15 ans à aider les entreprises françaises
à choisir le meilleur logiciel

Avis clients sur Veeva QualityOne EQMS

En savoir plus sur Veeva QualityOne EQMS

Suite d'applications SaaS en ligne pour la gestion de la qualité, le contrôle des documents et la gestion de la formation.

En savoir plus sur Veeva QualityOne EQMS

Avantages :

One of the thing that i love with Veeva is, it can handle my complex document easily and the interface of the software is very easy to navigate with.

Inconvénients :

Sometimes the relationships between objects is not automatically created. For example you can relate a finding to an audit, but then you must go into the audit and relate it back to the finding.

Veeva QualityOne EQMS - Notes

Note moyenne

Facilité d'utilisation
4,3
Service client
4,6
Fonctionnalités
4,3
Rapport qualité-prix
4,3

Probabilité de recommander le produit

8,8/10

Veeva QualityOne EQMS a reçu une note globale de 4,7 étoiles sur 5 d'après 12 avis d'utilisateurs publiés sur Capterra.

Avez-vous déjà utilisé Veeva QualityOne EQMS ?

Partagez vos expériences avec d'autres acheteurs de logiciels.

Filtrer les avis (12)

Utilisateur vérifié
Utilisateur LinkedIn vérifié
Appareils médicaux, 11–50 employés
Temps d'utilisation du logiciel : plus d'un an
Source de l'avis

Veeva QualityOne

5,0 il y a 6 ans

Commentaires : We use QualityOne as an electronic quality management systems.

Avantages :

Best in class document and record management and pretty good quality event management to boot. UI is great, document handling is above par, and while quality events can sometimes feel like an add on, the UI is still great and customization / configuration is a breeze. Additional selling points for us were the full API and excellent and responsive troubleshooting / support.

Inconvénients :

Quality event management utilizes a slightly different format than document management, and it's not as robust as the document management, but the value is still excellent and configuration options allow more flexibility than other solutions we've seen in the price range.

Adam
Senior Quality Engineer (R.-U.)
Appareils médicaux, 51–200 employés
Temps d'utilisation du logiciel : plus d'un an
Source de l'avis

Alternatives envisagées précédemment :

Veeva Vault Documentation and Quality Management

5,0 il y a 4 ans

Commentaires : Implementing QualityOne has provided the company with a single solution for its document control requirements and automating various processes involved in its Quality Management System. This means that users, management and auditors are able to quickly access data with the knowledge that they are viewing the latest version in a secure manner.

Avantages :

We chose this software initially for our document management system with the intention of expanding its use to encompass all of our quality management system. The features that our end-users particularly like are the ease of use of the application, people found that it was very intuitive and with a little familiarity were able to accomplish tasks in a quick and efficient manner. People also liked the fact that they could view and compare documents without having to go to the trouble of always downloading the record to their PC simply to see it's contents.

Inconvénients :

The rendition of documents held is limited and could be expanded to cover other formats

Jerome
Core IT Manufacturing and R&D Domain Leader (France)
Cosmétiques, 5 001–10 000 employés
Temps d'utilisation du logiciel : 1 à 5 mois
Source de l'avis

L'Occitane review (IT point of view)

4,0 il y a 4 ans

Avantages :

- OOB tool - Online solution : first time ever we saw an app (draft version) the day after the Kick Off ! - Friendly and easy to use for end users - Implementation teams share their other customers experiences ans best business practices, this is a HUGE project accelerator

Inconvénients :

For today the object versionning is not a natively integrated feature. TOO EXPENSIVE !

Mike
IT Regulatory Quality Manager (É.-U.)
Produits pharmaceutiques, 1 001–5 000 employés
Temps d'utilisation du logiciel : plus de deux ans
Source de l'avis

QualityOne - One stop for EASY Quality Management

5,0 il y a 6 ans

Avantages :

The ease of use is second to none. I have a lot of users who need access to the system who themselves have never worked in a Quality Management System before, let alone in the Pharma industry before. If I had to give them access to other systems (like Master Control, Trackwise, Documentum) I'd be extremely worried about their ability to utilize the system in an efficient manner. QualityOne makes every task (like approving docs, adding a CAPA, etc) simple. To date, I have not had one user ever report the system was hard to use. Many users have already become super users just by using the system on a day by day basis.

Inconvénients :

The initial configurations sometimes do not push through correctly to the production system, and these arent checked before go-live. But these issues are easily remediated and typically, in our case, have not caused any downtime.

Thomas
Electrical Engineer (É.-U.)
Biens de consommation, 10 000+ employés
Temps d'utilisation du logiciel : plus d'un an
Source de l'avis

Simple to Use

5,0 il y a 6 ans

Commentaires : We have increased quality compliance with our documentation while eliminating over 2 peoples worth of effort across our site. We have been able to move from several document management solutions to 1 because it is meeting all of our needs.

Avantages :

Easy to navigate and understand user interface. Users at my site are consistently able to use the product with zero formal training.

Inconvénients :

Currently difficult to print documents, many steps are required.

Hasbullah
Hasbullah
Sales And Marketing Specialist (Malaisie)
Utilisateur LinkedIn vérifié
Télécommunications, 5 001–10 000 employés
Temps d'utilisation du logiciel : plus d'un an
Source de l'avis

High quality product

4,0 il y a 3 ans

Avantages :

One of the thing that i love with Veeva is, it can handle my complex document easily and the interface of the software is very easy to navigate with.

Inconvénients :

The pricing scheme is quite steep and expensive.

Danny
Quality Development Director (Irlande)
Biotechnologie, 201–500 employés
Temps d'utilisation du logiciel : plus d'un an
Source de l'avis

QualityOne as an automated QMS tool

4,0 il y a 4 ans

Commentaires : Overall we are very pleased with QualityOne as our automated QMS solution

Avantages :

Flexibility - the tool can be adapted to suit changing business requirements. Implementation team - The Veeva team which assisted us in configuring the system and going live were excellent.

Inconvénients :

One or two features are not intuitive and reassigning tasks could be made easier.

Maarten
Ehs officer (Pays-Bas)
Produits pharmaceutiques, 501–1 000 employés
Temps d'utilisation du logiciel : 6 à 12 mois
Source de l'avis

Secure management, and archiving to store your document

5,0 l’année dernière

Avantages :

User friendly for trained personnel. Reliable and hold many options to find background information yourself. To prevent easily invalid version of docs are used.

Inconvénients :

Quality systems tend to be less forgiving when mistakes are made. Having said this, it's al part of quality and reliability. Make sure to use the more restricted way of working only when it is really needed.

Utilisateur vérifié
Utilisateur LinkedIn vérifié
Matériaux de construction, 1 001–5 000 employés
Temps d'utilisation du logiciel : 6 à 12 mois
Source de l'avis

Replacing existing system

5,0 il y a 6 ans

Commentaires : We were looking for a solution that did not require a lot of IT time once the product was up and running as well as giving our suppliers access to their quality data. QualityOne will accomplish both.

Avantages :

The ability to configure the software is great and the main reason we selected QualityOne to replace our internally build software. The Veeva team has been exceptional in working to understand our processes and guiding us on how to best translate it into QualityOne. The software is definitely working for us vs. us working for the software.

Inconvénients :

Sometimes the relationships between objects is not automatically created. For example you can relate a finding to an audit, but then you must go into the audit and relate it back to the finding. It should make that relationship both ways automatically.

ENRQUE
QUALITY MANAGER (Brésil)
Cosmétiques, 5 001–10 000 employés
Temps d'utilisation du logiciel : 1 à 5 mois
Source de l'avis

Alternatives envisagées précédemment :

GREAT CHOICE

5,0 il y a 4 ans

Avantages :

BEST IN CLASS, USER FRIENDLY, STANDARD SOLUTION BUT COMPLETELY CUSTOMIZABLE

Inconvénients :

PRICE VALUE FOR MONEY FEE PER LICENCE SEARCH ENGINE NOT AS POWERFUL AS GOOGLE/AMAZON. EX, accents

Matias
Validation Manager (Argentine)
Produits pharmaceutiques, 10 000+ employés
Temps d'utilisation du logiciel : plus d'un an
Source de l'avis

Veeva, como gestion de documentacion de procesos

4,0 il y a 8 mois

Commentaires : Trabajando en la migracion, puedo decir que la experiencia vivida es de que es flexible y adaptable, pero se necesitan recursos que comprendan el funcionamiento, olisticamente. Muy buena experiencia si se tienen recursos para adaptarlo

Avantages :

es versatil, buena interfaz de usuario, dinamico y interactivo.

Inconvénients :

Lleva bastantes recursos, para amoldarlo a la necesidad.

Andy
Vice President of Quality (É.-U.)
Appareils médicaux, 501–1 000 employés
Temps d'utilisation du logiciel : plus d'un an
Source de l'avis

Web Industries QualityOne Review

5,0 il y a 4 ans

Commentaires : Simply, under my leadership I'm advocating Web Industries to use QualityOne not because of system capabilities but rather Veeva's strong partnership capabilities. Those partnership capabilities include but not limited to: listening to customers, subject matter expertise, and building meaningful relationships.

Avantages :

1.) Great commercial off the shelf (COTS) functionality 2.) Easy point-and-click configuration 3.) Visual, dynamic reporting

Inconvénients :

1.) Minimal embedment of LEAN/6sigma tools in processes 2.) Cost of Poor Quality (CoPQ) roll metric and report would be valuable