15 ans à aider les entreprises françaises
à choisir le meilleur logiciel

En savoir plus sur Cypress

Outil permettant de réaliser des tests "front end" sur tout programme exécuté sur un navigateur.

En savoir plus sur Cypress

Avantages :

The documentation is stellar and the community behind the project is growing rapidly - both factors that contribute to our success when we get stuck.

Inconvénients :

Currently limited to testing using Canary, Chrome, Chromium, and Electron.

Cypress - Notes

Note moyenne

Facilité d'utilisation
4,7
Service client
4,5
Fonctionnalités
4,5
Rapport qualité-prix
4,6

Probabilité de recommander le produit

9,3/10

Cypress a reçu une note globale de 4,7 étoiles sur 5 d'après 65 avis d'utilisateurs publiés sur Capterra.

Avez-vous déjà utilisé Cypress ?

Partagez vos expériences avec d'autres acheteurs de logiciels.

Filtrer les avis (65)

Dan
Dan
Product Architect (É.-U.)
Utilisateur LinkedIn vérifié
Temps d'utilisation du logiciel : 1 à 5 mois
Source de l'avis

This is a fantastic product for testing Javascript front ends. Quick & easy to become productive.

5,0 il y a 7 ans

Commentaires : Cypress.io has made writing Javascript tests a pure pleasure. It even allowed me to do testing (integration and end-to-end) on software that was written only with JQuery and mostly anonymous functions that, as a consequence of this structure, was not able to be unit tested (which Cypress can also handle). This software is more full-featured than competing Javascript testing suites, and it makes the use of Selenium purely optional (and not necessary for me).

Avantages :

Second-to-none documentation. Open source with a paid model for special services (but the open-source portion is complete). Comes bundled with JQuery, mocha, and a number of other extremely useful libraries. A key point to understand in starting with this software is that all selectors (such as cy.get() ) will keep trying until a timeout is reached. You can do either a positive selector or negate the selector (test for element to not be present in the DOM). This approach is extremely powerful. The selectors themselves, in this case, act sort of like assertions in that tests fail if the selector condition times out. Each subsequent cy.xxxx() command is only executed after the previous cy.xxxx() command completes - either the selection condition is met or it times out, so it's easy to prevent undesirable asynchronous behavior. Assertions are made using Chai, and tests are framed using Mocha syntax. I love that assertions are very English-like. Cypress.io comes with client software that spins up a browser and runs the tests. After the tests complete, you can review DOM snapshots of the test, which provides a way to play the state of the tests back over time. You can write not only unit tests, but full integration and end-to-end tests. I can't say enough good about Cypress.io. I thoroughly enjoy writing tests now, and need no other testing product for the front end.

Inconvénients :

I've only found one small thing - the way the cy.visit() command is set up. The command is set up like this cy.visit(baseUrl + the url). I would like to see it set up to be cy.visit(host + baseUrl + url).

Piotr
QA Automation Engineer (Irlande)
Logiciels, 51–200 employés
Temps d'utilisation du logiciel : plus de deux ans
Source de l'avis

Quick and easy testing for everyone.

5,0 il y a 2 ans

Commentaires : I am working with Cypress for over 3 years. This framework is reliable, fast, and user-friendly. Failed tests debugging is enjoyable with a detailed open mode console. The amount of functionalities is amazing and its usage usually is just as simple as entering one or two methods. Each test is recorded/screenshotted if failed. Adaptation to users' needs is vast - multiple configs if needed, different types of tests (frontend, API), a huge amount of open-source plugins ready to work within two terminal commands, and much more. Documentation, as well as customer support, help greatly with all problems and questions. In 95%, if you have a bug, somewhere there is a solution. However, Cypress has some downsides, like a lack of native parallelization support (which needs an external cloud). Some functionalities (because of the framework architecture) are not supported (iframes) or resolved in a strange way (real mouse hover). Also, the structure of the tests (cy.get...) may be confusing at the start, especially since it is completely different from Selenium syntax. To sum up this review, Cypress is an amazing piece of code, that helped me greatly through the years. It has some specific problems and a unique structure, but when understood and used correctly it is extremally powerful and can be widely implemented to handle apps testing.

Avantages :

Simplicity. Customer support. Documentation. Functionalities - Shadow DOM, DOM manipulation, debugger, videos and screenshots, automatic wait, etc. Open mode with all execution details. A number of additional plugins and ease of implementation. Frontend, Backend, and API testing support.

Inconvénients :

Poor support of parallelization, iframes. It may be not intuitive. Minor bugs specific to this framework.

Ian Wyatt
Ian Wyatt
Software Developer (Allemagne)
Utilisateur LinkedIn vérifié
Logiciels, 11–50 employés
Temps d'utilisation du logiciel : plus d'un an
Source de l'avis

A step forward for e2e, but still too many bugs for comfort

3,0 il y a 5 ans

Avantages :

The display for your e2e tests at every step is really what i always hoped for an e2e testing software

Inconvénients :

Is not reliable. Tests that are ran 3 times in a row, will work 1 or 2 of those times and it has nothing to do with anything you did. Debugging often gives the wrong or useless information.

Joshua
QA Automation engineer (É.-U.)
Logiciels, 201–500 employés
Temps d'utilisation du logiciel : plus de deux ans
Source de l'avis

One of the best UI automation testing tools

5,0 il y a 2 ans

Avantages :

One of the most powerful features with Cypress is the test runner. You can else debug any tests with ease with their time machine feature where a user can click on cypress steps to view a screenshot of the app and view the DOM. This has helped us create more confidence than other low/no code solutions. Our web team is loving this and enjoy writing tests!

Inconvénients :

It can be tricky learning how Cypress works and how to effective write tests. The rich documentation helps with the basics and provide recipes for more advanced scenarios. The community outside of the docs are very helpful with any questions.

Dale
Software Developer in Test (R.-U.)
Logiciels, 201–500 employés
Temps d'utilisation du logiciel : plus de deux ans
Source de l'avis

Cypress is a great flexible test framework

5,0 il y a 10 mois

Commentaires : having been using Cypress for 6+ years, I still enjoy working with it on a daily basis.

Avantages :

constantly evolving, always a new feature in developmenteasy to learn and implement

Inconvénients :

not able to use on mobile app development

Prakash
Prakash
Software Engineer (Népal)
Utilisateur LinkedIn vérifié
Logiciels, 51–200 employés
Temps d'utilisation du logiciel : 6 à 12 mois
Source de l'avis

Cypress is easy and single packed

4,0 il y a 4 ans

Commentaires : I am working as an automation engineer where I feel cypress is easy to install and get rolling. I like its outstanding features including time-travel, video, screenshots and so on. It has some issues as well but I prefer using Cypress to other automation tools.

Avantages :

This automation tool is very easy to install and write tests. The thing I liked most in cypress are given below: i. No need to install extra driver for browser. ii. It uses JS and very suitable for single page applications. iii. Single line of code will install the cypress in your machine. iv. I really love its features like time travel, video recording and image capturing, auto waiting and so on.

Inconvénients :

I have found some issues in cypress. They are working on to fix these issues. i. It does not support multiple browsers which is not be suitable for some tests. ii. "Detached from DOM" this is the common issue I have encountered.

Igor
Igor
QA Automation Engineer (É.-U.)
Utilisateur LinkedIn vérifié
Services financiers, 51–200 employés
Temps d'utilisation du logiciel : 6 à 12 mois
Source de l'avis

A must have testing tool for any web application

5,0 il y a 6 ans

Commentaires : A really revolutional tool for web testing.
We have integrated cypress tests with our application deployment pipeline. We couldn't do it before with our Selenium tests because of their flakiness.

Avantages :

Ease of use and amazing documentation. Was able to set it up and write first tests in minutes. Also a great tool for people who are new to javascript or may be just getting started with test automation. Gives full control of your application, allows you to intercept network traffic or mock your application code, which wasn't possible before in any UI testing tool. Makes your tests much faster and more stable. The dashboard gives quick access to all the screenshots and videos of each test run! Amazing!

Inconvénients :

Still lacks support for cross browser testing, although I know they are currently working on it. Has some minor bugs here and there, but there is always a workaround.

Ryan
Ryan
Software Developer (É.-U.)
Utilisateur LinkedIn vérifié
Services et technologies de l'information, 201–500 employés
Temps d'utilisation du logiciel : 6 à 12 mois
Source de l'avis

Cypress.io makes ui testing easy

5,0 il y a 6 ans

Commentaires : They are active in the Atlanta development community which I really appreciate. They have made a great product and they continue to listen to what users want.

Avantages :

The way the test runner shows what steps it is taking and shows the page it is exercising is really helpful. The selector tool saves a lot of time and helps anyone learn to write e2e ui tests. The syntax is expressive. It knows to wait for page loads.

Inconvénients :

My company wanted cross browser testing to be supported, but for what I use it for that is not necessary. And I believe that is in the works.

Brandon
Brandon
Product QA Developer (Canada)
Utilisateur LinkedIn vérifié
Logiciels, 11–50 employés
Temps d'utilisation du logiciel : 1 à 5 mois
Source de l'avis

Best E2E testing tool (and more) that currently exists

5,0 il y a 6 ans

Commentaires : - Better insight into how quality of features are being maintained across teams
- Ability to show hard evidence to management that bugs are being caught before they hit production by E2E tests written by Cypress

Avantages :

- The documentation for how to use Cypress is some of the most well-written I've ever read. The team provides many different examples and working pieces of code to get you up and running with Cypress in a bunch of environments. - The ease-of-use and speed in writing and running tests is miles ahead of any other tool that exists in the E2E testing tool market - The support you receive for using and contributing to this product is by far the most beneficial part of using Cypress

Inconvénients :

This is not necessarily a fault of the tool but debugging test failures in a continuous integration (Jenkins) environment is a pain (though there is a Github issue open to address this in the future).

Joshua
Joshua
Frontend Developer (Taïwan)
Utilisateur LinkedIn vérifié
Services et technologies de l'information, 51–200 employés
Temps d'utilisation du logiciel : 6 à 12 mois
Source de l'avis

End-to-End test with Cypress is super easy

5,0 il y a 6 ans

Avantages :

- The Cypress task runner is free and open-sourced. - It's really easy to write and run the tests. The setup process is pretty straightforward. You can get it up and running in just a few minutes! - The documentation is really great.

Inconvénients :

The package size is way too big. We have a CI that runs all of our tests (frontend and backend) and installing cypress takes a lot of time during our CI build.

Utilisateur vérifié
Utilisateur LinkedIn vérifié
Articles de sport
Temps d'utilisation du logiciel : 6 à 12 mois
Source de l'avis

Cypress is by far and away the easiest automation framework to implement and use.

5,0 il y a 6 ans

Avantages :

For me, the ease of use of getting up and running with automated testing using Cypress is one of the best things about it. From the initial install to running in CI/CD, Cypress makes your life so much easier when it comes to testing. The framework is incredibly user-friendly and easy to navigate, and you do not have any scaffolding to set up to use Cypress (no web drivers, no servers, etc.). I also love the debugging capabilities available within Cypress; taking snapshots of the DOM and having the ability to go back and see the state every step of the way has proven to be incredibly helpful. I performed a test in Winter 2017 of all current testing frameworks, including Cypress, TestCafe, NightwatchJS, and a few others; Cypress came out on top then and I believe that it still does now.

Inconvénients :

I have experienced weird OOM (out of memory) and random crashes when using Chrome while running long e2e tests with many steps; the Team has been amazing to work with and has helped me troubleshoot, but it still occurs with certain tests. Some Product Owners/Business Stakeholders do not like that it only runs on Chrome, but I do know that the Cypress Team is developing a Firefox implementation, so that issue should be resolved soon.

Utilisateur vérifié
Utilisateur LinkedIn vérifié
Services et technologies de l'information, 501–1 000 employés
Temps d'utilisation du logiciel : 1 à 5 mois
Source de l'avis

Cypress - A versatile framework

5,0 il y a 3 ans

Commentaires : Cypress has proved to be a fantastic tool and full of features, I really like using it because it allows me to implement E2E tests, without much difficulty. I intend to use resources such as datatable and outline scenarios, which allow more dynamic tests and with fewer lines of code.

Avantages :

One of the reasons that motivated the use of Cypress is the versatility of use because it allows automation of frontend, backend, and even network manipulation. By the way, you can interact with the machine, through scripts that Cypress interprets. Cypress also provides a low learning curve. Without many difficulties, you learn and can already implement functional tests, without needing to have 100% mastery of the Framework.

Inconvénients :

One of the things I didn't like very much, (more because I didn't master the tool), is that I found it difficult to implement manipulation at the network layer, which would allow me to carry out tests simulating an offline connection. I haven't been successful with that yet. Another thing I didn’t like very much is the difficulty in receiving feedback from a method. Everything is via Promise. This requires a little more knowledge to be able to recover that value.

Utilisateur vérifié
Utilisateur LinkedIn vérifié
Services et technologies de l'information, 201–500 employés
Temps d'utilisation du logiciel : 6 à 12 mois
Source de l'avis

Best Automation tool in the current marker

4,0 il y a 2 ans

Commentaires : Overall I'm satisfied as compared to other testing tools available in market. Even though it has some drawbacks, I would definitely suggest this tool over Selenium or Tricentis TOSCA.

Avantages :

It helps to create unit test cases and execute automatically to catch the text labels or headers deviation from the requirements or expected outcome. It runs faster and provides results within minutes. It also shows at what step the test got failed.

Inconvénients :

The software is limited to Google Chrome and doesn't work with other browsers. If running in cloud, it tends to slow down the processes and put on lot of load on the CPU usage.

Utilisateur vérifié
Utilisateur LinkedIn vérifié
Articles de sport, 501–1 000 employés
Temps d'utilisation du logiciel : plus de deux ans
Source de l'avis

A Must Have Tool

5,0 il y a 5 ans

Commentaires : We absolutely love Cypress. Life before using it seems like the stone age. We are consistently pumping out better code and a better experience for our users because of Cypress all while having to manually test less.

Avantages :

Cypress has reduced the amount of manual QA work and dev review and rework that we experience by an incredible amount. It is hard to imagine how we worked before using Cypress. Cypress is very easy to jump in to, but also offers incredibly deep tools to run basically any kind of test you would like to see.

Inconvénients :

As mentioned above, Cypress can get as complex as you want. We have spent a lot of time setting up tests, which seems like a lot of work in the moment, but the amount of time it saves us down the road more than makes up for it. Sorry, this isn't much of a con...

Lucy
Software QA Engineer (É.-U.)
Machines, 51–200 employés
Temps d'utilisation du logiciel : 1 à 5 mois
Source de l'avis

Alternatives envisagées précédemment :

No code web and mobile-web testing with great doc

5,0 il y a 3 ans

Commentaires : Overall their syntax is very easy to get the hand on it, flexible to edit and change with our website and mobile testing projects. Some tips and tricks, and testing library data online also very helpful for the Cypress users.

Avantages :

They have nice doc and API setting info that we can search the syntax that we need for the testing scripts. And they provides the dashboard with analytics that showing the success/fail test runs and more details about the testing scenarios. Able to using Cypress with React, Angular, Vue, and more frameworks for our projects.

Inconvénients :

Integrate with GitHub, Gitlab, Sauce Labs but not really showing the details about how to set it up or how they work together. And I wish we will able to share Cypress's recordings and screenshots with our stakeholders to get everyone on the same page about the bug fixes and new features.

Luciano
Luciano
Lead Developer (Argentine)
Utilisateur LinkedIn vérifié
Services et technologies de l'information, Auto-entrepreneur
Temps d'utilisation du logiciel : 1 à 5 mois
Source de l'avis

It's the first OSS e2e testing I'm happy to use

4,0 il y a 5 ans

Commentaires : I started using it with a personal project. It's a validation library that aims to provide plugins for vanillaJS, vue, react, angular and svelte (at least for now, I guess). I want to see if I can write an easy lib for multiple tools, allowing reuse a lot, while changing the underlying technology. Cypress helps me write e2e tests only once, and run it for every plugin I write. This ensures cross-framework compatibility!

Avantages :

- UI/UX: I'm _extremely_ amazed how intuitive is the test runner. I can check the app's state before and after an action! It helps me to find the best query selector for cypress to access an element. And they help with that with a good documentation about recommendations, best/bad practices, and the hierarchy that cypress uses when deciding what it's the best query selector. - Fast: Tests run fast. Really fast. At least comparing it with selenium and its forks. - Reliable: One thing Selenium frustrated me the most was how unreliable was when running tests. Sometimes they passed, sometimes not, but then again passed. Instead, Cypress has _always_ failed/passed tests consistently. - Friendly: tests are really simple to write. I don't have to write a lot of boilerplate of my own just to wait a page to render and then be able to check if I can click a button, for example. - It's just JS!

Inconvénients :

- It doesn't support other browsers than Chrome. Although there's an issue: https://github.com/cypress-io/cypress/issues/310 - It doesn't have a `tab()` function that triggers the tab key. It seems they expect to add it in v4, though. I really didn't use it to tests a big app, so I'm sure there are a lot of things they need to improve. Kudos for the team! Because e2e is not easy!

M. Serhat
Senior Software Engineer (Allemagne)
E-learning, 501–1 000 employés
Temps d'utilisation du logiciel : plus de deux ans
Source de l'avis

Modern way of testing applications

5,0 il y a 4 ans

Commentaires : My overall experience with Cypress was positive. I used the product both for open-source and commercial projects and got satisfying results.

Avantages :

Cypress is one of the best solutions when it comes to Javascript end-to-end testing. Writing test cases is extremely easy, record and playback features are quite powerful. It doesn't use Selenium (a legacy technology nowadays), so it's more powerful than its competitors. Finally, it's free and open source.

Inconvénients :

Pricing options are not as diverse as I expected. After the free model, the cheapest possible option is 100$ for a month. I would expect to see something in between the free model and the cheapest option.

Duc
CTO (Viêt Nam)
Services et technologies de l'information, 11–50 employés
Temps d'utilisation du logiciel : 6 à 12 mois
Source de l'avis

Great time to test

5,0 il y a 6 ans

Commentaires : We have been happy using Cypress as Cypress covered all of our needs (we don't need to support any browser than Chrome). It is fast, more reliable than Selenium. Troubleshooting failed test cases are great in general. Just wish they have more sophisticated feature to offer for the asking price

Avantages :

Cypress comes with an unbeatable test development experience. Out of the box, you are armed with a very helpful snapshot, time travel, debugger, hair-picking on a flaky test is not really a case using Cypress. The test execution speed and report is good, provide all needs for medium size project. Video capturing, when combined with the dashboard, is quite a killer combination, failed test cases are quite easy to be replicated.

Inconvénients :

1. It is somewhat pricey, given we have to execute test on our own servers (think of the extra cost to maintain those servers). 2. Cross-browser testing is not yet there 3. Running test in parallel on multiple servers is still somewhat limited

Gaurav
SDET senior leaad (É.-U.)
Réseaux informatiques, 5 001–10 000 employés
Temps d'utilisation du logiciel : plus d'un an
Source de l'avis

Cypress for ui testing- good tool

5,0 il y a 3 ans

Avantages :

Ease of use Not a lot of setup required before getting started independent of underlying technology

Inconvénients :

Does not support all the browsers does not support mobile browser testing

Utilisateur vérifié
Utilisateur LinkedIn vérifié
Biotechnologie, 201–500 employés
Temps d'utilisation du logiciel : 6 à 12 mois
Source de l'avis

Developer & QA Perspectives

4,0 il y a 6 ans

Commentaires : As a developer, TDD is extremely easy and fun to do with Cypress. As an sdet, teaching developers how to write their own Cypress test is extremely easy. the framework itself is not flaky at all compared to selenium, which is huge. this has solved the problem of SDETs in companies writing tests all the time and instead, are able to focus on building other QA tools. I know that with the recent funding, more and better features are in the works and our company is extremely excited.

Avantages :

As a developer, the ease of use to write tests is amazing. As an sdet, building the framework into our flow and codebase was extremely easy.

Inconvénients :

As a developer, the transitions, timing in general w/ GUI & cypress running into issues with iframes or vendor libraries. As an sdet, no cross-browser support. (totally understandable since Cypress is still a fairly young company and cross-browser was not a priority at the time)

Utilisateur vérifié
Utilisateur LinkedIn vérifié
Événementiel, 51–200 employés
Temps d'utilisation du logiciel : plus de deux ans
Source de l'avis

Cypress has a decent chance to be marked as revolution in web application testing

5,0 il y a 6 ans

Avantages :

- simplicity of use, no need for setup. just download and start using - cypress is a npm package, easy to use on CI - as a person with no technical background, i found cypress to be very adjustable to my current level of knowledge, while at the same time it enabled me to grow and learn more

Inconvénients :

- not much. it is still a young project, so mobile device testing, or cross browser testing are still in the future

Arin
Tech Lead, Quality Assurance (É.-U.)
Services et technologies de l'information, 10 000+ employés
Temps d'utilisation du logiciel : 6 à 12 mois
Source de l'avis

Great open source tool for front end testing

5,0 il y a 3 ans

Commentaires : It's Open Source. If not the best, certainly it is one of the best tool available today for front end automation.

Avantages :

Reliable tool for front end developers and QA engineers testing needs. Good for Unit testing and for functional testing as well. Installation is simple and easy. Test cases are really easy to write. Its an electron app and UI is great and fast. Debugging is simple and easier. No more guesses for your failed test cases. Screenshots are taken automatically for every failed test case. Time Travel feature is good and last but not the least, It has an amazing community.

Inconvénients :

Not supporting all the browsers. Also not supporting multiple browsers at the same time.

Aqsa
Senior Test Engineer (Pakistan)
Services et technologies de l'information, 501–1 000 employés
Temps d'utilisation du logiciel : 6 à 12 mois
Source de l'avis

Make your life easy and fast with Cypress

5,0 il y a 3 ans

Commentaires : 100/100

Avantages :

After using cypress, it's really hard for me to go back to selenium/appium 1- FAST 2- EASY TO USE 3- EASY TO WRITE CODE 4- EASY TO DEBUG 5- CAN MANIPULATE THE DOM I can write 100 pros for cypress because I'm loving it. If your task can be done with cypress then there is no need to think for any other tool for a second even. GO FOR IT.

Inconvénients :

There are few limitations that cypress is working on and it would not be a limitation anymore because cypress team is working day and night to giving us new updates/features. 1- Can't handle cross domains 2- Iframe can't be handled directly but there are few ways to do that. 3- Can't open multiple tabs.

Utilisateur vérifié
Utilisateur LinkedIn vérifié
Services et technologies de l'information, 201–500 employés
Temps d'utilisation du logiciel : plus d'un an
Source de l'avis

Robust Test Tool for for end-to-end automation testing

4,0 il y a 2 ans

Commentaires : Very good experience

Avantages :

- All-in-one solution for automation testing for modern web applications - Enables both Testing & Development Teams to work together to provide more coverage from the testing perspective - Also, helps in the parallel execution - Also, provides comprehensive reporting of Test Automation execution

Inconvénients :

There's nothing that comes to mind as a dislike about this tool as it's very user friendly and enables higher productivity & speed

Utilisateur vérifié
Utilisateur LinkedIn vérifié
Logiciels, 201–500 employés
Temps d'utilisation du logiciel : plus d'un an
Source de l'avis

Next Generation E2E Testing Tool

4,0 il y a 3 ans

Commentaires : Well to be honest I am so much thankful to the Cypress team, I automated E2E Test within a week whereas it could have taken month using cypress.

Avantages :

Debugging and test recording, yes it is too much easier than Selenium. Yes we have integrated it successfully.

Inconvénients :

I wish there was way to Automate Mobile App Test using Cypress other than that I don't think there are any other problem. Yes it is very easy to integrate as well.