterprise support (sigh, that's me) Backups are not backups per se, this is filesystem rsync. So it is easy to end up with broken DB. Support is very poor.

David
David
Head of Engineering (Australie)
Utilisateur LinkedIn vérifié
Logiciels, 51–200 employés
Temps d'utilisation du logiciel : plus de deux ans
Source de l'avis

Alternatives envisagées précédemment :

High quality, bulletproof managed database service

4,0 il y a 2 ans

Commentaires : We use Amazon RDS to manage our key production/transactional databases for our customer-facing applications as well as our development environment, internal ERP, etc. We definitely gain value and efficiency from not having to deal with the management of yet another server - and its operating system, patches, uptime, etc. - it is a real boon to simply have a database-as-a-service that we spin up, connect to, and work with, letting AWS deal with all the management.

Avantages :

AWS RDS allows us to deploy databases easily and efficiently with great resilience, scalability, and security - but without having to deal with managing a server. RDS makes it easy to spin up a new database, have multi-availability zone replicas, back it up, and do many other things. It's also dead easy to upgrade software versions - simply let AWS look after it.

Inconvénients :

Being a managed database service there are restrictions; for instance, with SQL Server you don't have the sysadmin role and you can't set any trace flag you want. You can adjust a number of parameters in the RDS console but only those which AWS have explicitly added support for. There are other caveats and restrictions for other DBMS products too. Another thing I don't like is when you change your instance size it takes a long time - but at least there's no downtime. Also, tooling is restricted. A lot of great tools to dig into performance and query tracing won't work with the AWS caveats so you have to use the AWS RDS console and logs and it can be more tedious to really drill into application performance bottlenecks.

Utilisateur vérifié
Utilisateur LinkedIn vérifié
Édition, 51–200 employés
Temps d'utilisation du logiciel : plus de deux ans
Source de l'avis

Amazon RDS - the backbone of your AWS stack

5,0 il y a 2 ans

Commentaires : Waaaay back in the day, we owned and managed huge machines on which we ran our database software. It was Oracle for a while, then we moved to mySQL. But the machine and the software were our problem to handle. Most of the time (because these are not new technologies), there were no problems. But when there were problems, there were huge problems. Because like many websites/apps, data is at the core of what we do. No database, and everything goes poof. Since switching to RDS, this has become a thing of the past. We tell RDS what kind of beefy setup we want, and they do the rest. The mySQL patching. The upgrades. If we want to move to a bigger instance, that's pretty straightforward, too. Database hosting at pretty large scale, with just a few clicks. And no machines to worry about. You get decent (but not amazing) visibility into the instance at any time. But, basically, what you really get is peace of mind, not having to worry that your system's most critical layer will flake out on you. That's worth a lot. Also: AWS's Aurora is a very nice port of mySQL. We've had no issues there either.

Avantages :

Aurora is a great port of mySQL - very compatible and super fast Prices are always going one direction: down Scalable way huge with just a few clicks Automated backups, patching, upgrades You can still do a lot of customization using PL/MYSQL The instances just stay up and running - becomes one less thing to worry about You have options: both mySQL and Postgres

Inconvénients :

It's not amazingly easy to update the various variables that enable you to configure your mySQL instance. I wish it was a bit easier to get monitoring that would give you more granular insight into what's causing issues. You don't have quite as much flexibility and control over special packages you might install to do special stuff (calculating the Levenschtein distance between words, for example).

Muhammad Arsalan
Principal DevOps Engineer (Pakistan)
Utilisateur LinkedIn vérifié
Services et technologies de l'information, 201–500 employés
Temps d'utilisation du logiciel : plus de deux ans
Source de l'avis

AWS RDS Review

4,0 il y a 5 ans

Commentaires : My company need a simple and fast scalable solution for managing MySQL databases therefore we chose RDS. Prior to RDS we were managing DB clusters installed on VMs on Hyper Visors, and it was a cumbersome job. Though switching to RDS does make our life easy but RDS is not a cheap solution though.

Avantages :

Easily Scalable as per need. AWS manage you infrastructure completely. Fast Disaster recovery if planned the architecture correctly. Multi AZ deployment and Read replica supported. Supported various DB services like MySQL, Oracle, SQL Server and Postgres. Backup procedure is very easy.

Inconvénients :

Cost on higher side. Lack of control on your DB instance, though it's good but at times you need some tweaking todo.

Utilisateur vérifié
Utilisateur LinkedIn vérifié
Informatique et sécurité réseau, 11–50 employés
Temps d'utilisation du logiciel : 1 à 5 mois
Source de l'avis

Alternatives envisagées précédemment :

Dependable Database management solution

5,0 il y a 2 ans

Commentaires : Overall it has amazing control features and i have never experienced any kind of downtime with them, they also have very enhanced security features so data birch is out of the question.

Avantages :

I is easy to integrate and implement also the customer support is quite good when one is having problems with any of their features.Its also important to note that the backup and recovery are free if you turn on the automation feature

Inconvénients :

Auto backup is not automatically turned on so if one forgets to turn it on this might cause challenges in the long run, also i don't think its right even after paying for the solution upfront that one has to leave their financial information on the system

Esra
Esra
Research and Development Director (Turquie)
Utilisateur LinkedIn vérifié
Services et technologies de l'information, 51–200 employés
Temps d'utilisation du logiciel : plus de deux ans
Source de l'avis

Best managed relational database service in the market!

5,0 il y a 5 ans

Commentaires : Choosing RDS was the best strategic decision we made. We saved a lot of time to focus on our company's growth instead of dealing with operations.

Avantages :

We have been using AWS RDS with MySQL since 2015. It is the best option we encountered in the market to set up, operate and scale a relational database in the cloud. Management Console is really easy to use. You can create, restore and scale any size of database in a matter of minutes. You should however be familiar with the technical term AWS uses. Be careful when you choose between General Purpose and Provisioned IOPS types. Multi-AZ feature is a life saver if you have a database that cannot tolerate any downtime. Point in time recovery saved us a lot. Also RDS takes automatic backups regularly. You should also try Amazon Aurora which is an engine compatible with MySQL and PostgreSQL. AWS built Aurora for itself and the underlying technology is mind blowing.

Inconvénients :

You should be careful with the price of Amazon RDS and keep an eye on CloudWatch and Trusted Advisor. It gets expensive depending on usage but still it is worth not to struggle with operational problems.

Muhammad Aamer
Muhammad Aamer
Full stack software developer (Arabie saoudite)
Utilisateur LinkedIn vérifié
Immobilier, Auto-entrepreneur
Temps d'utilisation du logiciel : 1 à 5 mois
Source de l'avis

Ámazon RDS is a great option if you need a remote database

5,0 il y a 7 mois

Commentaires : My experience with Amazon RDS was great because i could easily establish remote connection to it. It was fast the data retrieval was fast, it is reliable and it is not expansive for what it is providing.

Avantages :

I like some of the things the most about amazon RDS no 1 obviously the pricing it is amazing you only get charged for your usage and then secondly the remote connection although it is not very easy but when you establish it like for example with your microsoft workbench then there is nothing better than Amazon RDS and then there is more good things for example this is very very secure and fast and reliable

Inconvénients :

The only thing i do not like about is it is very very hard if you are not a Database administrator this is probably harder for you maybe you need some extra exclusive study of it

Menka
Menka
Software engineer analyst (Inde)
Utilisateur LinkedIn vérifié
Services et technologies de l'information, 10 000+ employés
Temps d'utilisation du logiciel : 6 à 12 mois
Source de l'avis

Amazon RDS review

5,0 il y a 6 mois

Avantages :

Amazon RDS is easy to use .It helps to maintain the relational database in the cloud.Also it’s flexible and secure to use.

Inconvénients :

It has higher cost compared to other softwares.And also we can only increase the allocated storage in Amazon RDS we can’t reduce it.

MANAS
Senior Software Engineer (É.-U.)
Logiciels, 1 001–5 000 employés
Temps d'utilisation du logiciel : plus de deux ans
Source de l'avis

Database Management as a Service is well implemented, which is reliable, secure and efficient

5,0 il y a 4 ans

Commentaires : RDS is a really good service, I haven't seen any Downtime, the communication between EC2 and RDS is really fast since they are in the same AWS network

Avantages :

This really reduces the operational time taken to set up a database on a cloud machine, the cost of setting up and managing is really cheep when compared to the native approach of installing mysql or psql on a EC2 and managing it, it exposes us to a verity of options and versions which we wouldn't have been aware of , and setting them up in just clicks without even spending much time in researching on it and figuring out the way to setting it up , The security management is really good, we can set all types of security managements like, subnet, security group, VPC, IAM role etc, which will take a lot of effort if gone manually , Backup restore is really well managed , we can schedule the backup process which dumps the data into the S3, we can restore it when needed , it supports all type of CURD operations including cloning a DB setup, it supports many type of databases, it has a new one called Aurora which is AWS specific which is in 2 flavours (mysql and psql) - can use it for high cost effectiveness, additional features and speed up your bulk query executions, Upgrading DB version or any other edition are easy to make without any data losses, it gives a DNS URL for the DB, we need not manually add its IP into a Rout53, Now we can integrate RDS with AWS secret, using which the application can access the DB with a dynamic password, and this creds gets rotated every day, which really increases the security. Query Execution history and resource utilisation monitoring .

Inconvénients :

I know AWS is in a process of developing new hybrid databases like Aurora, i have noticed some trivial issues in it, its slower then RDS for executing stand alone queries , but its faster than RDS while executing Bulk Queries, there may be a way to SSH into the RDS machine or accessing its DB terminal , it would be better it i can do it on the UI, instead of remembering all the commands to connect

Utilisateur vérifié
Utilisateur LinkedIn vérifié
Services et technologies de l'information, 10 000+ employés
Temps d'utilisation du logiciel : plus de deux ans
Source de l'avis

Amazon RDS - All Your Databases at same place

5,0 il y a 2 ans

Commentaires : Great!

Avantages :

Amazon RDS provides the capability to host whichever database server customer wants, providing options like MS SQL , PostgreSQL, and have its own in house Aurora DB.With the Host and user/password simplified model like any other database it allows users who are not familiar with cloud to use it similarly.I have used Amazon RDS with all kind of databases and the way it optimizes costs and provides integration to logs is amazing.

Inconvénients :

Log and monitoring on the console could be improved and enhanced heavily

Ashish
Software Engineer (Inde)
Utilisateur LinkedIn vérifié
Logiciels, 201–500 employés
Temps d'utilisation du logiciel : plus de deux ans
Source de l'avis

Amazon RDS is cheapest database service i have used so far

5,0 il y a 6 ans

Commentaires : The benefit we got from using RDS is that we have full control of the RDS instance. Unlike heroku RDS allows me to create any number of databases i want plus it provides 20 GB of PostgresSQL instance in its free tier

Avantages :

Amazon RDS provides arelational database instance that you can use to create any number to databases. All data are stored in SSD that provides faster read and write compared to conventional magnetic disk. Data can be secured by applying a security group such that the database can get request from within AWS (EC2 servers). RDS provides variety of databases each with their free tier.

Inconvénients :

Prices to enable multi availability zones for an instance is just double to their singe availability zone. It is too costly. For beginner the set up of RDS is quite confusing. Sometimes It doesn't display the estimated price of while setting up resources of an instance.

Utilisateur vérifié
Utilisateur LinkedIn vérifié
, 11–50 employés
Temps d'utilisation du logiciel : plus de deux ans
Source de l'avis

Super simple managed database solution

5,0 il y a 6 ans

Commentaires : Quick and repeatable deployments, wide range of DB flavors, fully managed and supported by AWS.

Avantages :

AWS provides a fully managed database solution covering a number of DB technologies, so most deployments can utilize this product. MySQL, Postgres, MSSQL, Oracle, MariaDB, are all there, as well as AWS's own Aurora high performance DB. Automated backups, with 5 minute point in time recovery is provided out of the box at no additional cost, as is software patching. If you require high availability spanning multiple data centers, it's there too.

Inconvénients :

If there is a downside to AWS RDS, it would be that it does not cover every use case. In the MSSQL world, you cannot use SSRS or SSIS on RDS, so would need to look at MSSQL on EC2 instead .

Utilisateur vérifié
Utilisateur LinkedIn vérifié
Logiciels, 201–500 employés
Temps d'utilisation du logiciel : plus de deux ans
Source de l'avis

Great Database option for the cloud if you want fine-grained instance management

4,0 il y a 4 ans

Commentaires : Overall Amazon RDS has been a very good solution in our switch to the cloud. Other options have come out that may be better for most people, such as Amazon Aurora, but it's great for fine-grained control over instances.

Avantages :

Amazon RDS has worked really well for us for our cloud DB solution. It's pretty intuitive and easy to use, and you can choose exactly what instances sizes, storage sizes, etc. you want.

Inconvénients :

Amazon RDS has a strange method for determining how many IOPS you get (Input/Output Operations per Second): it's based mostly on your db storage size. So if you have a smaller database that is hit a lot, you can get throttled with the IOPS. But if you have a large database that isn't hit as often, you end up having a lot of unused IOPS.

Ricardo
Software Developer (Brésil)
Impression, 11–50 employés
Temps d'utilisation du logiciel : plus d'un an
Source de l'avis

RDS is Great

5,0 il y a 5 ans

Avantages :

Amazon RDS saves me from the hassle of having to worry about backups, scalability and monitoring. It's indispensable if you have a large application which relies on SQL.

Inconvénients :

Only two cons about the product: 1. Customer support took several days to solve a critical problem I had with my account in the beginning of 2019. My service was down for two days, but this could have been sold easily if I got a faster response from the team. 2. Default max connections soft limit on MySQL databases is too low, which makes your service go down if you have a reasonable amount of traffic. I could solve that after a few hours researching how to change this configuration and also had a friend who uses RDS and had the same issue. We both almost stopped using it before knowing how to fix that.

Sushank
DevOps Engineer (Inde)
Immobilier, 1 001–5 000 employés
Temps d'utilisation du logiciel : plus de deux ans
Source de l'avis

Amazon RDS : High uptime and faster processing in-cloud database management

4,0 il y a 4 ans

Commentaires : Amazon RDS is very reliable and easy to use it support various types of databases including widely used MySQL and others like Postgres, aurora without worrying the infrastructure.
IT is very easy to migrate from existing or new database also it has helped us to avoid downtime with Multi-AZ setup.

Avantages :

1. RDS is very fast and feasible to fetch and manage the data. 2. Version are dynamic and can be chosen/changed through simple steps. 3. Restriction can be easily managed through subnets and security groups. 4. It has high uptime overcoming downtime and can be scaled easily.

Inconvénients :

1. Some time for the beginners it is not easy to setup or manage. 2. Pricing is bit high if you are creating a small instance DB. 3. Integrations with 3rd party is quite a bit complex. 4. No fully admin controls are given to manage the DB.

Benjamin
CEO (Canada)
Logiciels, Auto-entrepreneur
Temps d'utilisation du logiciel : plus d'un an
Source de l'avis

Alternatives envisagées précédemment :

Works well

5,0 il y a 4 ans

Commentaires : It's worked well for me.

Avantages :

Backed by AWS - corporate level product for an affordable price.

Inconvénients :

No support included. Need to figure out your issues on your own or pay (extensively) for support.

Utilisateur vérifié
Utilisateur LinkedIn vérifié
Services et technologies de l'information, 10 000+ employés
Temps d'utilisation du logiciel : plus de deux ans
Source de l'avis

No need of building own infrastucture, use RDS and save time ,money. Rapid development

5,0 il y a 5 ans

Avantages :

AWS is the reason, amazon is giant today and RDS is one of the most used services on AWS. No need of maintaining own infrastructure, server, backup plans. Use RDS, they have everything ready for you, create RDS instances , as much as you required, scale if you need more resources, use RDS backup plans to backup all your data and retrieve whenever required. with 99.999% availability and highly secured features, your application development will be much better.

Inconvénients :

security features need to be taken care seriously

Utilisateur vérifié
Utilisateur LinkedIn vérifié
Logiciels, 11–50 employés
Temps d'utilisation du logiciel : plus de deux ans
Source de l'avis

Amazon RDS - The Clear Winner

5,0 il y a 6 ans

Commentaires : We use Amazon RDS for all of our database needs. We use it for our transactional (OLTP) and datawarehousing database needs.

Avantages :

Amazon RDS is Amazon's solution to hosted database services in the cloud. The console is easy to use and provides a ton of functionality with the click of a button. They have CLI and other API's that makes it easy to automate processes such as backup and recovery.

Inconvénients :

Microsoft products are supported but latest features are late to be added. Amazon likes to push their own products and slower adopt new features of SQL Server.

Jamie
Software Engineer (Afrique du Sud)
Logiciels, 51–200 employés
Temps d'utilisation du logiciel : plus de deux ans
Source de l'avis

Managing a lot of database things you don't want to do yourself

5,0 il y a 6 ans

Avantages :

Gold standard in SaaS/IaaS database services. Handles many tasks and configuration options for you. Amazon Aurora is a great, fast and reliable database service available in RDS. Integrates well with other AWS services.

Inconvénients :

Ties one in to the AWS platform, particularly if you start using some of the best features like Aurora. The AWS console is not user-friendly. Can get quite expensive, but probably still cheaper than hiring highly-skilled people to manage your databases for you.

Utilisateur vérifié
Utilisateur LinkedIn vérifié
Logiciels, 11–50 employés
Temps d'utilisation du logiciel : plus de deux ans
Source de l'avis

Fantastic Managed Databases

5,0 il y a 6 ans

Commentaires : Using RDS has been great. Before we rolled our own MySQL servers and actually was bottlenecked by them in a big release. RDS opened the pipes and helped us support a lot of connections. It’s also 10x easier to manage.

Avantages :

RDS makes deploying a MySQL or Postgres cluster a breeze. Their Aurora fork of MySQL allows for even more performance boosts. Auto scaling is made easy. Back ups are made easy. RDS makes everything easy.

Inconvénients :

Pricing can be a bit steep if you need their r3 server series.

Utilisateur vérifié
Utilisateur LinkedIn vérifié
Logiciels, 201–500 employés
Temps d'utilisation du logiciel : plus de deux ans
Source de l'avis

General review about Amazon RDS

5,0 il y a 6 ans

Commentaires : The biggest benefit using this software at my current project is the simplicity of setting up a database in the cloud without the need of manual set up.

Avantages :

It has an easy setup for creating new database connections, it's very flexible regarding creation of snapshots and recoveries, easy to scale as needed, It has the ability to create replication in simple steps.

Inconvénients :

By far it has met my needs, so I have no concerns about this software.

Rehan
Software Engineer (Sri Lanka)
Logiciels, 201–500 employés
Temps d'utilisation du logiciel : plus d'un an
Source de l'avis

Well performing database

5,0 l’année dernière

Avantages :

RDS is a highly scalable database and it can scale up or down depending on the resource and workloads it has and it works smoothly even for high data volumes and increased traffic. It automatically backs up data and we can restore our data even if we lost it. This is a highly available db because it automatically stores data in another availability zone and if a failure happens, then the primary database will be replaced with that replica.

Inconvénients :

With our application requirement, we have to choose the supported db engine. That db engine running inside RDS has some limitations other than running it in our machine. So that is the drawback I see.

Samuel
IT manager (Kenya)
Logiciels, 11–50 employés
Temps d'utilisation du logiciel : plus de deux ans
Source de l'avis

Scale it with Amazon Rds!

5,0 l’année dernière

Avantages :

InexpensiveEase to useData security is highly recommended

Inconvénients :

Affected by system crashes which May result in data loss